SHRI. VIJAYKUMAR @ NAGENDRA BHUPAL v. SHRI. SURESH VASANT KUMBHAR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
6) Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms
Judgment
SHRI. VIJAYKUMAR @ NAGENDRA BHUPAL MAGDUM SINCE DECEASED THR. LRS ….PETITIONER V/s. SHRI. SURESH VASANT KUMBHAR AND ORS …..RESPONDENTS Mr. Akshay A. Kulkarni for the Petitioner Mr. Vijay Killedar for Respondents CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 2022. P.C.: 1) Heard respective counsel. Order impugned is passed below Exh. 48 in R.C.S. No. 92/2009 thereby staying further proceedings in the Suit. 2) As far as R.C.S. No. 32/2009 is concerned, same is for possession whereas R.C.S. No. 92/2009 is for specific performance. 3) The fact remains that in both these suits, the subject matter is same i.e. immovable property and the parties are also same as
901.7576.19 wp.doc Defendants in R.C.S. No. 92/2009 are Plaintiffs in R.C.S. No. 32/2009. 4) In the aforesaid background, having regard to the fact that there might be overlapping evidence on the same issues, judicial discipline warrants that both these suits be tried together. 5) As such, both above referred suits be clubbed and be decided together. 6) Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: 6) Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 18 Feb 2022. The bench was NITIN W SAMBRE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.