IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION 319 OF 2000 v. Rajesh Gurlingappa Birajdar & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3366 OF 2001 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3366 OF 2001 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3366 OF 2001 IN IN IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION 319 OF 2000 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION 319 OF 2000 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION 319 OF 2000 Sou. Anita Rajesh Birajdar ...Petitioner V/s. Rajesh Gurlingappa Birajdar & Ors. ...Respondents ..... Mr. K.S. Patil with Prashant Badole for petitioner Mr. Vijay Killedar h/f Mr. Nitin Jamdar for respondent Nos. 1 to 7. Mr. I.S. Thakur, A.P.P. for the State. ..... CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : 19TH AUGUST, 2004 DATE : 19TH AUGUST, 2004 DATE : 19TH AUGUST, 2004 P.C.P.C. P.C..
#1. Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner, learned advocate for the respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
#2. Sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay in filing criminal revision application No.319 of 2000, hence, delay is condoned. Criminal revision application No.319 of 2000 be placed for admission on 6.9.2004.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 19 Aug 2004. The bench was V K TAHILRAMANI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.