✦ Bombay High Court

SONALI v. Radha Madhav Kamath

Apeal No. 5 of 2015SHIVKUMAR DIGE

Case at a glance

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Appeal is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn. 1 (2005) SC 2099. 141-APEAL-5-2015 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje

Judgment

M/s. Trimurti Builders And Developers & Ors …..Respondents ________________________________________________________________ Ms. Shweta Sangtani, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Vijay Kumar Aggarwal a/w. Ms. Mamta Agarwal, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM DATE : : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. 2nd FEBRUARY, 2026. P.C. :

2.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file appeal before the learned Sessions Court as per the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran & Etc.1

3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the appellant, appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

4.

Appeal is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn. 1 (2005) SC 2099. 141-APEAL-5-2015 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje

5.

Learned Sessions Court shall consider the delay, if appeal is filed, as application was pending before this Court.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Apeal No. 5 of 2015). ← Search more judgments