The High Court · 2025

Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of order in M.C.No. 361 of 2072, dt. 23.09.2017 on the file of the Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge For Trial of JHCBBBC-Cum-Addl. Family CourFCum-XlV Addl. Metropolitan Sessions fudge at Hyderabad in the interest of justice. IA NO:1 OF 2025 Petition unddr Section 528 of 528 of BNSS piaying that in the tirctinstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitioru the High Court may be plcased to expedite the hearing of the CRLRC.N o.1698/2018 by directing for early listing of mattcr. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri VSRMV.Prasad Sanaka. Counsel for the llespondent No.1: Sri A.Tulsi Raj Gokul. Counsel for the Respondent No.3: The Public Prosecutor. Crl.R.C.No.189 of 2014 Revision filed under Sections 397 &. 401, Cr.P.C. aggrie" <t by the order datei 02.12.2013 passed in Crl.A.No.518 of 2011 on the file of the V ^ lditional Metropolitan Sessiors Judge (Mahila Court) at Hyderabad. Berween: 1. K.Shiv Kumar, S/o Sanyasi Rao, aged about 35 years, occ Prir': I I employee. 2. K.Sanyasi Rao, S/o K.Tataiah, aged about 64 years, occ -Nil. 3. K.Laxmi, W/o Sanyasi Rao, aged abott 62 years, occ Nil. (S1.No.1 to 3 are R/o Rangapuram(V) Keesara Mandal, R-R.District ) 4. K.Satyana.ayana, S/o Sanyasi Rao, aged aborlt tl4 years/ (rcc Br.ir irress. 5. K.Venkateswara Rao, s/o sanyasi [iao, aged about 41 years, 'cc Employee in Postal (srNo.4 to 5 are R/o H No l-e-278l4e/B/'r *r':I:gl,:Ilffi"i; Dept., "H3i,31fi3;fondents AND 1. Smt. K.Pranitha, W/o Shiva Kumar, aged about 25 years, occ FI' usewife R/oH.NO-1- 9-278 / 49/B/1, Balaii Nagar, Ramnagar, IJyderabad. .. F r ;pondent/Respondent

2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosec I or, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad- ...F t ;pondent/ Respondent I.A. NO: 7OF2074(CRLRC MI']. NO: 33-1 OF 2014) Petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the ciri r mstances stated in thc affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may br rleased to suspend thc order dt. O2-t2-20't3 passed in CrlA.NO.518/2011 on the 'ile of V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, (Mahila court) t{ydcrabad pendirl disposal of the abovt CRL.R.C. I.A. NO: 1OF 2015(CRLRC MP. NO: 107 OF 2015) Between: Smt. K.Pranitha, W/o Shiva Kumar, aged about 25 years, occ Hou;' wife R/oH.NO.1-9- 278/ 49/B/1., Balaji Nagar, Ramnagar, Hyderabad. ..Petitioner/1't Resp urdent/1st Respondent. And

1. K.Shiv Kumar, S/o Sanyasi Rao, aged about 35 years, occ P': rate employee. 2. K.Sanyasi Rao, S/o K-Tataiah, aged about 64 years, occ -Ni . 3. K.taxmi, W/o Sanyasi Rao, aged about 62 years, occ Nil. 4. K.Satyanarayana, S/o Sanyasi Rao, aged about tM years, oc,: Jusiness._' 5. K.Venkateswara Rao, S/ o Sanyasi Rao, aged about 41 year:, ccc Employee in Postal Dept.,

6. The State of Andhra Prar-lesh, Represented by its Public Pros 'cutor, High Court of Andfua Pradesh, Hyderabad. ..1'.r spondents/ Petitioncrs. ..:Respc'r dent/ 2nd Respondents. r Petition under Section 4E2 CI.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 06.02.2074 passed in Cr1.R.C.M.P.No. 334 of 2014 in Cr.P.C. No. 189 of2014. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP. NO: 1436 OF 207n Between: Smt. K.Pranitha, W/o Shiva Kumar, agcd about 25 years, occ Housewile R/oH.NO.1-9- 278 / 49 / B / 1, Bataii Nagar, Ramnagar, Hyderabad. ..Petitioner/1st Respondent/1.t Respondent. And 1 2 3 ,4 5 K.Shiv Kumar, S/o Sanyasi Rao, aged about 35 years, occ Private employee. K.Sanyasi Rao, S/o K.Tataiah, aged about 64 years, occ -Nil. K.Laxmi, W/o Sanyasi Rao, aged about 62 years, occ Nil. K.Satyanarayana, S/o Sanyasi Rao, aged about r14 years, occ Business. K.Venkateswara Rao, S/o Sanyasi Rao, aged about 41 years, occ Employee in Postal Dept., (Respondents 4 & 5 R/oH.NO.7-9-278/49/B/1, Balaji Nagar, Ramnagar, Hyderabacl.)

6. rhe state or Andhra pradesh, Represented 6}:fil$i:B{*::ff11"il;zno""t'"""'" Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. ... Respondent/2"d Respondent/2"d Respondent. Petition undcr Scction 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filcd in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacatc the interim order dt.6-2-2014 passed in CRI.R.C.M.P.No 334 of 2014 in Crl.R.C.No.189 of 2014 and dircct thc conccrnccl protection officer to restore the possession of thc pcrsonal effects of thc petitioner and thc shared household to the petitioner situated in first floor in the prenrises bearing 1-9-278/49/8/ 1, Balaji Nagar, Ramnagar, Hyderabad and to pass such othcr order or orders as this l{on'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri VSRMV-Prasad Sanaka Counsel for the Respondcnt No.1: Sri A.Tulsi Raj Gokul. Counsel for the Respondcnt No.3 in Crt.R.C.No.1698 of 2018 and Respondent No.2 in Crl.R.C.No.1B9 of 2074: The Public Prosecutor. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER Fi THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA EIIiVI EADA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.1698 of2018 a r d 189 of 2014 COMMON ORDER: Crl.R.C.No.1698 of 2018 is f,led by the petitr ner-respondent under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. seering t,, set aside the order dated 23.09.2017 passed in M.C.No.36 1 c, 2012 by the Iearned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge I rr the Trial of JHCBBC-cum-Additional Family Court Judge-cur -lX Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad. By the ir rpugned order, M.C. was allowed directing the petitioner-respondert to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- to respondent Nos.1 arr, 2 herein from the date of petition till the date of order and thereafter Rs.10,0001 to respondent No.1 and Rs.5,000/- to respondent No.2 lt was further directed that the arrears of maintenance shall be p,i id within three months.

2. Crl.R.C.No.189 of 2014 is filed by the petition_. s-respondents under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.p.C. seeking tt set aside the judgment dated 02.12.20't3 passed in Criminal ApSeal No.5ig of 2011 by the learned V Additional Metropolitan S;, )ssions Judge (Mahila Court), Hyderabad. By the impugned judgme I , the appellate Court granted protection order, residential or ler, monthly \ 2 maintenance of Rs.10,000/- from 27.06.201 1 arrd compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-, thereby modifying the ordei', dated 27.06.2011 passed in D.V.C.No.6:.' of 2010 by the learned iii Metropolitan Magis:iarc at llyderabad, wherein, the petitioner l,lo.1-husband was directed to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.1,0001 to respondent No.1-wife.

3. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as unofficial respondents that during the pendency of the present Criminal Revision Cases, the parties have compromised the matter. Since the parties are willing to enter into compromise, they were given a chance to settle the matter by app6aring before the Coordinator, tr4ediation Center, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad vide order daled 24.07.2025 passed by this Court

4. Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, Mr. Syed Obaid Quadri, Advocate, was appointed as a Mediator, Mediation Proceedings were conduCted and the Mediatioh wZs successful The Mediator submitted a report, dated 17.11.2025 to the Coordinator, t';lediation Center, Telangana High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, who in turn, submitted a report, r (' dated 17.11.2025 along with Memorandum of Full and Final Settlement Agreement, dated 17. 1 1.2025 to that rr ,ect stating that the Mediation was successfui and the parties havr signed on the Memorandum of Understanding with free v.,!!1, cons:nt and without any force or coercion. I i I

