The High Court · 2025
1 9.ig praying that in the circu rrstances stated ,n the grounds fited n suooort of the MACfiA,ihl Uig.h,C"r111aV tre pt""."O-il1iry all further proceecrings passeo in op.n-o. ,,iil"i'i%bs dt. 2,togt:zo12on the fire of 3i,"r"311il,:1 s::li;;;3,:l"the XXI Aaaitionli iiier .ruase--c,,-s.i;,;'1;;, Counset for the Appeltant: SRt. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA Counsel tor the Respondent Nos. 1 & 4: SRI CHETLURU SREHNIVAS The Court deliVerecl the following Judgment: j.*: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M'G'PRIYADARSINI M.A.c.M.A. No.1 olt7 of 20L9 T:
1. Pursuant to the request made by the Counsel appearlng for 6oth the parties, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat' Ort 14.12.2024, trre matter was settled before the Lok Adalat and an Award was passed by the Lok Adalat' In view of the above' this Motor Accident Civil 2. Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Award passed by the Lok Adalat' There shall be no order as to costs' l) As a sequel, miscellaneous applications' if any' pendi shall stand closed', ,,TRUE COPY" Sd,. L. VIJAY ASSISTANT REG TRAR SECTION OFFICER ;tllffi';'Upf*fit"riiil*311tsd{*trriffi:'{::S'H" 3. One CC to SRI' CHETLURU SREENTVAS Advocate TOPUCI 4. Two CD CoPies - *Li il"pv ir r-"rt Adalath A*'ard ) t ^,"'^* : \.- -' , HIGH COURT DAfED:241O1t202'.5 JT]DGMI,]NT MACMA.No.1007 of 2019 '( 11 .ITATE 1 v o .a 1',] [,hfl 2s6 \ . ,.t), \ ""' i\ ,.} ;o n.: -- :'r if ''" ,., -'.-.:: : -1' -' "' DISPOSING OF THii \,IACMA IN TERMS OI, T.IIII AWARI) WII-IIOIJI (-]( )STS { / l CentraI Act)] BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE tiidn counr FoR rHE srArE oFTELANGANA'. HYDERABAD) ihe Legal Services Authorities Act' 1987 ( [Under S".tiJ"'i s "f ,i l1-r 5 C)o * Date: 1 4-12-20?4 Present: 1 . Hon'bte Mrs. Justice S'Nanda, (Judge, High court for the State of Telangana) Chairman
2.'5ri K.Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate' Member
3. Sri Srinivasa Srikdnth, Advocate, Member MACMA. No.10 07 of2O19 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST O.P.No.1414 of 2009 (On the fite of the XX, Addt. ffifJua-ge-cum+efore the Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunat: City Criminat Court: at Hyderabad) Between: in" N"* lndia Assurance Company Limited' n"p. Uv its Branch Manager, 202, Moghal Courtstsultolng' ;##Jd;;;, iv;erabai. etticv' Ho' Zt o t 03 t 31 t ob t 01 t 000041 42' ...Appellant/R2 AND
1. E. Veera Raju, S/o- SanYasi Rao, " ;3 y;;;;, ilc: Govt service, R/o' Quarter No' 8/2' Kevs Personnel qr.*"ri, rtris, N"'" f'rO Line' Langarhouse' Hyderabad'
2. V.iuiatha, D/o. E.Veera Raju, Ase:-31 vears, Occu: HouseWife, n7o. qritt"t ilo 8/2, Keys Personn.et.Quarters' MES, New MD Line, Langarhouse' Hy9:ra!11 3. G.Swapna, D/o. E'Veera Raju, Age: zu years' " o:.;;'H#e wife, R/o. Quart'er t'lo 8/2' Keys Personnel Quarters' - iliil u"* rtlo Line, Langarhoyie, Hvfef!]d;. ..^^ +. if,iuu Yadav,S/o. E.Veera Raju, Aged about, 25 years' Occ: Pvt. Service (Student), R/o' qualgf No 6/z' Keys Person net q""";:' ;ili; NL*- rr'ro Li ne' {Resoondents No. Z and i not'necessary parties in this petition) s. U'i"rffiir, ;io. c. t-lrnur.uluh, Aged: Major'- . . " -' il;;;;iihe vehicl'e bearing \o' {e--:t--v--p]ti, i)' i t - ii zl z, Kondapur, Hvderabad' R' R' District' 6. C.iaxmaiah, S/o. Komuraiah' Aged:4Z yearsl. .... " ;;;;i the accident Lorry, R/o' Sudhappal'ty Vittage' .Lan iaianirarttryMandat,WarangatDistrict' garhouse' Hvderabad' ...Respondents/petrs.1 to4&R-1,3 k\'-11--- s i AWARD .{a 1' This is an erppeal fited by the Appettant/ Insurance compa.r,7 chattenging the .order datecl ',rB-09-2012 passed in op.No.1414 of 2009 by r:he XXil Addt. chief Judge-cum- before the Motor Accidents ctaims Tribunat: c.ity Criminat court: at Hyderabac . 2' sri Raja Vadlamudi, Regional Manager - the authorized representative of Appeltant/ I rs urance Company, has appeared and represented that the lnsurance company decided not to pursue the present appeat and therefore they are wil.hdrawing the appeat.
3. The said representation is recorded and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the judgment and decree of tre court/Tribunat below. The amount, if any, remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be deposited by the lnsurance company within one month from the date of receipt of tlre award, along with interest. Tribunat/MAC'f.
4. on such deposit, the Respondent/ctaimant(s) is/are perrnitted to withdraw his/her/their respective amount/s as per the awarc passed by the 5' In case, thr: parties subsequentty come to know abour- fiting of cross they are given tiberty to seeli recatt of this appeat/cross objection, Order/Awarcr.
6. Court fee pa.d on this appeat shatt be refunded. 7. No costs. pt EqEB-qr se+t d;. it; For The New lndia rance Co (i ARrs-d cfrRftl , .. DULY CONSTITTID ATTOENSY Appettant/Respondent No. 2 lnsurance Com pan {r.J. A CHAIFWTAN M ER Xc'U-* MEMBEC tee ) s .r O C) of the C +rot 'Lcr + "a, |:|:...1-':