Tushar Panditrao Bhartiya v. The Returning / Election Officer
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed off
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, with liberty. All contentions of all the stakeholders are kept open. (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (VACATION COURT) Trupti 2 of 2
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15 OF 2026 Tushar Panditrao Bhartiya versus The Returning / Election Officer (The Sub Divisional Officer, Tiosa/ Bhatukli) and Others … Petitioner … Respondents Mr.S.M.Vaishnav (through video conferencing) for the Petitioner. Mr.Shajal Sarda (through video conferencing) for Respondent No.1. Mr.Ashok T. Gade with Ms.Riya John i/b. Mr.Devendra Pawar for Respondent No.2. Mr.Rahul Dharmadhikari Respondent No.3. (through video conferencing) for ---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. (VACATION COURT) DATE : 2nd JANUARY, 2026 P.C. :-
This matter was heard for some time. A Pass over was granted on request. When the matter was called out at the end of the board, as a pass-over matter, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner Trupti 1 of 2 6-wp-15-2026.odt submits, on instructions from the Petitioner, that the Petitioner desires to withdraw the Petition. If advised, the Petitioner may avail of the statutory remedy of filing an Election Petition.
Operative part
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, with liberty. All contentions of all the stakeholders are kept open. (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (VACATION COURT) Trupti 2 of 2
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed off
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 02 Jan 2026. The bench was RAVINDRA V GHUGE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.