The High Court · 2025

4. Smt. Kamalannagari Ananda, W/o K.Sridhar, Aged 62 Years, R/o filedak Town.

5. Smt. A/anga Suvarna, Wlo Krishna Goud, Aged 37 Years, Rl/o H.No.1-1-12, Fathe Nagar, fVledak Town.

6. Smt. Vuppunuthula Rajani, Wio [Vl.Srinivas Goud, Aged 28 Years, R/o H.No.1-76, Bonthapally, Jinnaram lt/andal, Presently R/o H.No.1-6-6411, J.N. Road, [Medak Town. Burugupally Nagaraju, S/o Late Narayana, Aged 47 Years, R/o H.No.1-3- 13/1, Fathe Nagar, tMedak Town. K.Swamy, S/o Gouraiah, Aged 35 Years, R/o H.No.1-9-125, Azampura, tMedak Town. B.

7. AND .....PETITIONERS

1. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

2. Joint Collector, fi/ledak District at Medak. 3. Revenue Divisional Officer, tVedak District at Medak. 4. The Tahsildar, fVledak ftrlandal, IMedak District. 5. fi/ohammed Khamruddin Khan, S/o Mohd. Gyasuddin Khan, Aged about 70 Years, R/o H.No.2-9-413, Jeelanigadda, [Vledak Town.

6. Khaja Sohail tMohiuddin, S/o Khaja Shujauddin, Aged about 27 Years, R/o H.No. 1-8-134, Pildiddi Locality,lVledak. (GPA Holder). 7 B Smt;Sayeedia@SayeedaBegum,W/oSharfuddin,Riot-.No.1-3-77122, Block No.3, Nledak Town' Sub-Registrar, tMedak. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'thel'lighcourtmaybe pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction' rnore particularly one in thenatureofwritoftMandamus,declaringtheproceeding:;issuedbythe4th Respondent i.e.(1)Proceedings No.B/2137t2017-25t10t2017 Dl'2511O12017 [8 Nos.l, and (2)Entries in Form 1-B (ROR) in respect of the lantl admeasuring Ac'7- 07 Gts in Survey No.531 situated at tMedak Town and District, belonging to the petitioners as void, illegal, nonest in law, without jurisdiction, violative of principlesofnaturaljustice,andalsoinviolationofArticlesl4and300-Aofthe Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the Respondents 2 lo 4 to delete the names of the Respondent No.5 from the Revenue Records and restore the names of the Petitioners' O:1 201 PM NO: 745 201 PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the 4th Respondent i'e' (1) Proceedings No.B/21 37t 2o1t-zdotzo17 Dt.25t1Ot2O17 [B Nos.], and (2) Entries in Form 1-B (RoR) in respect oitt'," land admeasuring Ac'7-07 Gts in S'rrvey No'531 situated at tVledak Town and District, belonging to the Petitioners' p':nding disposal of the writ petition I.A.NO:1 OF 2018 Between 1 2 lvlohammed Khamruddin Khan, S/o tMohd. Gyasuddin l(han' Aged about 70 V;;;,'nyo H.uo. z-g'+tz, Jeelanigadda, Medak Town' Khaia Sohail tMohiuddin, S/o Khaja S.frujq$^Oi.tl' Lgug arbout 27 Years' Rl/o ii. ill,::a- i C+, F irolooi Localitv, M-eo at<' (GPA Ho lder)' .....PETITIONERS/RESPONDENT Nos'5 & 6 AND

1. D.Satish Kumar, S/o D.Gopal, Aged 42 Years, R/o H.No.1-6-2616, J.N. Road, I\4edak Town.

2. K.Bhupathi Raju, S/o Late Laxminarayana, Aged 43 Years, Rio H.No.1-7- 841112, Brahman Street, tvledak Town.

3. N.Sangaiah, S/o Shivaiah, Aged 60 Years, R/o H.No.3-8-45, Bussagadda, lMedak Town.

4. Smt. Kamalannagari Ananda, W/o K.Sridhar, Aged 62 Years, R/o Medak Town.

5. Smt. lVanga Suvarna, W/o Krishna Goud, Aged 37 Years, R/o H.No.1-1- 12, Fathe Nagar, Medak Town.

6. Smt. Vuppunuthula Rajani, W/o tt/.Srinivas Goud, Aged 28 Years, R/o H.No.1-76, Bonthapally, Jinnaram [t/landal, Presently R/o H.No.1-6-6411, J.N. Road, Medak Town.

7. Burugupally Nagaraju, S/o Late Narayana, Aged 47 Years, R/o H.No.1-3- 13/1, Fathe Nagar, tVledak Town.

8. K.Swamy, S/o Gouraiah, Aged 35 Years, R/o H.No.1-9-125, Azampura, [Vedak Town. ...RESPONDENTSM/RIT PETITIONERS

9. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Telangana State.

10. Joint Collector, tvledak District at fttledak.

11. Revenue Divisional Officer, Medak District at lMedak.

12.The Tahsildar, tVledak fi/andal, tVedak District.

13. Smt. Sayeeda @ Sayeeda Begum, W/o Sharfuddin, R/o H.No.1 -3-77122, Block No.3, Medak Town. 1 4. Sub-Registrar, IVedak. (R- 13 is not necessary party in this petition) .....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 13-12-2017 made in WPMP.No.S1745 of 2017 in W.P.No. 41715 of 2017. |.A.NO:1 OF 2019 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to represent deceased late lVohammed Khamruddin Khan 1! (Sth Respondent herein) being the successor in the interest over the subject matter of the land in the above WPTMP No. 51745 of 2017 in WP No. 41715 of 2017 as well as in the WP No. 41715 of 2017. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K.GOVERDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Responderrt Nos.1 to 4 & 8 : GP FOR REVEIIUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6 : SRI L.PRABHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : - The Court made the following ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 4L7 15 of 2017 ORDER: In view of expiry of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Court directed the Registry to issue notices to the petitioners on 20.06.2025. When the matter is taken up hearing on 18.07.2025, as per the postal track report, it was observed that the noticc sent to petitioner No.1 returncd. unserved rt,ith a.n endorsement as 'adclressee left without instructions', notice sent to the petitioner No.2 returned. with an endorsement as 'refused', notice sent to petitioner No.3 was served, notice sent to the II It petitioner No.4 returned unserved with an endorsement as 'insufficient address'notices sent to the petitioner Nos'S to B were served.. In spite of service of notices to some of the petitioners, none appeared. on behalf of them on that day. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". 2 sr(,J W.P.No.41ZtS of 2OLT 2' Even today, when the matter is calred, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. [t seems that the petiti.ners are not interested to prosecute this case. 3. In view of the above circumstances; the writ petitio, is disnrissed for Non-pr.osecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

4. Pending rnisceflaneous appricati.ns, ir any in this petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR cSECTION OFFICER Hyderabad. [OUT]

1. Two ccs to GP FoR REVENUE, High couft for the Statr: of relangana at 2. one cc to SRI K.GOVERDHAN REDDY, Advocate [opt,c] 3. One CC to SRt L.PRABHAKAR REDDy, Advocate lbeUCj' 4. Two CD Copies To SA GJP b HIGH COURT DATED:0710812025 3 t= WP.No.41715 oI2 17 0 DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS. $ f^ 'i,lru..:-iiq ,4.- !', , ?[mu6 (r.(' * PA t