Dnyaneshwar Narayan Doke & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Mr. Ashok Kumar Dubey a/w Mr. Anil Kumar Pandey i/b SAVJ Law Solutions for Petitioners. Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 17th June 2026 P.C. : . In view of recent Judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sujal Vishwas Attavar and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors., reported in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 798, present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for lodgment of crime, on the basis of complaint dated 11th February 2019, filed by the Petitioners is not maintainable and is accordingly disposed off. ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )
( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 17 Jun 2026. The bench was KAMAL KHATA, A S GADKARI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.