Kamuni Chandramma v. Village, Mudigonda Mandal, Khammam District

Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Surya Balu Mahendra (No Representation) Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Raj Kiran, counsel representing Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL SECOND APPEAL No.1O42 of 2O18 JUDGMENT: None appears for the appellant. Even on the previous dates of hearing i.e., on 27.O7.2078, 1O.O8.2018, 29.O8.2025 and 06. 1O.2025, there was no representation for the appellant. Today, thor-rgh the matter was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal', none appeared for the appellant. Thus, it appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the mattcr vigilantll' and diligently any more, therefore, this second appeal is liable l-o bt: dismissed for non-prosecution.

2. Sri Raj Kiran, learned counsel representing Sri M.Rurjarnalla Reddy, learned counsel for the, respondents take no objeclion to the same.

3. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for non- prosecutron Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed To, //TRUE COPY/ SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD DEPUry REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The I Additional District Judge at Khammam The Senior Civil Judge at Khammam One CC to Sri Surya Balu Mahendra, Advocate [OpUC] One CC to Sri M. Rajamalla Reddy, Advocate tOpUCI Two CD Copies Kam/sa :: .'+",-:, ffi.sed I I HIGH COURT DATED i1311012025 I JUDGMENT SA.N o.1042 of 2018 'i HE ( o U 31tlt &t 'tr O/:1.,-."r.-,,.- t: {.' THE SA IS DISMISSED FOR NON.PROSECUTION q b