The High Court · 2025

(Respondents No.17 to 31 added asperorderof the court dated 19-12-58 in Appl'No.127158 as Defendants No D-4(a) to D-4(o) in C S.No 7/1958 and d6iendant No.4(k) appointed guardian.

33.(D-5). lftekharuddin Khan, (deceased) per Legal Representatives iiespondents No.33 to 38 ds Defendants No.D-5(a) to D-5(0' 3a. (D-5(a) Janaba Azizunnisa Begum, (Died), Wo Late lftekharuddin Khan' 35.(D-s(b). Janaba Ghouseunnisa Begum, D/o Late lftekharuddin Khan, aged iuort 7z years, R/o. Roshan Vihar' Santoshnagar, Hyderabad'

36. (D-5(c). Nawab Khamruddin Khan, S/o Late lftekharuddin Khan, aged about -- )-0;;;;t, Ric. u.r'ro.rz-t-sos, Asmajahi Tombs, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad' 37. (D-s(d). Janaba Shoukathunnisa Begum, D/o Late lftekharuddin Khan' aged - ;b",i468 y;is, R/o. H.No.5-g-246t1-, chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hvderabad' 38. (D-5(e). Nawad Akbaruddin Khan, Sio Late lftekharuddin Khan, aged about -- bo vilit, oi".-gusln"ts, R/o.. H.No.17-1 -3ot4l1 , Eidi Bazaar, Ramachandra Nagar, Hyderabad.

39. (D-s(f). Janaba Khairunnisa Begum, D/o Late lftekharuddin Khan, age.d about -- bZ y;;E, o;i HoJi.hoto, R/o-Roshan Vihar, santoshnagar' Hvderabad

40. (D-6. Ahmeduddin Khan, (Died) per L'Rs.' Respondents No 40 to 49' 41. (D-6(a). Janaba Afzalunnisa Begum, (Died), Wo Late Ahmeduddin Khan' '- 42.(D-6b\.JanabaViqarunnisaBegum,D/oLateAhmeduddinKhan.agedabout b5 G;*, o; uori"nora, R/o fi No.16-1 1-234, Judges colony, Malakpet' Hyderabad.

43. (D-6(c). Janaba Hameedunnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmeduddin Khan, aged - )u"''iifjs vJ*i, oCi Housenold, Ri; opp. Farhath Nursing Home, saleem Nagar Colony. HYderabad.

44. (D-6(d) Nawab lVlohd. Khaja Moinuddin Khan, S/o Late Ahmr:duddin Khan, aged abou:6C years, Occ. Business, R/o. Flat No.301, Pleasant Park Apartments, rihantinagar Colony, Hyderabad. a5 (D-6(e). Na'ruab Mohd. Nizamuddin Khan, S/o Late Ahmedudlin Khan, aged about 58 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No.'19-2-1371B1106, Kirlapathar, Bilalnagar, Hy,Jerabad. 46 (D-6(0 Janaba Yousufunnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmeduddin Khan, aged about 56 years, Occ. Household, R/o H. No.19-2-1371B.1106, l(alapathar, Bilalnagar, 1-lyderabad. a7. (D 6(9). JanaL,a Haseebunnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmeduddirr Khan, aged about 54 years, Occ. Household, Rio. H.No.19-2-1371B.1106, Kalapathar, Bilalnagar, ilyderabad.

48. (D-6(h). Janaba lrlagerunnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmeduddin Khan, aged about 52 years, Occ. Household, R/o. Flat No.301, Pleasant lrark Apartments, Shantinaga r (lolony, Masabtank, Hyderabad.

49. (D-6(i). Narvab lvlohd. Rafiuddin, Sio Late Ahmeduddin Khan aged about 50 years. Occ Business, R/o. Saleemnagar Colony, Hyderabad

50. (D-6U). Janaba Nikhathunnisa Begum, D/o Late Ahmeduddin Khan, aged about 48 yearu;, Occ. Household, R/o Flat No.301, Pleasant F:'ark Apartments, Shantinaga ' Colony, Masabtank, Hyderabad. (Respondents No.40 to 49 are added as Defendant No.D-6(a)to (1) in Appl.No.73l2'30 in C.S.No.7/1958 vide order dated2-2-2000, being the legal representatives of deceased Defendant No.6 Adhmeduddin K.han 51 .(D-7). Afsaruddin Khan, (Died) per L.Rs., Respondents No 5'l to 53

52.(D-7(a). Janaba Basheer Banu, Dio Late Afsaruddin Khan. ag;ed about 58 years. Occ. l-'rousehold, R/o H.No.'16-2-7011 , Shnkar Bazaar. Gaddianaram, R. R. District 53 (D-7(b) Janaba Vigar Banu, D/o Late Afsaruddin Khan, aged about 35 years, Occ. Household, R/o H.No.16-2-7011, Shnkar Bazaar, Gaddianaram, R. R. D istrict. 5a.(D-7(c). Nawab Jahangiruddin Khan, S/o Late Afsaruddin Khzrn, aged about 34 years, Ocr;. Business, R/o. H.No.16-2-7011 , Shnkar Bazaar, Gaddianaram, R. R. District (Responderrts No.5'1 to 53 are added as Defendants No.D-7(a) to (c) in Appl. No.72,t2000 in C.S.No.7/1958 vide order dated 2-2-200C, being the legal representaliver; of deceased Defendant No.7 Afsaruddin Kharr.

55. (D-8). lqbal,-rd0in Khan, (Died), S/o Late Nawab Moinuddorvla Bahadur.

56. (D-9). Wajihuddin Khan, (Died), per L.Rs., Respondents No.56 to 64.

57. (D-9(a). Janaba Fareedunnisa Begum, (Died), Wo Wajihuddin Khan. 58 (D-g(b) Nawab Afzaluddin Khan, S/o Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 66 years, Occ. Business Rlo 751A, Katedhan, Shiviampally, R.R.Diitrict.

59. (D-g(c). Nawab Azeemuddin Khan, S/o Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 68 yea,i,'Rlo 22-5-484, Panjeshah, Hyderabad.

60. (D-g(d). Nawab Yousufuddin Khan, S/o Waiihuddin Khan, aged about 58 yeari,'Oce. Business, R/o H-No.19-3-2621215, Jahanuma, Hyderabad' 61. (D-g(e). Janaba Viqarunnisa Beoum, D/o Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 62 - i"ris, bcc. Houseliold, R/o H.N-o 8-5-11i2. Uddamgadda, Bandlaguda, R. R. District.

62. (D-g(fl. Janaba SaYeedunrtisa Begum, D/o Wajihuddin Khan, aged about 54 -- i.rii, Occ Housefrold, Rio H.No3-5-11/2, Uddamgadda, Bandlaguda, R.R.District.

