✦ Bombay High Court · 08 Dec 2022

Dusane v. Mansing Shankar Jadhav & Ors.

Interim Application No. 195 of 2022MADHAV JAMDAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

the Interim Applications stand dismissed without further

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. However, it is clarified that if the decretal amount as directed is not deposited in the said period of three months, the Interim Applications stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE 3

Judgment

thru LRs Mr. Ganesh Gulab Kale & Ors. Mr. Vijay Patil a/w Mr. V.S. Kapse i/by Mr. Yogesh V. Patil for Applicants. Mr. Anant B. Bobe for Respondent no.1. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 8th DECEMBER, 2022 P.C.:

1.

By separate order dated 8th December 2022, the Second Appeals are admitted on the substantial questions of law framed therein. These Interim Applications are taken out for stay of the impugned judgments and decrees. However, as the decree passed by the learned Courts is money decree, the Applicant/s to deposit the entire decretal amount in this Court within a period of three months from today. Mr. Vijay Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant states that the entire decretal amount will be deposited in this Court within a period of three months by deducting the amount already deposited.

2.

As the Applicants are ready to deposit entire decretal amount in this Court, the Interim Applications are disposed of in terms of prayer clause (a). 2 2 IAs 195 in sa 17, 196 in sa 18, 197 in sa 19.doc

Operative part

3.

However, it is clarified that if the decretal amount as directed is not deposited in the said period of three months, the Interim Applications stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE 3

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: the Interim Applications stand dismissed without further

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 08 Dec 2022. The bench was MADHAV JAMDAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Interim Application No. 195 of 2022). ← Search more judgments