✦ Bombay High Court

ANKUSH SITARAM MEDANKAR & Anr. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. None present for the applicant. Hence, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed for default. The bail granted earlier stands cancelled. (JUDGE)

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 129 OF 2001 ANKUSH SITARAM MEDANKAR & ANR. V/S. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Coram, appearances, Court’s orders : or directions and Registrar’s orders orders : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Court’s or Judge’s : None for the applicant. Mr. Rajesh More, APP for State-respondent. CORAM : SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDO TA, J. DATED : 25 th JUNE, 2010. P.C :-

#1. None present for the applicant. Hence, the Criminal Revision Application is dismissed for default. The bail granted earlier stands cancelled. (JUDGE)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Revision Application No. 129 of 2001). ← Search more judgments