63. (D-9(q). Nawab Asifuddin Khan, S/o Wajihuddin Khan, aged abo-ul5Q Ve9rs, -- O"J'"er.iness. R/o H.No.8-5-11t2,Udd1mgadda, Bandlaguda, R R District' 64. (D-g(h). Nawab Moinuddin Khan, s/o wajihuddin Khan, aged about 52 years, - b1"'fior."hold, R/o H.No.4-75lA, Katedhan, Shivrampally, R R'District 65. (D-g(i). Janaba Parwarunnisa Begum @ Jahandarunnisa PgSyt'',?{9 -,-- Wa;iirLOOin Khan, aged about 66 years, Occ. Household. Rio Lord Mansron' Lalapet, Hyderabad. (Resoondents No.55 to 64 are added as Defendants No D-9(a) to (i) in Aoot.tto.zzlzoo0 in c.s No.7/1958 vide order dated 2-2-2OOO. being the regat representatives of deceased Defendant No 9 Wajihuddin Khan'

66. (D-10). Bahauddin Khan, (died) per L.Rs. Respondents No 6 to 69' 67. (D-10(a). Janaba Mahaboob Begum, Wo Late Bahauddin Khan, aged about - b? v"iii, ocC. ttit, R/o. H No.12:1-584/8, Asifnagar, Hyderabad'

68. (D-10(b). Nawab Runuddiri Khan, S/o Late. Bahauddin Khan, aged about 66 years, R/o. H. No.12-1-584/8. Asifnagar' Hyderabad'

69.(D-10(c). Nawab Yousufuddin Khan, (Died) S/o Late Bahauddin Khan' 70. (D-10(d). Janaba Panvarishunnisa Begum @ Mohammedunnisaa Begum' - tlvlo Lrt'u. arhiuddin Khan, aged about 6+ years, occ Household, R/o H.No.12- 1-5B4l8,Asifnagar, Hyderabad. /Resoondents No.66 to 69 are added as Defendants No D- 10(a) to (d) in x.""iir.il.7ilooiiin iipresentatives of deceased Defendant No.'10 Bahauddin Khan' zlr 958 vide order dated 2-2-2000. being the legal -c.s.No

71.(D-11). Badaruddin Khan, (died) per L.Rs., Respondents No.71 to 74' 72.(D-11(a). Janaba Asmatunnisa Begum, (Died), Wo Late Badaruddin Khan' 73. (D-1 1(b)' Nawab Naseeruddin Khan, S/o Late Badaruddin Khan, aged about - b-A ,";i, Oic. Business, R/o H.No- 1-8-506/55, New Prakashnagar' Be!umpet, HYderabad.

74.(D-1 I (c). Janaba Ameerunnisa Begu1,-Q/o^ L-al--e^Badaruddin Khan'.aged ' ' looiitio'v."it, o"". uouierrou, R/6. H.No 3-5-7821521a11, King Koti' Hyderabad.

75.(D-11(d) Janaba Qamarunnisa Begum, D/o Late Badaruddin Khan. aoed about 50 yeiars. Occ. Household, R7o tt.tlo.t_B_SOOISS f.few f;ra[rif,n"rdrr, Begumpet, lly,derabad. (Respondents No.71 to 74 are added as Defendants No.D-1.1 ,a) to (d) in App1.No.72l 2000 in C.S.No.7/1958 vide order dated 2_2-200j,'Oeirig'the legal representatives of deceased Defendant No.1 'r Badarudcrin rrrJi -

76. Nawab [/ohrl. .talaaluddin Khan D-12, (Died). 77 (D-13). Nawabr Zainulabeddin Khan, (Died), Sio Late Nawab t\,loinuddowla Bahadur, Per _ Rs.. Respondents tto.ZZ to tOe, 78 (D-13(a) Janaba yousufunnisa Begum (Died), Wo Late Naw;rb Zainulabeddrn Khan. 79 (D 13(b) Ta,Vyaba,Beguq, Wo Nawab Zainulabeddin Khan, aged about 75 H

80. (D-13(c) Narvab Mohd. Abdur Barkath Khan, s/o Nawab Zarntrrabeddin Khan. years, Ucc l-Jousehold, R/o H.No.17_5-399, Dabilpura, Hydera"bad. aqed about {j5 \/ears. Occ. Landtord. R/o H.No .12_1_513 L;i;i;;l, - Secunderab ld.' B1 (D-13(d) Narvab tr/ohd. Fareeduddin Khan, s/o Nawab Zainurabeddin Khan aged about 63 vears. occ. Landrord, R/o H.No.2o-J-iite, Kril". stir;;hiii Umra. Shahquit, Hvderabad. S2 (?-1-99),Janaba Younusunnisa, Begum, D/o Nawab Zainulabeddin Khan, aged about 61 years. Occ. Landlordl Rlo t-l trto.tZ_t-513 L;h ret, " -"' Secunderabad'

83. (D-13(0 Nawao lr/ohd Naseeruddin Khan (Died), S/o Late Nar,vab Zainutabeddin (han, per L Rs , (D_13 rfil io iJff r rl 84 (D-13(F-1) J:rnaba lVrahaboobu n n isa Begurn, wo Late Nawab N/rohd. Naseeruddir (,ran, aqed about 6.1 y.rr.IOc". ft*sehold, R/o H.No.12_1_ 512. Mahboob Vlansa'ion, S."rieirbr; -* ""' aged about 5'l vears, occ Htusehoto -il" Mansaion, Secrrrrderabad. 85 (D-13(F-2) J;naba Atiya Begum, Wo Late Nawab Mohd. Naseeruddin Khan r-rL.i".iz_i:diz, rrrrri,"O",ld 86 (P 13^(F-3| Naw;rb Mohd. Abdul Fateh Khan, (Died), per L.Rs., Respondents No.86 to 89 87 (D-13(F-3(a). ,Azrnath Fathima, W/o Nawab Mohd. Abdul Fateh Khan. aoed about 35 years, occ Househoid, nio. frNo iz_i_siZ lrtrr.,[""i'ffiUi";: Secunderabad.

88.(D 13(F-3(b)- .Zainabunnisa aged about 1. 1) years, Occ Stuteni, fr/inor nepreienteO Uy OuirOian Aazmath Fathin-a Mother, R/o U trto ti f _St Z-,'tvt-r-n-OooO friun., onl Secunderabari. ^B9o.um, D/o Nawab Mohd. Abdur F;rteh Khan, -"'

89. (D-13(F-3(c). Kashifunnisa pgg.ur, D/o Nawab Mohd. Abdul Fateh Khan, aged about 1r vears. occ stu-deni, Mro'. c"pr".-"nteo oy cuJrJiin'Alzhaflr Fathima Mothe.i Rro u ruo. rz-Gi ),'M;;d,;;[' M;saion, Secu,rderabad.

90. (D-l3(F-3(d). Khadarunnisa Begum, D/o Nawab t\ilohd Abdul Fateh Khan' "" )"""J;uJJitj vLJr.. oC" Stude"nt. trinor Represented by G_uardian Aazmath f-atnima [\Ioth6r. R/o H.No. 1 2-1-5 1 2, Mahboob Mansaion, Secunderabao' q1 (D-13tF-4) Nawab Mohd. Zainul Mutakheen Khan, S/o Late Nawab Mohd' "' iGtJ*OOi" fr,"., ag"d iOout 40 years, Occ Landlord, R/o H No 12-1-512' Mahboob Mansaion, Secunderabad.

92.(D-13(F-5). Nawab Mohd. Ruknuddin Khan' S/o Late Nawab Mohd' -- iG."*OOin Khan, agedibort 27 y"rr", occ Landlord, R/o' H No"l2-1-512' Mahboob Mansaion, Secunderabad.

93. (D-13(F-6). Nawab Mohd. lsmailuddin Khan, S/o Late Nawab Mohd' "" iGtr-'roJin rnrn, ug"d ioout 23 years, Occ Landlord, R/o H No 12-1-512' Mahboob Mansaion, Secunderabad.

94. (D-13(F-7). Nawab Mohd. Zainulabeddin Khan, Sio Late Nawab Mohd' " ' iGdJroii" rrran, ageo joout 20 years, occ student, R/o H No 12-1-512' Mahboob Mansaion, Secunderabad

95.(D-13(F-8.). Ameenunnisa Begum, D/o Late Nawab Mohd Naseruddin Khan' "" )i"o Inrri za v"riJ. oCc Stident, R/o. H No 12-1-512 lvlahboob Mansaion' Secunderabad.

96. (D-13(F-9). Bilqeesunnisa Begum, D/o Late Nawab lvlohd Naseruddin Khan' -- )q"d )uo,1t 26 years, occ Ho"usehold, R/o H No 12-1-512, Mahboob IvLnsaion, Secunderabad.

97. (D-13(F-1 0). Humeraunnisa Begum. D/o Late Nawab lvlohd Naseruddin - kf,un,'ug"i about24 y"rrs Oci. Student, R/o H No 12-1-512' Mahboob Mansaion, Secunderabad.

98. (D-13(F-1 '1 ). Anees Fathima Begum. D/o Late Nawab Mohd Naseruddin "" k"n""',''rsli itj"riie yei,t. o""1 student, R/o H'No '12-1-5'12' Mahboob Mansaion, Secunderabad. qq(D-13(o-'l).tvlohd.BasheeruddinAhmed,H/oLateNafeesunnisaBegum' "" )"g"J)"ooli os v"ro, occ Business, R/o H No 12-1-511/2' Mahboob Mansaion, Secunderabad. 100, ''"A.grr, (D-13(g-2) Nawab t\tlohd. Daveruddin [han, S/o Late Nafeesunnisa ,g"i-aObut +Z ylars, Occ. Business, R/o H No 12-1-51'll2' Mahboob Mahsaion, Secunderabad. '"'aqed ID-13ro-3) tttlohd. Siraiuddin Ahmed, S/o Lae Nafeesunnisa Begum' v6"r.. o".. Btliiness, R/o H No '12-1-51 1/2' Mahboob M-ansaion, Secunderabad. "b-ortiB

102. (D-13(g-a). Janaba Wajahathunnisa Begum, D/o Lae Nafeesunnisa '-A"orrl 44 vears,'Occ. Household, R/o H No 12-1-5'1 1/2'

103. '""a"orrn'. trla"hboob I/ansaion. Secunderabad. "o.d"aubut (D-13(g-5). Janaba Qadeerunnisa Begum, P/o Lae Nafeesunnisa "q"d"aubut sB y;ars, occ. Househo-id, R/o H No '12-1-51112' It/a-hboob I/ansaion, Secunderabad.

104. (D-13(g-6). Ayesha Bano Ahmed, D/o Late, Nafeesunnisa. Begum'.aged ''lOout i+ v#it, O."1 r-ror.uhotO, R/o H.No.12-1-51'112, Mahboob Mansaion' Secunderabad. ([e;pondents No.77 to-'l03 are added as Defendants No. D_ r3(a) to (0, D_ 13(F-1 to F-'l I and D 13(g-il to (G-6) being the legat r.epr".",itjt*ei'bi deceased I_)efendant No.1 3 ZainulabeOain (frln '105.. lP-l+t Ghaziuddin Khan, S/o lateNawab Moinuddowl:,r Bahadur. aoed about 76 years,, occ. Landtord, R/o H No.8_i_6e6li6)b7. Hir; N;j;, ""-" Banjara Hilr:;. liyderabad. 106.. (D-15) '/y'arisuddin Khan, s/o rate Nawab Moinuddowra Bahadur. aoed "G i;, Br;Y;; about.74 years, occ. Landtord R/o KNo.8_i_6soiiolorz, ri"Ji Hills, Hyderabad.

107. 108. 109. .. .. (D-1 B). rzzathunnisa Be.gum {Died) D/o Late rVloinudd<:wra Bahadur (D-1ti). I:areedunnisa Begum, (Died), unmariied and issueless. (D-1 z), l-ayeequnnisa Begum, (Died), D/o Late lvroinud cowra Bahadur. (died) per L Rs Respondents tio.tdS to if i - *-

110. (D tB(q) Janaba Liyaqathunnisa Begum, D/o lzzathunrisa Begum, aged about 6C years. Occ.-HouseholA, Rlo kat<atiyanagar. ruanalnagZi,", Hyderabad

111. Beg um. (D-18'b) Janaba Zeenathunnisa Begum (Died), D/o Late lzzathunnisa 112^ (D-18(c), Janaba Tahniyathunnisa Begum, D/o Late lzz,athunnisa "- Begum, aged about 58 years, bcc Housetroia, nlo U r.ro-r o;,,ir O, Bazaargua.d. Vlallepally, Hyderabad. - -- (Respondenls No.109 to. 11i ale added as Defendants No.D_tB(a) to (c) in Appl.No.731200rl in C S.No 7/_-lgsa vioe oroeioatJi_2_i000 5s;g'iA",r;grr representatives of deceased Defendant No. t A iiiitnunntsa uegum.

113. (D-19r iftehkarunnisa Begum (Died), D/o Late lVoinuddrwra Bahadur. 114.. lD-20r t allika Jahan. B9g,.l.l, D/o Late IVtoinuddowta Bahadur. aoed about 78 years occ Househotdl Rd H N;), s;il. F;;'j;r;;,i;:Lii;#Xiiir, Hyderabad. 115.. . lP-Zll Akthar Jahan. Bg.gr.l1, D/o Late tvtoinuddowta Bahadur. aoed about z6 years occ Househotdl nro H.ruo )s_i_"ri3- A.d;'""r; jfi;Xtlj;ffi;th Charminar, F,yclerabad. 1'16.. !?-22) Dawoodunnisa ggglr,D/o Late lVloinuddowla Bahadur. aoed about z 2 vea.s,lcc Houserrotal R/o. Snriiia. cirrroir"r;i!;;;il" .r=" Hyderabad. 117 'I 1B 119 120 121 .

122. (D-23) Mahboobunnisa Begum (D-24) lRaheemunnisa Begum, (D-25) Ladli Begum (deceased) per L.Rs, (D-25 (a) Kutsum Begum, (D-25 (b) IVtirza Bakar Ati, (D-25 (,:) Mirza LiakatAati Baig,

123. 124

130. 131 .

132. '133.

134. ' '135. 136

137. 138

147. (D-25 (d). Moinuddin Khan, (D-25 ( e). Sultanuddin Khan, (D-26). Liaqat Begum, (D-27). Famed Jahan Begum, (D-28), Sultana Begum, (D-29) Gulam Mohammed, (D-30) Mansab Jung, (D-31 ) Shaik Mohiuddin, (D-32). William Ceaser, (D-33). Mahboob Khan, (D-34). Shamsuddin Khan (D-35). Govind Rao (D-36). Sridhara Rao (D-37). Jayarao Sambrahani (D-38). N.K.Guruswamy (D-39). Dr.E N.Das (D-40). Sahebzada Dildar Ali Khan (D-41). Syed Waliullah Hussaini (D-42). Ameenuddin Hussaini (D-43). Hyderabad Development Cooperative Society (D-44). Colonel Ali Raza, (D-45). Syed Ali Abbas, (D-46). C.S.Venkat Rao (D-47). Jagir Administrator, Government of Andhra Pradesh (D-48). Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh (D-49). Hari Prasad, No Address

148. 14g. Nawab Sabir Lutfuddin Khan, S/o Late Nawab Si9j9!Qi1 KLan, aged ' -aUout aZ v..r", Occ. Private Service' R/o H.No'6-3-1'102, Hidden Treasure Apartmenis, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.

150. '"]"rt., Janab Fatima Khan, D/o Late Nawab Sirajuddin Khan, aged.about 36 Oic. Uousenotd, R/o H.No.6-3-'1 '102, Hidrien Treasure Apartments' Somajiguda, HYderabad. (Respondents No.148 to 149 are impleaded as gefendants No-3(g) and 3(h) i-io" 6l.Oer. dated 13-09-2013 in Appl.No.838/2013 in C S'No 7/1958' 151 . Nawab r\bdul Rahman Khan, S/o Late Nawab ShahiduCdin Khan, aged about 42 yeiars, Occ. Business, Rlo. Aziz Bagh Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad

152. Nawab llasan NoorLLddin Khan, S/o Late Nawab ShahiCuddin Khan, g.ged about :3S) years, Occ. Business, Rlo Aziz Bagh Colony T olichowki, Hyderabad. (Respondents No 159 and 151 are impleaded as Defendants irlo 3(i) and 3o vide orders dated 13-09-20'13 in Appt.No.B3Bt2O13 in C.S No.Z/19d6.

153. Janarra Sumera lmran, D/o Late Janaba lnteqabunnisa Begum, aged about 28 years Occ. Household, Rio. Mud fort, Sec-bad.

154. Janab,a Saba Nasir, Dio Late Janaba lnteqabunnisa Begum, aged about 26 years. 0cc. Household, R/o Mud fort, Sdc-bad.

155. Janaba Sara Naseer, D/o Late Janaba lnteqabunnisa Begum, aged aboul24 years, Occ. Household, Rio Mud fort, Sec-bad. (Respondents No.152 to 154 are rmpleaded as Defendants N(..3(k). 3(1) and 3(m) vide orders dated 13-09-20i3 ih Appt.No.838/2013 in C S, r.jo.7tre5& -

156. Nawab \4ohd. Fareeduddin Khan, S/o Late Nawab lqba uddin Khan, aged.about 64 years. Occ. Landtord, R/o. H.No..t6_2 ZOSAle, q[bar Aigh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.

157. Janaha lr4oununnisa Begum, D/o Late Nawab lqbaluddirr Kha.n beino the legal heir and representativ-e of Nawab lqbaluddin knrn S o fri" H,frnl 9_9-9owl9, aged 61 years, Occ. Landtord. Rto.3_5_7B2l1016, G,rf_bunoalow. 1rn9 -K-g!h] Swl66NG. Ergland, U.K. Hvderabad R/o 7A Bank Building, Mitcham Lane L ondon- 159, Janab;r lqbalunnisa Begum, D/o Late Nawab lqbaluddin Khan. beino the legal heir and representative of Nawab tqbatuddin'Khi; S;" L;i; M;i; lr.9 Dgyl?, aged 56 years, Occ Landtord Rto3_S_782t10/6. Gaf_bungatow. Kind Kothi. Hyderabad. 15q . Nawah t/ajeeduddin Khan. S/o Late Nawab lqbaluddin t(han. beino the regar herr and representative of Nawab lqbaluddin Klian, s/o Lirte Moin-ud'- -- P.9Il3, ,,S99.13 years, Occ Landtord, Rto 16-2_ZOst1la, nr.Oai e"Sn- Malakpet, Hyderabad. (Respondentsi No.155 to 'l S^8 8(d) vide orders dated 13-09-20.13 in Appt.No.83St2O13in C S rVo it.fgse. _a1e lmpleaded as Defendants No D_g(a) to D_ Nawab lt4ohd. Rishad Uddin Khan, S/o Late Nawab youri;ufuddin Khan bout 30 years, Occ. Accountant, presenfly nlo p O eoi ea10, Dubji, represenled by GPA Holder Nawab Mohd. Khaleemuddin Khan vide' Nawab Mohd. Kareemuddin Khan, s/o Late Nawab yousufuddin Khan aged about 2l' vears. Occ. Student, Rlo 12_2_24,ii, SyeOif tgrJa, Asiiiri;g;;:' Hyderabad.

