Anil Brijlal Aggarwal v. Rita Anil Aggarwal
Case at a glance
- Bench
- D Y CHANDRACHUD
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Amit Shinde i/b Milan Bhise & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Vijay Hegde for the Respondent. .... ... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. 29th August, 2005. P.C.: The impugned judgment and order of the Family Court operates as a decree in a petition for maintenance under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. On the request of counsel appearing for the Petitioner, this Petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty reserved to the Petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1168 of 2005).
← Search more judgments