Savitri Hiralal Wani v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, the appearance of Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde be shown for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in the order dated 2nd January, 2026.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6 OF 2026 Savitri Hiralal Wani ….Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….Respondents ---- Mr. D.P. Palodkar (through video conferencing) i/b. Mr. Shubham S. Khoche for the Petitioner. Mr. S.B. Shetye for the State Election Commission. Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl. GP for the Respondent – State. Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. Mr. K. Suryakrishnamurty, Deputy Secretary, State Election Commission present. ---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. (VACATION COURT) DATE : 3rd JANUARY, 2026 P.C. :-
This is a motion for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 2nd January 2026, filed by Mr. Urgunde.
Mr. Urgunde, the learned Advocate, submits that he was representing Respondent Nos.4 and 5 through video conferencing from Aurangabad. Inadvertently, his name has not been reflected in the appearance column of the said order. Gauri Gaekwad 1 of 2 WP-6-2026.odt
In view of the above, the appearance of Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde be shown for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in the order dated 2nd January, 2026.
The corrected order be uploaded accordingly. (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (VACATION COURT) Gauri Gaekwad 2 of 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.