Interim Application No. 13 of 2023 · High Court · 2023
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 389
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 201
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13 OF 2023 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1271 OF 2022 Nitin Ramchandra Kashid …. Applicant V/s State of Maharashtra ---- Adv. Kedar Patil with Adv. Jitesh Mandhwa with Adv. Gargi Joshi with Adv. Sakish Kadam for the Applicant. Smt. G.P. Mulekar, APP for the Respondent/State. ---- …. Respondent CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATED : JANUARY 13, 2023 P.C.: 1] This Application under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C is for suspension of sentence and grant of bail by Accused No.3 who has suffered conviction under Section 201 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and six months with fine of Rs 5000/-. 2] Counsel for the Applicant informs that fine amount is already paid. Considering maximum sentence awarded against the Applicant/Accused No.3 and in view of statement made by Counsel for the Applicant that Applicant has already undergone sentence for one year and one month, prayer under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. stands allowed. bdp-sps 38 IA-13-23 spktomin.doc 3] Sentence awarded against the Applicant/Accused No.3 – Nitin Ramchandra Kashid is suspended and he is directed to be released on bail on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs 25,000/- with one or two local sureties in the like amount. 4] Application is accordingly disposed of. (R. N. LADDHA, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) bdp-sps
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 389; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 201.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Jan 2023. The bench was R N LADDHA, NITIN W SAMBRE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.