✦ High Court of India · 27 Oct 2025

1. Bangu @ Bangula Suramma v. '1 . M.Narasimha S/o.not know. Aged about 45 yrs

Case Details High Court of India · 27 Oct 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
27 Oct 2025
Length
1,324 words

3. M/s. Holy Trinity Junior College,, Rep by Sri Manohar Reddy, Owner of the Van bearing No.AP-15- W8500, R/o. H.No.3-1-33, Tukka Rao Complex, Ambedkar Road, Karimnagar Town and District.

4. The New lndia Assurance Company Ltd.,, Represented by its Branci Manager, Station Road, Karimnagar town and District. ...Respondents/Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Venkateshwar Varanasi Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : MANOHAR REODY.A Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Kota Subba Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.4: V.Venkata Rami Redd y The Court made the following : JUDGMENT : l I I I I I i I I I I I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY MACMA No.886 of 2OL9 JUIX}MENT: Pursuant to the request made by the Iearned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat. On 13.09.2O25, the matter was settled before the l,ok Adalat and an award was passed by the Lok Adalat. In view of the above, the MACMA is disposed of in terms of the award dated 13.09.2O25 passed by the Lok Adatat. Pending misce.[aneous applications, if any, shatl stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/- II'.JAWAHAR REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum- I Additional District Judge, Karimnagar.

2. One CC to Sri Venkateshwar Varanasi, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Manohar Reddy A, Advocate IOPUCI 4. One CC to Sri V.Venkata Rami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri Kota Subba Rao, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:2711012025 JUDGMENT I ti :S?api T ( r') U ,B 2025 ( * t MACMA.No.886 of 2019 F tttv::, DISPOSED OFF INTERMS OF AWARD I,ASSED BY LOK ADALAT I I I I I I i I i I I I I BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMfiTITTEE rbR rur srATE oF TELAI-rGANA, HvDERA,BAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)l IEs HIGH COURT LOK,cDAtAT tiiri, iDn t t d1 Date:1 3-09-2025 Present:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, ' (Former Judge of High Court for the ftate of Telan Chairman ra)

2. Smt.Nandita Guha, Advocate, Member M.A.C.lvt.A. No.8 86 of ?O19 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST ORIGINAL PETITION No.442 of 2ff)6 , (On the fite of the llotor Vehicle Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum-l Addt. District Judge: Karimnagar) Between: - 1. Bangu @ Bangula Suramma, D/o. Late Pochatu, aged about 36 yrs, Occ: House hotd, 2. Bangu Bangula Padma, D/o. Late Pocha[u, Aged about 24 yrs, Occ: Student. (Both are R/o. Cheekurai Viltage of Peddapatty mandal of Karimnagar District Presently residing at H.No.3-7-528, Vavilatapatty Karimnagar) . Appeltantr AND

1. M.Narsimha, S/o. Not Known, Aged about 45 yrs, Occ: Owner of Lorry bearing No.AP-9-X-2589, Rl o.2-76, Jeedimetta, Rangareddy District. Rl dismissed for default vlde C.O. dated 12-3-201 5

2. lclcl Lombard General lnsurance Company Ltd., lClCl Bank Towers, Bandra-Kurta Complex, Mumbai-400051 , 3. M/s. Holy Trinity Junior Cottege, Rep by Sri Manohar Reddy, Owner of the Van bearing No.AP-15-W8500, R/o. H.No. 3-1 -33,.Tukka Rao Complex, Ambedkar Road, Karimnagar Town and District.

4. The New lndia Assuiance company Ltd., Represented by its Branch Manager, Station Road, Trarimnagar Town and District. ...Respon ondents Counset for Appeltants/Claimants Sri P. Rammohan Yadav, Advocate Representative of lnsurarre Company Cotmsel for lmurance Company Sri Mohammed Abdul Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Legal Ctaims Sri Kota Subba Rao, Advocate, This appeal having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatht and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and also the parties, the fot towing award is passed: Compensation Awarded by the Tribunat AWARD Rs.1,80,0fi)/ -(Rupees One takh eighty thousand onty) with proportionate costs and interest @ 7 .5% per annum from the date of petition titt the date of reatization. N J --<( .mrlEElal;.!,!.ldxEQ\ \ CrrmPensation Awarded (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Adatat. This is an appeal fited by the Petiti oner:, C laimants aggrieved bv tiit I -. order passed in OP No.zl42 of 2006 by t re Motor Vehicte Accident-.' Ctaims Tribunat-cum-l Addt. District Ju([ e, Karimnagar. Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior 14 nager-Legat Claims for rhe Respondent No.2-lnsurance Company ha appeared before the t-ok Adatat and represented that the ApD ]ttan t/ petitioner / C laimant Nos.1 & 2 have appeared before tl^ I District Legat Services Authority, Karimnagar. lt is reportec )y the Respondent No.2 - lnsurance Company that during the perr e'ncy of this Appeat, they have mutuatty entered into compromi,n and settted the matter. As per the setttement, the Appetlantsr I etitioners have agreed to receive an amount of Rs.10,O0,OOO/- (Rupees Ten takhs onty) towards futt and final setttement of th,: . claim in addition to the amount atready deposited and the lnsur. I ce Company has agreed to pay the same towards full and final ctttement of the ctaim. Accordingly, compromise is recorded anc he Award is passed before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above said setttement, ll l lnsurance Company has agreed to deposit the above said amour I within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of r€<eipt of (( fy of this Award, after deducting the amount that was deposit3 i. if any. ln the event of defautt or detay in making such depos'it, the C laimants /Appettan ts are entitled to ctaim interest as awardec )v the Tribunat. SEF HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT t:o 7 a = t otle\ Apportionment of Compensation, if arry The apportionment between the Appe [ant/ Petitroner / Claimant Nos.l & 2 shatt be made as per the appc lionment determined by the Tribunal in lrt.V.O.P.No.zl42 of 7006. Additional Direction(s):

1. The Appettants / Petitione6/Claimants are entitled to the r,fund of Court Fee paid in this case.

2. The amount atready deposited by the |riiilrance Comparr, if any, shalt be given cred'it to.

3. Soon after deposit by the lnsurance Company, the Appettant' etitioner/Ctaimant Nos. 1 & 2 are permitted to withdraw their entire share amounts. ln token of consent for the above settlement and award, ths p,arties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the p I ties, this case stands disposed of. 6il*^ I P.1 ,iJ c { 6 ..\.,] , CASE NO: h) .jl i 0 IDENTIFI CA TION REPORT ' l>'\1 a_ -{ 7-:" Mf,.en4 F nrv, 886 r'ro - k L4 \-n I\AMu b Respondent (s) Appeltant (s) @- A ({-5-d g' $r^'r'-o^--^'-a INSUR E RAL GET' coSr cooE : Ei. CODE t 2' ll7 t* 0-.\r & 9. k.L_^-a /lt- * -'' ' B rl-,*ovl^ "."' Counsel for the Respondent (s) .ri#iilL*.ro*, . 'DLSAi;'RY '. ''lliil;;:'S* \lt\,{ \ ,ar'L e MEMBER Counsel for the Appellant (s) u/1. \ CHAIRAAAN SER o(J :E t HIGH LOK AgAIAT Stctc o11

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments