High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of ,..RESPONDENTS WritofMandamusleclaringtheactionoftheRespondentsmoreparticularly Respondent No.4 herein in not implementing the Order vide Proceedings No.B11098/201 B, Dl2olo6t2o1B, by Transferring the Title in respect of All that the Agriculture Land in Sy.No.136 an extent of Ac'1-11 gts' 137 an extent of Ac.4-24 gts, 138 an extent of Ac.6-17 gts, 139 an extent of Ac'4-15 gts' 142 an extent of Ac.4-16 gts Totally Admeasuring Ac'21-03 gts by situated at Dandumailaram Village, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ' as illegal,arbitrary.inviolationofprinciplesofNaturalJusticebesidebeingin ViolationofRoR,ACtandconsequentlytodirecttherespondentl',lo'4hereinto Rectify the Revenue Records and implement the Transfer of Title as per the orders vide Proceedings No.B/1098/201 8, Dt.2oto6l2o1 8 issuerl by the 4th Respondent herein in respect of All that the Agriculture Land in Sy No 136 an extentofAc'1-11gts,137anextentofAc.4-24gts,138anextentofAc.6.17gts' l3ganextentofAc-4-,15gIs,142anextentofAc.4-16gtsTotallyAdmeasuring ;Ac.21-03gtssituatedatDandumailaramVillage,lbrahimpatnamMandal'Ranga Reddy District Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A. VIJAY BASKAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: Ms. SWETCHA, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY IIIRIT PETITToN No.4289 of 2O2S ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following reliel "....to bsue Wi| Order or direction more partianlarly one in the 2ature lf Wit of Mondomus declaring the aclion of the Respondents more particularly respond_eit No.4 herein in not impLementing the Order uid.e proceedings No.B/ 1O9g/2O jg dated. 2.0/06/2018 bg transfetring the Title in respect of AIL that the Agriculture Land in Sy.No.136 an ertent of Acl.li gts, 137 an erte of Ac.4.24 gts, 138 an ertent of Ac.6.17 gts, 159 on ertent of Ac.4.15 gts, 142 an ertent of Ac.4.16 gts Totallg Admeasuring -Ibrahimpotnai Ac.21.03 gts situated at Dandumailaram Village, Mqnd.al, Ranga Reddg District as illegal, arbitiary, in uiolation of pnnciples of Nahtral Justice beside being in uiotiiion of ROR ait a-nd consequentlg to direct the respond.ent No.4 herein to .Rectifu the Reuenue Records and implement the Transfer of fitle as pir the Orders uide Proceedings No.B/1O98/2Oj8 Dt 20/06/2A\8 issu:d. by the 41h respondent herein in respect of AII that the Agiculture Lond in Sy.No.136 an ertent of Ac1.1-1 gts, 137 an extent of Ac.4.24 gts, 138 an extent of Ac.6.17 gts, 159 an extent of Ac.4.15 gts, 142 an ertent of Ac.4.16 gts Toiallg Ad.measuing -Ibrahimpatnai. 4c.21.03 gts situated ot Dandumailaram Village, Mandal, Ranga Reddg Distict. . .."

2. Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that they are the owners arrd possessors of land in Sy.No.136 to an extent of Ac1.l1 gts, Sy.No.137 to an extent of Ac.4.24 gts, Sy.No.13B to an 2 extent of A<:.6.17 gts, Sy.No.139 to an extent of Ac.4.15 gts, Sy.No.142 to an extent of Ac.4.16 gts in total adrneasuring Ac.21.03 gts situated at Dandumailaram Village, Ibrahimpatnarn Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is further stated that petitioner No.2, along with others filed O.S.No.62 of 1976 before the District Munsiff at Ibrahimpatnam seeking for rectihcatron of Record of Rights over the suit. schedule property arrcl the said suit was decreed on 24.04.1976 in favour of the petitioners therein. It is further stated that when the said der:ree u/as not implemented, the petitioners have hled an application before the respondents seeking amendment of Records ol' Rights arl.d acting on the said application, respondent No.4 issued proceedings uide No.BI llt)98 /2ola, dated 20.C)6.20 18 for rectification of the entries and for implementation of the judgment and decree dated 2'1.O4.7976. The grievartce of the petitioners is that even after i'ssuance of the said proceedings by respondent No.4, no steps are taken by the respondent authorities for rectification of the entries in the revenue records and as such, they are not in a position to receive an r incentives being sanctioned by the Government under inverstment subsidies; and they have also submitted 3 application through appropriate module in Dharani portal to carry out the necessary corrections in the revenue records under the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2O2O (for short ,Act,2O2O,l.

4. Ms. Swetcha, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has not disputed the submission of application by the petitioners.

5. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met if respondent No.4 is directed to examine the case of the petitioners and if the petitioners satisfy all the requirements under the provisions of the Act, 2O2O and the circular instructions issued by CCLA uid.e Circular No. 1 of 2021, dated 15.01.2021 and Circular No. I of 2024, dated 28.02.2024, consider the same for rectification of the entries in the revenue records and if the petitioners are otherwise not entitled, the respondent authorities shali pass a reasoned order strictly in accordance w"ith law and communicate the same to the petitioners within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I ,L I I I i I I I I I 4

6. With t:re above observations, this Writ Pelition is disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pendin;1, if aly, shal1 stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/.A.V.S. PRASAD ^tt\:I:*t REGrsrRAR i.isuecironorncen --'.-: 1 To,

1. THE Principal Secretary (Revenue), Secretariat Building, T.S. Hyderabad. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Ranga Reddy District. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, lbrahimpatnam Division, Ranga Reddy District

4. THE TAHASILDAR, lbrahimptnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 5. One CC to SRl. A. VIJAY BASKAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at 7. Two CD Copies Hyderabad [OUT] BIM BS * HIGH COURT DATED:1410212025 t) ORDER WP.No.4289 of 2025 :=:::: 1. r: S14 re '(t (, 2 Jt-) * '../. I i I I I I l i I I i DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (grPt8 W