✦ High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Sep 2025
Length
1,172 words

Counsel for the Appellant: Sri P. Raja Sripathi Rao Counsel forthe Reqpondent No.3: Sri K. Ajay Kumar The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NT NDIKONDA M.A.C.M.A.No .2254 of2O!9 JUDGMENT: Pursualt to the request made by the Ie a ned counsel appearing for both the parties, the matter was lr ferred to Lok Adalat. On f7 -O7.2025, the matter was settled I efore the Lok Adalat and an award was passed by the Lok Adrr at' In view of the above, the M'A'C'M'A' is r isposed of in termsoftheaward,datedlT'07'2025'passr:ibytheLok Adaiat. There sha-Il be no order as to costs' As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions p nding' if any' sha1l stand closed. Sd/. C. DEEPIKA ASSII TANT REGISTRAR Li SECTION OFFICER /TTRUE COPY// To, Judoe, Karimnagar'

1. The Chairman Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cunl I , b]r",#i; d,iE n'i' sripathi Rao' Advocate' [oPUCl '. 5ii" 66 i" s. K Aiav Kumar ' 4. Two CD CoPies " iil#;; copv of Award passed bv Lok Adalat) Advocate loPuc] AS/kam Additionat District l I I 1 I .- r-,,. I ll: w \\- \ FrfEll I \ ., HIGH COURT DATED:2410912025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.2258 of 2019 5 i:q 1 1 :t8 20?[ z .C) c() + DISPOSED OFF IN TERMS OF AWARD PASSED BY LOK ADALAT U .1- F\ I BEFORE THE LOK ADA HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES c (HIGH CoURI FoR THE STATE OF TELANGAN IUnder Seclion l9 ollhe Legol Services Authorities 4.1, Date: 17 -07-2025 Present:1. Hon'ble Dr. Justice G. lFormer Judge of erstwhite Andh Chairman

2. Sri N.Anirudh, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A. No.2 258 of 2O19 (Before the Hon 'ble High Court) AGAINST esh High Court) o, *.*u,,r**&@roror r"n,* o-*nts cLaims Tribunat-r,,- ttaaot. oiriri.t Lrog", Karimnagar at' Jagtiat) Saa r'lc .t J r) * tbqiSX'Il lbe stare o11 n the fite Between: - Abdul Rasheed @ Ahmed Abdut Nayeem, $./p. Hameed, aged about 51 years, on: Business, R/o. Kotarta ProPe AND r and Mandat. ... Appettant/Petitioner 1 2 3 Co c Repr This a hearing the passed: Com pensation Awarded by the Tribuna[ jkumar, 5/o. Narsaiah, years, Occ: Driver of Car bearing No'AP -9-x-7241 ri Loca tity of MetPatti ProPer and MandaI 0wner of Car bearing No'AP-X-7241, , Kiran Apartments, Begumpet, Hyderabad. at lnsurance ComPanY Ltd", Karimnagar Branch, R/o. No.118 I, Iex, Occ: TetePhone Bhavan, Kariqlagar. ... Responflsnl/Respondents tioner Sri P. Raja Sripathi Rao 6 ?ii $:,l[it"Xfl xeddv, Advocate. mpany : for sett ies and D ;:#lfiTffi :,1'.-1'l j,':i"HT, lement before this Lok Adatat and after atso the parties, the fottowing award is Three takhs five thousand onty) atong and interest @ 7.5% per annum from date of reatization. cl\- c\ J t) ' -t BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMAAITI :E (HrGH COU RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA , HYDET BAD) lunder Seclion lg of lhe Legol Services Aulhorilies Acl. I t,t 7 (Centrot Act)l Date: 1 7-O7-2025 Present:1 . Hon'ble Dr. ,ustice G.r, rthiraiulu (Former Judge of erstwhile anor,, u ,iuo"ri,fr]gilcor.,; Cha irman !{: L!

2. Sri N.Anirudh, Advocate, Member tS,ll8x'xi t Staie o\ 1 the fite of Between:- AGAINST mf,:';L* -'o,nu,.,,' 1$fl'1' fljr|lih":d @ Ahmed Abdur Nayeem, Ha.rleedt aged abour 5t yeari, :1o-: uccupation: Business, R/o. Kotarta proper and Manri, r. . {ppellant/Petitioner ,. AND Rajkumar, S/o. Narsaiah, ^O^.llilrri Ageo about 36 vears. Occ.: Driver of tar bearing No., p_9_X_7241 R/o. chaitanyapuri Locarity oir,,r"ipu]n:'#";el il \ rndar. 2. Mrs. Gazata Baie, Owner of Car bearing No.Ap_X_72 { , - Y: Ground Ftoor, Kiran apartme;ir, teg"u;p"l,,, Hy terabad. 3. j-Cj! I Lombard General lnsurance Company Ltd... R/by its Branch Manaser, Kartmnagai New Annapurna comp-tex, or.ir.[pn"*;i#;; r( rimnasar. -Bi"i.-rr,"n7o. L. r r a, , Counsel for Appettant / petitioner : Counse[ for ReSpondent No.2/ : lnsurance Company Representative of lnsurance Company ... Resp,r ndent/Respondents Sri P. Raja Sripatti Rao & iilf ,Ifi"qliiix,I ,xl:: : Sri Mohammeri \bdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Legat Ctaims Advocate. This appeat having been hearing the Learned Counse[. fo passed: referred for sett[ement before r ris Lok Adatat and after r the parties and atso the partir: , the fottowing award is ompensation c Awarded by the Tribunat AWARD Rs. 3,05,000/ - (Rupees Three lakhs five with proportionate costs and interest (a the date of petition titt the date of reat 'rousand I onty) atong .5% per annum from i rtion. Compensation Award (Setttement Reached) in the Lok Adalat. .\ ,' a,-' ..r Agl'" -t< ^,1 LU.. -...)/ q\ Staie 2 This aPPeal has been fited bY the lnsurance ComP the order Passed in MVOP No.98 of 2008 bY the':' aggrieved bY Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accidents Ctaims Tribunal-cum-ll AddL. District Judge, Karimnagar at Jagtiat' The AppeLtanti Petitioner atong with his counsel and 5ri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager-Legal Claims for the Respondent No.3-lnsurance Company have appeared before the Lok Adatat' After negotiations' the Appettant/ Petitioner and the Respondent No'3-lnsurance Company reported that they have entered into comprornise and the matter is settted. As per the settlement' the Appettant / Petitioner has agreed to receive a sum of Rs.6,89,407/- (Rupees Six takhs eighty-nine thousand four hundred and seven onty) towards fuLt and final settlement in addition to the amount atready deposited and the lnsurance the same. AccordingtY, Company has agreed to PaY compromise is recorded and the case is settled before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above said setttement, the lnsurance Company has agreed to pay the above settted amount within a period of two (2) month from the date of receipt of copy of this Award, after deducting the amount that was deposited' if any. ln the event of defautt or deLay in making such deposit' entitted to ctaim interest as the Appettant/Petitioner is awarded bY the Tribunal. Apportionment of Com ensation if an Additional Direction(s): 1. The Appettant/ Petjtioner is entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid in this appeat' 2. The amount already deposited by the lnsurance company if any, shatt be given credit to' 3.SoonafterdepositbythelnsuranceCompany'theAppettant/Petitionerispermittedto withdraw the entire amount' ln token of consent for the above setttement and award' the parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence' ln terms of the compromise arrived at disposed of. between the parties, this case stands

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments