✦ Bombay High Court · 30 Apr 2026

Judgment · High Court · 2026

Writ Petition No. 685 of 2019HITEN S VENEGAVKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) Sufiyan Syed - PA 1 of 1

Judgment

Mr. Aditya Shete i/b. Keystone Partners, for Petitioners. CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 30th APRIL, 2026 P.C.:

1.

The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner states that upon instructions the original proceedings from which the impugned order has arisen and challenged in the present petition does not survive as on today as the original proceedings itself has been finally decided as the parties have amicably settled the dispute between themselves. In light of this, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks withdrawal of the Petition. Permission granted.

Operative part

2.

The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) Sufiyan Syed - PA 1 of 1

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 30 Apr 2026. The bench was HITEN S VENEGAVKAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 685 of 2019). ← Search more judgments