5. Perused the Memorandum of Full and : nal Setflement Agreement, dated 17.11.2025 which disclose that t le parties have willingly consented for compromise with the follcving terms and conditions: 1) K-Siva Kumar agreed to pay an amount of Rs.4 t,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Eight Lakhs) by setting the f't t No_gg, admeasuring 200.00 Sq.yds in Sy.Nos.254 attr 2SS of Rampally Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchat-Ma kajgiri to KPranitha and K.Venkata Sal as a full and final s )t ement. The said K.Shiva Kumar will comptete the entil process within one month from today i.e_ 17.12.2025. 2) Smt. K.Pranitha agreed to withdraw/ permit to ( )mpound cases filed by her against K.Shiva kumar and , is famity members which are pending before the Hon,bte Hiq Court in Crl.R.C.No.31 1/2!22, Crl.R.C.No.320/2022, Crt.R.C No.1 698/ 2018 and Crl.R.Q-No.189/2014 and other related: rses filed by her. . 3) Smt.K.Pranitha agreed mutuatty for obtaining ) vorce by Mutual Consent or mutual which has been penci g before Hon'ble High Court in F.C.A.No.1tB/2019 or new F(\ tp witt be filed as per their convenience. 4) Smt. K.Pranitha and K.Venkata Sai who rs. son c K_ Shiya kumar and K.Pranitha atso not claimed any mainterv nce from K.Shiva Kumar. 4 fl, 5) Whereas Smt.K-Pranitha and K.Shiva Kumar herein have agreed to live separately at their will anc' wish and do not interfere with each other's life and that eithe: Smt.K-Pranitha and K.Shiva {.umar should not file or proceed *ith any legal tssues /tke Criminat Cases, CrVrT Cases, Domestic t'lolence Cases or any other cases agarnst each other or their farn:? n -)nbers including the Maintenance Case in future against K.Shiva Kumar herein. Smt K.Pranitha and K.Shiva Kumar also agreed that they will not harass each other under any circumstances in future. 6) Both Smt. K.Pranitha and K.Shiva Kumar have agreed to file duly signed petitions, after allowing the same fair copy of mutual consent petition and other necessary petitions and affidavits for compounding in criminal cases filed by K.Pranitha.

6. ln view of the above and considering the report, dated

17.11.2025, both the Criminal Revision Cases are allowed. The order dated 23.09.2017 passed in M.C.No.361 o'f 2012 by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of JHCBBC-cum-Additional Family Court Judge-cum-lX Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad and the judgment dated

02.12.2013 passed in Criminal Appeal No.51B of 2011 by the learned V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge (Mahila Court) Hyderabad, modifying the order, daled 27.06.2011 passed in D.V.C.No.69 of 2010 by the learned lll Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad, are hereby set aside, subject io the petitioner-husband paying an amount of Rs.5,0001 (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Commiftee, High Court for the 5 State of Telangana, Hyderabad and Rs.5,000/. (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Telangana Bar Associat r n, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and I le proof of the same before the Registry. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, sh r I stand closed / /TRUECOPY/ / SD/.T,VIJAY KUMAR R R To,

1. 2_

3. 4. 5.

6. The Additional Metropolitan Sessions |udge for the Trial or l{JCBBC-cum- Aclclitional Family Court-cum-IX Additional Metropolitar,cssions Jud ge, Hyclerabad. The V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge (Mahila C r r rt) at I'll,derabad One CC to Sri VSRMV Prasad Sanaka, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri A.Tulsi Raj Gokul, Advocate [OPUC] Tw,o CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the Stat: cf Telangana at Hl,cterabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies. Total Amount of Rs. 10,000/- ( Rupees Ten thousand onll r has been paid by Sri VSRMV Prasad Sanaka, Counsel for the Petitioner as directed 1r, the Hon'ble Court vidc order datcd 20-71-2025 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand onl. ) to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services CommittEe,Ei[h Cotrt for the State of Te[, ngana, Hvderabad and Rs. 5,000,2- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana Ba: Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No.737953 of 2025 rl; ted 01-12-2025. JCKIrsi- fu-, HIGHCOURT DATED:2l/77/2025 p COMMON ORDER CRLRC.No.169B of 2018 and 189 of 2014 ( STA I 2 il trfl 2t]2[ Z. C) * .sFa Both the Criminal Revision cases are allowed. -Jt<s lslzle-e