162. Janaba Sameera Begum, D/o Late Nawab yousufuddin t(han aoed g.Oqut e! years, Occ. House-wife, Rto 12-2_24t1, Syedarigrai, n;iin;;'r;, Hyderabad. 160 aged a U,A,E. No. 161

163. Janaba Sara Begum, Dio Late Nawab Yousufuddin Khan aged about 23 years, Occ. Housewife, Rlo. 12-2-2411, Syedaliguda, Asif Nagar, Hyderabad. (Resoondents No. 1 59 to 162 are impleaded as Defendants No.D11 0]9). !o- Q- i Oir'i"iO" orders dated 13-09-2013 in Appl.No.838/201 3 in C.S.No 71 1958 - 164.NawabMohd.SikendaruddinKhan,S/oLateNawabMohd.Jalaluddin Khan, ag"O 5+ years, Occ. Landlord, R/o. Hussaini Heights, FIat No'202, Humayun Nagar, HYderabad. (RespondentsNo.l63isimpleadedas-DefendantsNo.l2(a)vileordersdated i l-og-zot a in Appl.No S3B/20'13 in c.s.No.711958-

165. Nawab Khusro KamalPasha' S/o Late Janaba Layeequnnisa Pg-S1l'' - iged about 68 years, Occ. Landlord' permanent resident of Rio 5-9-24611, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, HYderabad.

166. Nawab Ali Bin Hamid, S/o Late Zeenatunnisa Begum, aged 32 years' Occ. Landlord, R/o H.No.'1 1-2-585, Habeeb Nagar, Nampally, Hyderabad' t 167. Nawab Jaffar Bin Harnid, S/o Late Zeenatunnisa Begum, aged 30 years, Occ. Landlord, R/o H-No.1 1-2-585, Habeeb Nagar, Nampally' Hyderabad. -

168. '-l"rrt, Janaba Sumihaunnisa Hamid' D/o Late Zeenatunnisa Begu-m, aged 37 0cc. Landlady, R/o H.No.'1 1-2-585, Habeeb Nagar, Nampally, Hyderabad. '169. Janaba Hassa Humid, D/o Late Zeenatunnisa Begum, aged.34 years' Occ. Landlady, R/o. H.No.'1 l-2-585, Habeeb Nagar, Nampally, HyderaDad (Respondents No.165 to 168 are impleaded.as ^D^efendants \o.D.18-(!)^t9^D- iAigi"id" orders dated 1 3-09-2013 in Appl.No S3B/201 3 in C S No T/'1958' 17O. Nawab Ali Bin Saleh, H/o Late Janaba lftekarunnisa Begum,-ag-ed 70 " l.rr., ijii.-i""ouJv,-Rio. b-+-a+lsg, Plot No.99, Kakativa Nagar, Tolichowki' Hyderabad. (ResoondentsNo'l69iSimpleadedasDefendantsNo.lg(a)videordersdated ie- oe-zota in AppLNo B3B12013in C S-No.7/l958.

171. Nawab tvlohd. Ghaziudin Khan, (D14 in C S No-7158) Sfo-Late Nawab '' 'fvfoinrO-Oo*ia, aged 75 years, Occ. Lahdlord, R/o' 8-2-686i 16lDl2' Baniara Hills, Hyderabad.

172.NawabMohd-WarisuddinKhan,(D15inCS'No7/58)S.lo.^La!eNawab ''HloinuA-Oowfa,agedT4years,Occ.Landlord,Rio8-2-686/'16lDl2'Banjaa Hills, Hyderabad. (ResoondentsNo.,lT0andlTlareoriginalasDefendants.No.l4andl5and itso L.R"., of Defendant No.19 being her brothers)' lT3.Mr.Mohd.AbdulHussain,S/o.LateMohammedAbdulWaheed'aged " luout i) vJiii, oC". eusiness, Rto.4-114, Errakunta, Kothapet Village' R.R.District -5.

174. Syeo Rafath Sayeed, S/o Occ. Business R/o H.No.2-3-50 ^Sy.g{ Hyderabad -13r Gul3m Rasool aged a:out 42 years,

8. Ahhay Plaza, Flat No 305, Amberp'et, (Respondents No.'172 and 173 are impreaded as Defendants No.148 and 14g vide orders dated '13-09-2013 in Appt.No.83Bt2O13 in C S tto 7t1gSB. 175 years, l//b Hyder flllulSlmaO K[qn,.9lg L-ate Hakeem Mohd Abdutrah Khan, aged 57 Ucc. tslsiness, R/o H.No.20-3-41211 , Moosa Bowli, Hy,ierabadl j{gT:"!rX!lrh Shareef S/o Late Mohd. Manzoor Shareef, aged J / years, Ucc. Business, R/o. H.No.20_3-393; I\Ioosa Bowli, " 177 ,19. .. ^9r^"0 Ahmed r\kramullah Shareef, S{g !a!e Mohd. I\rlanzoor {:ihareef, aged 42years Occ. Advocate, R/o H.No.20-3_396 lVloosa B,>wli, flybeiiOad Azhar S/o Sfed Hyd.er, aged about 50 years, Ocr;. Business, R/o H.No.2o-3-212t 1, fi/oosa i3owli,' Hyderibad. (Respondents No.1Z4to 172 are impleaded as Defendants N<.,.150 to 153 vide orders dated 13-09_2013 in Appt.No.BSa/iOfJ in C S No :/i958. -- 179 M/s. l nish Construction Co, Represented by its proprie:trix, Smt. Nirmata D. .)/o Shree Digambar nao Aaving'trre ofti"".,i? i_lo'oI Airiu Mall. Abids llycterabad -i. ,80;-, .-,[y_[\{,rtrr;:lly Aided Co-operative Society, Represented I,y its president ' rfl. sflpao Lleshpande. S/o Late Sri M.G.Deslipancie. aged aO ius qZ V"lL, Occ. Business Havino rhe office at nat f.to.Zti pterruit er* Ap,r;;;G, Shantinaga r,to:ony, Second CroJ. R;;;.-HyArao"ao _za 181^ ^ -. N!/g, -tyA Bari, Advocate, Receiver_cum_Commissioner i-r C.S No.7/1958 llavino the office at H.tto I I_3_OZZ, tvo.qr" Rr:ad, New Mallepally, Hyderabad 182 U,5 Mall . . W:,. ^B_ ^Sl-,y", Sunder Rao, Advocate, Receiver_cum_Cc,mmissioner in No 7/1958 llaving the office at H No 11_3-621 [,/".qr; Rc,ad, New epally, Hyde rabad. ( Respondents 2 to 122 and 175 and 1175 to i 82 are formal par..ties) ...RESPONDENTS/ Receive r-cu m-C r:mm issioners . _ . Aggrieved hy the order dt 1g.Og.2013 of the Honble Mr. Justice A Rajasheker Reddy. passed in Apprication No. 856 of 2013 in cS No. 7 l.A. NO:3 oF 20171APPL. NO: 5972 oF 20171 isi8 "r Petition under section-151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suoport of the petition, tire "ff igh Court may be pleased l.A. NO: 3 OF 2016 (APPL. NO : 8743 OF 2016) Petition under section '15'1 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment and Decree dated 19 09 2013 passed in Appin No 856 ;f 2013 in C S No 7 of 1958, pending disposal of the Appeal, in the interest of justice and Pass l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(APPL. NO: 1208 0F 2016) Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in thb circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to condone the delay of 182 days in filing the Appeal in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellants: ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL (TG) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P.V.S.K. GHAKRAVARTHY The Court delivered the following Judgment: THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SU.IOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN I{UMAR O.S.A. No.8 ol'2O1 8 in Application No.856 of 2O13 in C .S. No.7 of 1958 JUDGMENT (Prtr the Hon'ble Sn Justice N.V. Shrauan Kumar) The learn:l Additional Advocate General for tl-re appr:llants Mr Chak"rrvarthy P.V.S.K, learned counsel for the re,spondents This Orlginal Side Appeal has been filed under C.ause 15 of Letters Patent aggrieved by the order dated 19.09.2013 pessed by the Iearned Srngie.lrl6lgs of this Court in Applicalion No.856 ol 2013 in C.S. No.7 ol 1(,5t 2 . The app, :llants herein submits that they are thr: r espondents No.182, 183 an< 184 and the respondent No.t hcrein rs Lhe petitioner in Application l\rr 856 oi 2OI3 in C.S. No.7 of 195g.

3. For thc stke of convenience, the parties hereinalter rvill be relerred to as the\r are arrayed in the present appeal i.e. ;\ppellants/ Respondents anr I respondents / petitioners.

4. The l?es,o 'rclent/ petitioner has hled Application No.g56 of 2013 in C.S. No.7 of J 958 seeking to pass hnal decree in far our of the respondents/ p,- L tioners rn respect of the land measurll ig Ac. 1 .00 of Shamsiguda village, Balanga Mandal, R.R. District, bei;-rg part of Item No.252 of schedule A,annr:xed to the preliminary der:rr:. i'r c.S. No.7 of lgsg and to direct the Receivers- guntas in 51.NIo.57 \ 2 HAC,J&NVS[(,J ApPlicauon No,856 df20 13 cum Commissioners to deliver the physical possession of the land measuring Ac. 1.OO guntans ln Sy.No.57 of S1-ramsiguda village , Balanagar Mandal, R.R. district as sho.vn in thc schedule and plar-t The learned Single Judge vide order dated 19.09'2013 allowed 5. the application to the extent of passing final decrbe only Assailing thc same, the appellants/ respondcnts filed the present appeal on the following grounds:

1. The order passed in application No 856 of 2013 seeking final decree in respect of Acre 1-O0 in Sy No'57 of Shamshiguda village, Balangar Mandal, R.R. District is contrary to law and facl-s and is liable to be set aside'

2. The learned Judge ought to have secn that while seeking up final clecree, the State was necessary party to the proceedings since the properties in respect of which hnal decree was claimed is vested with the Governme nt' consequent upon abolishing of Jagirs'

3. The learned Judge ought to have secrr that by making an endorsement that Stal-e was not a necessary party to the proceedings, causes serious prejudice to the interest of the State.

4. The learned Judge ought to have appreciated that had notice been given to the State appropriate claim would have been made in respect of thc ProPCilY.

5. The learned Judge ought to have seen that there was no material available on record to arrive at a conclusion as to the nature of the property and claims by third parties uis the State. \"* ) ril\c,J&Nvsri,J OSA No.8 oI20l7 ,\p .l.aron No.856 0i20t3

6. The lerrned Judge ought to have issued ,r",i.. o';d;'$i;i., so as i () enable the State to place before the Cou..t that there is no specific mention of Sy.No.57 of Shamshigu,la vi age in any of .he schedules to the preliminary decree zrnd that the final Cecree could not have been passed when the prelirn'nary decree does not mention the survey number. 7, The l(r:rrned Judge ought to have issued a notice to the State so as, t,) enable the State to place before the Courl that as per the scttlement tender revenue records of KukatprLlli the land is re<:or<led as "poramboke Sarkari,,-

8. The r:orclusion arrived by the learned Single .lu lge that no objecr iot'r was expressed by Counsei for al .orving the appli,. a tion on the ground that they have entr red into a comprc rnise is erroneous since no notice has bec n issued to the Stat(-'.

9. The orcer under challenge is not reasoned order

6. Heard the learncd counsel for the parties and p,:rused the matcrizrl nract: rlr zrilable on the record.

7. For ltett,:r- appreciation, it is necessary to excerpt the order dated 19.09.2Cr1.t passed in Application No.856 of 2O13 ir C.S. No.7 of 1958 by the le;rrned Single Judge. "Th js is an application filed Under Order 20 Rule 18 OI(1., r/w Section 146 artd. 151 CpC to pass a final decree in favour of the petitioner to and Ext,rnr of Ac. l.OO guntas, in Sy.No.57 ol. Sharnshiguda Village, Balangar Mandal, Ranga Redrll District, on payment of requisite stamp t ,,/ 4 H C,J&NVSK,J osA. No 6 0t 2017 Applidtioa No.856 of 2013 c.S No.7 st 1954 duty and <lirect t1le Receiver-cum-Cornmissioner to deliver tire physical possession of the land It is stated that already paper publicatlon is ordered in Application I'{o.495 of 2009 and the sarne was published and hled in the Court' Thereafter, the Commissioner hled his report on t7.o7.2009. The lcarned counsel for thc respondents have no objection in allowing the application since they havc entcred into a cornPromise' Sri M.A. Bari, Learned Senior Counscl, Receiver- cum Commissioner also submits that he has no objection for passing a frnal decree' In vicw of the averments stated in the afhdavit frled in support of this application ancl since there is no objection from anybody, this application is allowed to the extent of passing hnal decree only- Sri M.A. Bari, Senior Counsel, who is Receiver- cum-Comrnissioner is entitled to rcceivc the remuneration at the rate of 2%o on thc value of thc property and the applicants are directed to pay the sarne at the tirne of delivery of possession of the property."

