THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. PANDURANG MURLIDHAR TITKARE
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.8 OF 2012 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...APPLICANT V/s. PANDURANG MURLIDHAR TITKARE )...RESPONDENT Mr.H.J.Dedhia APP for the Applicant CORAM: A.V.NIRGUDE, J. DATE : 22nd FEBRUARY, 2012. P.C. : The State of Maharashtra has not moved similar application under Sub Section (2) of Section 339 of Cr.P.C. before the Learned Sessions Judge, Pune, seeking cancellation of the bail of the respondent. They have filed the present application directly in this court. I am therefore allowing them to withdraw this application giving them liberty to make a similar application to the Learned Sessions Judge, Pune.
(A.V.NIRGUDE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 339.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 22 Feb 2012. The bench was A V NIRGUDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.