Vishal Murlidhar Patil v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Application stands disposed of as withdrawn
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Leave to withdraw is granted, with aforesaid liberty. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits. The trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the case and endeavour to dispose of the…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 18 OF 2026 Vishal Murlidhar Patil Vs. …. Applicant The State of Maharashtra and anr. …. Respondents Mr. Onkar Gurav i/b. Mr. Anjali Patil for the Applicant. Ms. Anagha Deshmukh, APP for Respondent No.1 – State. Ms. Sumaiya Khan, appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. Ms. Anupama Patil, PSI, Dadar Police Station, present. CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 18th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. :-
Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board. Mr. Gurav, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Bail Application and requested to direct the trial Court to expedite the hearing and dispose of the case within one year. Further, he seeks liberty to file a fresh bail Application, if the trial is not concluded within the said period.
Operative part
Leave to withdraw is granted, with aforesaid liberty. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits. The trial Court is requested to expedite the hearing of the case and endeavour to dispose of the same within one year. PREETI HEERO JAYANI Digitally signed by PREETI HEERO JAYANI 19:53:09 +0530
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application stands disposed of as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Aug 2026. The bench was SHYAM C CHANDAK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.