Sachin Chandrakant Salunkhe & Ors. v. Adarsh Deepak Malik
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 14
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty as sought.
Judgment
Mr. Swapnil Wagh a/w. Mr. Prathmesh Bhosale, for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Ghag, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026 PC:-
Mr. Swapnil Wagh, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions of the Petitioners, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition as there is an alternate remedy available to the Petitioners to challenge the impugned order.
Operative part
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty as sought.
It is clarified as this Petition is filed on 24th December 2024 and is being disposed of today, the Petitioners will get benefit of Sonali 915-WP-295-2025.DOC Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 from 24th December 2024 till 19th August 2026.
It is expressly clarified that all contentions are kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL 11:01:01 +0530 Sonali
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 14.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 19 Aug 2026. The bench was MADHAV JAMDAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.