Bhimireddy Krishna Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI lA No. 3OF 2019 IN CRLP NO: 12356 OF 2017 Between:
1 . Bhimireddy Krishna Reddy S/o Ramachandra Reddy (A-2)
2. Thatiparthi Yellamanda Reddy S/o Raghava Reddy (A-5) *.- Petitioners/Accused AND 1. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature, for the State of Telangana and forthe State of A.P., Hyderabad. ---
2. M/s Shree Dulchand Chemicals Private Limited, 1-7 -227 to 23f,2 0 Floor, Shyam Towers, Paradise Circle, Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad-soo 003, rep. by its Executive Sri Pitla Balaraj, S/o P. Narsing Rao, Occ: Executive of the Company, R/o Secunderabad. Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the stay granted in Cd.P.No. 12356 of 2017 dated 26-12-2017 until further orders, pending disposal of CRLP No. 12356 of 2017 , on the file of the High Court. Crf .P.M.P.No. 137 17 ol 2017 z Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.106 ol 2017 on the file of the Court of the Vlll Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Erramanzil, Hyderabad, including appearance of the petitioners herein, pending ;disposal of Crl.P.No.12356 of 2017, on thefile of the llgJr€ourt. <-- The petrtion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein and the orders of the High Court dated 26-12-2017, 20-02-2018 and 26-4-2018 made in Cr.P.No.12366 o1 2017, and order dated: 02.7.2018 made in l.A No. 2 of 2018 in Crl.P No. 12366 of 2017, order dt. 06-09-2018 in lA No. 4 ol 2018 and order dt. 06-09-2018 in 11.10.2018 in l.A No. 4 ol 2018, order dated 3}-11-ffi6 and order dated 04-02-2019 made in l.A. No. 5 of 2018 and order dt. 15-03-2019 in l.A.No.2 of 2019 and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. Appadhara Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners, and of the Public Prosecutor (TG) for the Respondent No.1 , the Court made the following ORDER:- lnterim order granted earlier is extended for six weeks from today. lA is ordered accordingly. * .ll //TRUE COPY// s D/. M.MANJULA ASSIST ANTR ISTRAR for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
The Vlll Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Erramanzil, Hyderabad.
Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (TG), High Court, HyderaEd (OUT)
One CC to Sri S.Appadhara Reddy, Advocate (OPUCf 4. One spare copy. / HIGH COURT GSD, J DATED: 21-06-2019 ORDER lA No. 3 of 210t9 CRLP.No.12356 of 2017 INTERIM O]RDER EXTE\ DED i lHE S gCIAL 14 cEt 2 s Juil t[s t\\ztt o,J t -i c€sp.arcH€ o *
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Telangana High Court, on 21 Jun 2019. The bench was G SRI DEVI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.