8. The aforesaid order was followed by the decree dated 19.09.20i3 drafted in Application No'856 of 2013 in C'S' l{o 7 of 1958, which reads as under: "1. That the Civii Suit C'S' No'7/ 1958 is a suit for partition and separate possession respect of the Matruka properties of Late Nawab Moinduddowla \ \ 5 II,\C,J&NVSIi,J App c ro. No..a56 oI20l3 c s No'7 oi rss. Bai-rtrrlur, forming paigah Asmajahi. The Honble Hi3! Court has passed a preliminar5r dccree in C.l:i. No.7/ 1958 on 6-4-1959 by virtue of a conryr:-omise, under which the plaintiff and Def'e:riant No. t have received the cash, malsions, url:an propertres and securities, therefore the shr;rr: of Defendants No.2 to 22 are determined, lrrl.,jrnq rhem entitled to receive their shares in all othlr sult schedule properties including the prcrpr:r [ies shown in item No.230 to 254 of sctrerhtle "A" annexed to the prelimina_ry decree,

2.'I':rrt the property in Sy.No.57 of Shamsigr-rda vitl.Li_l:. Balar-rgar Mandai, R.R. District is part of itern l'{o.252 of schedule "A,, appended to the prelirtLnary decree, which is Matmka properties of Mo nr1;1d61y12 Bahadur, wherein the Defendants No..l tc 22 are held entitled to receive the due shar.c in terms of the preliminary decree rn C.S. No. r-l 1958. The Chief Commissioner Lald Acirnitr stration, Govt., of A.p., submitted a report to rhc Government of Andhra pradesh Revenuc i)c1:,.rrLrncnt, A.P. Secretariat vide CCLA LIl..\.lr:'iA2/2O6l2OO9 dated 22_02-20tO. con lilrrring thar the land in Sy.No.57 of Sharn; guda village, is a private patta land belc;rE;rng to Pa,igah Asmajahi which have become hnal:

3. Th: t the Petitioner who has purchased the lancl mea:;uring Ac.2-OO Gts., in Sy.No.57 of Sha:ns;iguda Village, Balanagar Mandal, R.R. Dislri(r, being part of item No.252 of Schedule .,A,, appen(i,ld to the preliminar5z decree, from the Delerrc zu'rts No.15, 12, A, a, rc, 20, 21, 22 and the lergal heirs of Defendants No.3, 4, S, 6, T , g, lO 6 Applicarion No.a56 of 2013 C.S. No.7 o{ 1958 & 11, was brought on record as Defendar-rt in C.S. No.7/1958, and is entitled to get the frnal decree passed in his favour'

4. That as per the orders of the Hon'b1e High Court in App1.No.495/2009 in C.S. No.7 of 1958, the Receivers-cum-Commissioners have submitted the scheme of partition along with' the plan, dividing the property in Sy.No.57 of Shamsiguda Village, by metes and bounds among the share holders and the Petitioner being thc alienee pendent lite, was accommodated hirn in the scheme of partition, being bonafide purchaser specihcally allotting Ac.2-00 Gts., of land to the petitioner being the pur-chaser from the share holders, and shown in the plan by metes ald bounds.

5. That the land allotted to the Petitioner by the Receivers-cum-Comrnissioners under the scheme of partition, is under the physical possession of the Respondents No.178 & 179 herein, and the Petitioner and the Respondents No. 178 &' 179 have amicably settled the matter and the Petitioner is allotted Ac.1-00 Gts, in Sy.No.57 of Shamsiguda Village, which is specihcally shown in the schedule and plan annexed hercto.

6. That by virtue of the purchase and in view of the above settlement the Petitioner is entitled to this final d.ecree to an extent of Ac.1-OO Gts., only out of Sy.No.S7 of Shamsiguda Village. This Court upon observing that the applicalt issued notice vide substitute service ald since there is no objection from anybody, doth order and decree as follows:- \ \ \ \ I 7 HAC,J&NVSK,J osA. No.a ot2017 Ap! rca(ion No 856 oI20t3 C s No.7 oI 1958 I . '1'h e applicant be and the same is hereby allor,.,,:d ar-rd a final decree be and hereby is passed rn f: r oLtr- of the Petitioner in respect of the la_nd mea jtrrng Ac.I 00 Cents., in Sy.No.57 of S1'rnsiguda Village, being the alienee pendent litr:, u'hich is shown in the schedule ald ihe plan in leC color appended to this frnal decree.

2. 'ilL:rt tl're Petrtioner be and hereby is declared as absohrte ourrer of the land measuring Ac.1-00 Cents., in Sy.No.57 of Shamsiguda Village, Bala-.ragar Mar-rdal, R.R. District being part of item No.2l2 of scl-redule "A" annexed to the preliminarlz dcr:rr r in C.S. No.7/ 1958.

3. l'l: L thc Sri M.A. Bari is entitled to receive the rer- ur er:rtion Qi,2ok on the va_Iue of the property;

4. 'l'hirr rhe applicant herein is directed to pay the ren'lureration at the time of deliver of possession of tht propcrty; and

5. 1-l-r tt thcre be no order as to costs." SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY ALLOTTED TO THE PETITIONER/FINAL DECREE HOLDER All t ttt land measuring Ac. 1-00 Gts., out of Sy. ,\lc . 17 of Shamsiguda Village, Balanagar Mar:clal, R.R. District, being part of item No.252 of sch:dL-lc "A" annexed to the preliminarJz decree in C.S. \r:.7/ 1958, more specihcally shown in the plal i r red color annexed hereto and bounded by:_ North Village boundary Rama Ram. of Gajula 8 Application No.a56 ol20l3 a-\ South : 40 feets wide road & lard allotted to Respondents No.172 & 173/Defendants No.148 & 149 in C.S. No.7/ i958. East : Part of Sy.No.57 of Shamsiguda Village West 40 feet wide Road & part of Sy.No.S7 of Shamsiguda.' g. On a perusal of the order passed by the iearned Single Judge' it is noticed that though the appellants, State, were made parties' it is spccifically mentioned that " (Respondents No l to 177, 182 to 184 are this applicrttion) and they are made as not necessary Parties to profonno parties."

10. In the ltnal clecree dated 19'09 2013, it is stated that the respondents/ petitioners purchased the land measuring Acs 2'O0 guntas in Sy.No.57 of Shamsiguda vi1lage, Balanagar \4andal' R R' District, being part of Item No.252 of Schedule "A" appended to the preliminary decree, from the Defendants No 15, 12, A' a' 19' 20' 2l' 22 and the legal heirs of Delendants No 3, 4, 5,6,7' 9' 10 & 11' who were brought on record as defendant in C'S No'7 of 1958' are entitled to get the fina1 decree in their favour' In the case on hand, though the appellants herein were made i i. party to the proceedings, it is specifically mentioned that they are not necessa4/ parties and they are made as proforma parties' As such' there was no occasion for the appellants herein to Iile their objections' \ \ 1 () IIAC,J&NVSK,J OSA No a oI2017 App lcariof No.a56 or 2013

12. The learrLed Single Judge in the order dated 19.09.2013 C S. No.7 ol1958 recorded that the appellants/ respondents had no objection in allowing the applicatiorl slnce they have entered into compromise lt is also observed that rLlready paper publication is ordered in Application No.495 ol 2OC') rrnd the same was published and iiled in the Court and thercalter. r I e Commissioner lilcd his report on I 7.07 2009. tt is further recorclerl that the learned Senior Counsel, Re,:eiver-cum- Commissioner a I so submits that he has no objection for passing a final decree. Flt <:orcling the above, the learned Single Jurtge allowed the application tt the extent o[ passing final decree only.

13. However, 1r. thc copy of the final decree, there is no mention or reference a[:ou I lhc compromisc of lhe appellar-r s herein, who representsl ltre State. In [he decretal copy, it is declar:d that the respondent/ pet ir i rner is the absolute owner of the subjr:ct land of Acs.1.00 cents irr Sv.No.57 of Shamshiguda village, Balangar Mandal, R.R. District br:irr1g part of item No.252 of schedule ,,A,, ar-rnr:xed to the preliminary de<:r,:,: in C.S. No.7 of 1958. It is further recorded that the respondent/ pe titioner has purchased the land measurinl3 Acs.2.00 guntas in Sv Nc.57 of Shamshiguda village, Balanagar Mandal, R.R. Districl.

14. At this jtLn,:ture, it is signihcant to note that the Divisrion Bench of this court vitle rrder dated 09.01.2025 closed the c.s. N< .7 of 195g wherein at par€r Irlo.36 observed as under: 10 HAC,J&IIVSK,J Application No as6 ot20l3 a) C.S. No 7 of l95a "36. On a perusal of the paragraph 4(g) of the preliminary decree dated 06.04.1959, it is evident that the defendant Nos.2 to 22 were entitied to the properties mentioned at item Nos.230 to 254 of Schedule A' annexed to thc preliminar5r decree, in case the sarne arc restored or released in favour of Asman Jairi Paigah. hr the instant case, admittcdly, therc is no material to indicate that the propelties mentioned at seria-l No.230 to 254 of Schedule 'A' to the preliminary decree have been restored or leleased in favour of Asman Jahi Paigal'r. It is pertinent to note that as per para 4(g) of the preliminary decrce dated 06.04.1959, the Commissioners-cum-Receivers have the power to sel1 the property by way of public auction and exercise all powers necessary for effecting the division of the sale bctween the defendants No 2 to 12 and 14 to 22. Accordingly, each son rvould get 2 133 arrd each daughter would get 1 / 33 in the propertics of Schedule 'A' except items 230 to 254 of the Schcdule and items of properties a'ilotted to the plair-rtiff. The defendant Nos.2 to 22 wlll get Lheir strarc, namely, each son getting 2/35 and each daughter getting 1/35 from the arrears of income future income, compensation or commutation or sale proceeds of the items 230 to 254 of Schedule A' detailed under the head of "Makthas" in case of the same are restored or released in favour of Paigah Asman Jahi "

15. The subject property under appeal is in respect of Item No'252 (Shamshiguda)ofSchedule.Aofthesuit.TheDivisionBenchofthis Court vide order dated 09.0L.2025 had closed the C'S' No 7 of 1958 wherein at Para No.4O it was observed that '?s such, the s bmissions \ \ 1 \ HAC,J&NVSK,J OSA. No 8 ot 2017 ,\pr ica.or No.856 or20l3 made on behotf of the objectors ore unsustainable and. i" :tii'Ji[i]'.f the matter, it t:ort safely be concluded that no lands are r.,.uailable for partition in itern Nos.230 to 254 of Schedule ,A' atta.hed- to the preliminory dccnze. In the absence of preliminary d.ecrze for item Nos.23O to 25.1 in Schedule ,A', no final decree could_ haue btzen passed. Therefore, relor's rtled earlier are withour proper ueriJication, are fictitious LLn (l the same are treated as nullity ancL ore hereby rejected."

16. It is to bc noted that the C.S. No.7 of 1958 u,as ,:losed with specific obser'.1i'r. that no lands are available for partitron in Item No.252 Schedr-L: A ancl the subject land i.e. admeasuring Acs.1.00 guntas in Sy.No.57 of Shamshiguda village of Schedule A,of the suit Balangar Mandai, Ranga Reddy District, is part of said Item No.252. ) ) I I

77. in vieu' of tl're above discrcpancies found in the ordr:r and the decree datecl M.C9.2013 ancl that the appeltants though ilrrayed as respondents No.182, 183 and 1g4 were shown as not necessary parties to the A polication No.g56 of 2O 13 and were made ar; proforma parties, the appr:.lants could not put forth their objections. As such, the order and lecree dated i9.09.2O13 is not binding on the appellants. l'h,at apart, taking into consideration th: specific observations made in C.S. No.7 of 19Sg that no lands are ar ailable for partition in Ilern Nos.230 to 254 of Schedule ,.A,, attached to the preliminary decrc e and in the absence of preliminarl. decre e for item Nos.23O to 2SZ n Schedule ,,A,,, no final decree could 1:ave been 12 IIAC,J&NVSK,J Appli@tion No-a56 ot 20r3 passed, hence impugned order and decre'e dated 19.09'2O13 passed in Appiication No.856 of 2O13 in C.S. No.7 of 1958 are hereby set aside'

18. Accordingly, this OSA. No.8 of 20 18 in Application No'856 of 2013 in C.S. No.7 of 1958 is a11owed. Horvever; it is rnade clear that this court tras not expressed any opinion oD the title or otherrvise of the appeliants herein. There shall be no order as to costs' As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPY// o SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO INT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER

1. M/s. M.A.Bari, Advocate, Receiver-cum-Commissioner in C.S.No.7/1 958 Having the office at H.No.11-3-627, Mosque Road, New li4allepally, Hyderabad.

2. M/s. B.Shyam Sunder Rao, Advocate, Receiver-cum-Commissioner in C.S.No.7/1958 Having the office at H.No.11-3-627, Mosque Road, New Mallepally, Hyderabad.

3. Two CCS to the Additional Advocate General, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

4. One CC to SRl. P.V.S.K. CHAKRAVARTHY, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies w \ HIGH COURT DATED:2110212025 JUDGMENT 1,, r4: ' ., .i, ?!25 t 1l :-c O.S.A NO: 8 OF 2018 in ADD lication N o. 856 of 2013 in C.S.No. 7 ,rf 1958 ALLOWING THE O.S.A NO: 8 OF 2018 in Application No. 856 of 2013 in C.S.No. 7 of 1958 WITHOUT COSTS 4a