✦ High Court of India · 27 Oct 2025

1. It/ekala Laxmi @ Rajeshwari Wo. Late Chinna Ramulu v. 1. M.Narasimha S/o. not knoM

Case Details High Court of India · 27 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
27 Oct 2025
Length
1,301 words

3. tvl/s. Holy Trinity Junior College, Rep by Sri Manohar Reddy, Owner of the Van beaiing No.AP-15- W8500, H.No.3-1-33, Tukka Rao Complex, Ambedkar Road, Karimnagar Town and District

4. The New lndia Assurance Company Ltd, Represented by its Branch lt/lanager, Station Road, Karimnagartown and District ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellants: Sri Venkateshwar Varanasi Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: Sri Kota Subba Rao Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: Sri A. Manohar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: Sri V. Venkatarami Red(l , The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C,V.BHASKAR REDDY MACMA No.896 of 2OL9 MENT: pursuant to the request made b-y thc learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the mattcr was relcrrcd to Lok Adalat. On I3.09.2025, thc mattcr was settled before the Lok Adalat and an arvard rvas passed by the Lok Aclalat. In vicw of the above, the MACMA is disposed of in lerms of the award dated-13.09.2025 passed by the Lok Adalat. Pending miscellaneous applications, rf any, shall stand closcd. There shall be no order as to costs' Sd/. M. JAWAHAR REODY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER i To, lTheMotorVehicleAccidentsClaimsTribunal-cum-|AdditionalDistrictJudge ' Xirimnagar'(withrecords) 2. OaeCC to Sri Venkateshwar Varanasi Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri A Manohar Reddy' Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Kota Subba Rao Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri V Venkatarami Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD CoPies 7. Lok-Adalat Award enclosed ' 4y KH .- HIGH COURT CVBR, J DATED: 2711012025 JUDGMENT ATE (E,' B z[tt _) , +' MACMA.No.896 of 2019 T C f S DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF AWARD OF LOK.ADALAT WITH COSTS 4 't)€ 1/ - i t BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMTAITTEE i'' JJ; FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legat Services Authorities Act, '1987 (Centrat Act)] Date:13-09-2025 Present:1. Hon'bte Justice G.Sri Devi, SE8 c HIGH COURT LCK ADALAT -4 (Former Judge of High Court for the State of Tclangana) Chairman

2. Smt. Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member C.M.A.No.896 of 201 9 J ol1 (Before the Hon'bte High Court) AGAINST ORIGINAL PET ITION No.448 of 2006 (On the fite of the Motor VehicLe Accidents Ctaims Tribunat cum-l Addt- District Judge: Karimnagar) Between:- 1. Mekata Laxmi @ Rajeshwari, W/o. Late Chinna Ramutu, Aged about 42 Yrs, Occ: House hotd' 2. Mekata Satish, S/o. Late Chinna Ramutu, Aged about 2l Yrs, Occ: Sttrdent. l. Mekata Swapna, D,/c. Late Chinna P'amutu, Aged about 16 Yrs, Occ: Student. 4. Mekata Ramesh, S/o. Late Chinna Ramutu, Aged about 14 Yrs, Occ: Student. (ihe appettants Nos.2 and 3 are minors they are presented by t Laxmi @ Rajeshwari, Appe[tant No'1 herein) (Att are R/o. Cheekurai Vittage of Peddapatty manda[ of Karim Presentty residing at H.No.3-1-529, lndiranagar Karimnagar) I heir natural mother Mekata nagar District ... Appeltants AND 1 7 l 4 M.Narsimha, S/o. Not Known, Aged about 45 yrs, Occ: Owner of torry bearing No.AP-9-X-2589, Rlo.2-76, Jeedimetta, Ranga Reddy District' (R1 Restored vide C.O. dated 22-6-7016 in ATACMA MP'No'3'134/'16) lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Limited, lClCl Bank Towers, Bandra-Kurta Comptex, Mumbai-400 05'l ' M/s. Hoty Trinity Junior Cottege, Rep by Sri Manohar Reddy, Owner of the Van bearing No.AP-15-W8500, R/o.H.No.3--l -33, Tukka Rao Complex, Ambedkar Road, Karimnagar Town and District' The New lndia Assurance company Ltd , nlp."t"nt"a by its Branch Manager, Peddapatty Branch' Station Road, Karimnagar Town and Distnct' . .. Respondents CounseI for Appettants/Claimants Representative of R2- lnsurance Company Counsel for R2- lnsurance ComPanY Sri P.Ram Mohan Yadav, Advocate, 5ri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager Legal Ctaims Sri Kota Subba Rao, Advocate, hearing passed: ThisappeathavingbeenreferredforsetttementbeforethisLokAdalatandafter the Learned Counsel for the parties and also the parties' the fottowing award is N EEE. E___.{Sr.#.&€rx'l:+drt#ffi t I Compensation Awarded by the Tr ibunat Compensation rAwarded i lSetttement Reached; , in the Lok Adatat. ,// J HIGH COURT LOK AOALAT t S& lc ol1 AWARD Rs.1,95,000/-(Rupees One lakh nine:, five thousand clly) '.'1th proportionate costs and interest @ 7.5i'' rcr annum from lhe da[e of petition titl the date of realization. /Ctaimants aggrieved by the This is an apDeat fited by the Petition€r order passed in MVOP No.448 of 2006 t) the Motor Vehjcle ac, icients Ctaims Tribunal -cum-l Addt- District Jud I , Karimnagar Sri Mohammed Abdul Shabbeer, Senior r \anaqer Legal Clairns foi the Respondent No.2-lnsui'ance Company has a rpeared before the Lok Adatat and represented that ihe AppeUant/Petjli appeared before the District Lega[ Service reported by the Respondent No.2-lnsur,I pendency of this Appeat, boii the parties compromise and setited the matter. Appettants/Petitioners have agreed t Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight lakhs only) to, of their ctaim in addition to the amorr lnsurance Company has agreed to pay tr setttement of the ctaim. Accordingty, cr ner/Ctaimant Nos.1 to .1 have Authority, Karimnagar. lt is ce Company that during the have mutuatty entered into a .s per the setttement, the r receive an amount of ,ards fut( and finaI settLernent : atready deposited and the same towards futl and final rpromise is recorded and the Award is passed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above said setttement, the I lsuraoce Company has agreed to deposit the above said amount within, period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Awarc that was deposited, if any. ln the everlt such deposit, the Claimants/Appetlants ;r awarded by the Tribunat. after deducting the amount rf defautt or detay in making ,entitled to claim interest as Apportionment of Compensation, if any The apportionment anrong the Appettant, I 3titioner/ Ctaimant Nos.l to 4 shalI be made as per the apportionment ( etermined by the Tribuna[ in M.V. O. P. No.448 of 2006. Addittortqt Direction(s): '1. The Appettan ts/ Petitioners are entitted to the refund of Col 2. The amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Company, i' to.

3. Soon after deposit by the lnsurance Company, the major P(r' Z are permitted to withdraw their entire share amounts at1, Petitioner/Ctaimant Nos.3 & 4 shat[ be kept in fixed depos t tit[ they attain majority, as per the orders and apportionm€r In token of consent for the above setttement and award, th: have signed this award in our presence. t Fee paid in this case. rny, shatt be given credit tioner/CLaimant Nos. '1 & the shares of the minor in any Nationalized Bank : made by the Tribunat. parties and their counsel ln terms of the compromise arrived at bet,./een the pt ties, disposed of. this case stands N I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments