The High Court · 2025

8. Katna Sathyanarayana, S/o Pentaiah,.aged about 42 years, Occ Agrl., Caste Kurma (BCB), FYo Narsappaguda, Village of Kothur, Nandigama Mandal, Ranga Reddy Dist. g. Smt. Katna Yadamma, W/o Katna Sathyanarayana, Aged about 38 years, Occ Agrl, Caste Kurma (BCB), RJo Narsappaguda Village of Kothur, Nandigama Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

10. P. Ramesh Kumar, S/o Papaiah, aged about lvlajor, Occ lnspector of Police, Chanduru Police Station, Nalgonda District.

11.A. Prabhavathi, W/o Ravi, aged about 37 years, Occ Govt- Teacher, Rl/o Sal Ram Colony, Parigi Village and Mandal, Vikarabad Distrtct, Telangana. '12.A. Ravi, S/o Narayana, aged about 40 years, Occ Govt Teacher R/o Sai Ram Colony, Parigi Village and lvlandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana. 'l3.Sravahthi, W-/o Palepally Mallesh Kumar, presently aged about 18 years, Fl/o Sai Ram Colony, Parigi Village and lvlandal, Vikarabad District, Telangana. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lnrl circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, morc nature of Writ of lt4andamus declaring the action of the res 1 who examined i.e. L.W No. 1 to 13 but failed to file prop _. report in FIR No.226 of 2016 dated 07-10-20'16 on the fit( offences of Sec.4 to 6 of POCSCO Act 20i2 and under ser; the respondent No.10 to 12 as an accused in the C.C.No.4g: J.F.C.t\,'1. Parigi and not send the victim girt L,W..13 for mt:rti illegal, unjust, arbitrary, violative of A(. 21, principles cf consequently direct the respondents No. 2 to 4 to re-investie z 2016, dated 07-10-2016 P.S. Parigi and to fite additionat c l the respondent No. 10 to 12 as accused in C.C. No. 4g3 of offences under section 4 to 6 of POCSCO Act.,2012 alr directing the respondent No. 1 to 4 for sending the L.W.13 tr examination for asserting the repetitive sexual assault on I 2016 till date. r praying that in the High Court may be larticularly one in the ondents No. 3 and 4 charge sheet / final rf P.S. Parigi for the 176 IPC and omitting <'tf 2017 on the file of ;al examination is as natural justice, and te the FIR No. 226 of rrge sheet by adding 1017 and register the sec 376 IPC while ctim girl) for medical minor girl from May l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 50452 OF 20171 Petition under section 1si cpc praying that in the crrumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppcirt of the petition, the High court nrr, be pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 to 4 to re-investigate the FIR No. 226 t f 2016. dated 07-10- 2016 P.s Parigi and to file additional charge sheet by addi., the respondent No. 1o to 12 as accused in c.c. No. 483 of 2o1l and regist. the offences under section 4 to 6 of Pocsco Act., 2012 and sec 376 lp, while directing the respondent No. 1 to 4 for sending the L.w.13 (victim girl) fo- Iedrcal examination for asserting the repetitive sexual assault on the minor girl frc r tr/lay 2016 till date pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.L.NARASIMHA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: SRI R.LAXMIKANI H REDDy, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 TO 13: - The Court made the following: ORDER AGP FOR HONll: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI wRIT PETITION No.40 644 F 2017 ORDE R: This writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of constitution of India seeking the following reliefls:- -Zl, '... to issue an appropriatc uriq ordcr or direction mote particularly onc in thc nature of Writ of Manglmus_d-:clating the action of thc respondent Nos.3 and 4 who examined i.e., L.W.No.1- ro 1^l but failed t" nfJ p.rp". charge shect/final report in FIR No.226 of 2016, datcd 07 .10.2016 on the file of P.S. Patigi for rhe offences .f scc.4 to 6 of p6csco Act 20t2 a^d rrndcr Sec 376 IPC and omitting rhe resporrdcnt Nos.l0 to 12 as an accuscd in the C.C.No.483 of 2017 on the fite oiJ.f.C.M. patigi and nor se nd the victim gid L.W.tt for medical examination is as illcgaf uniust, arbirrary, \,iolarive of fua. principles of natural |u"ti"., a-lrd consequcnrlv dircct thc respondenrs No.2 to 4 to re_invcsrigatc the FIR No.j26 of 2016, d.tcd 07.10.20.16 p.S parigi and to filc adJitional chargc shect lry ,dd;"t t;; respondent No.l0 to 12 as accrrsed in C.C.No.4giof 201.1 ar.<l."gi.tJ. th" offenccs under section 4 to 6 of pOCSCO Acr 2012 and sec i?6 IpC l,hile directing the respondenr No.1 to 4 for scnding the I_.W_13 vicrim girl fot mcdical examination for asserting rh. repctiii*. scxual assarrlt on thc minor girl from Mav, 2016 till date an<l to pass...,, 2. Fleard Mr.G.L.Narasimha Rao, Iearned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Rlaxmilsanth Reddn leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.L to 4. 3 Leamed counsel for the petitioner submfus that the cause of action in the present writ petirion no longer survives for 2 \ adjudication and' therefore, seers dismissar of ttr writ peririon as infrucruous. 4 Learned fusistant Govemmenr pleader raise s no objection to the said submission.

5. Recording the submissions of both leamed : >unsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There sha[ b: no orderas ro costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if m,.i shall stand closed. SDr- P.C.SULEKHA DEVt ASS;I STANT NCCISTRRC //TRUE COPY// pne QC to SRt G L.NARAS Iy:-9g,t"cpF_on'i j< ji,r"JYllfrT"?hTI.,rT,S,Lo,J"r; Hyoerabad. IOUTI Two CD Copies ,,. /'q. SECTION OFFICER elangana, at To 1 2 3 PSK. TKS dt- I i : .j ; I HIGH COURT DATED:2410912025 ORDER WP.No.40644 o12017 4- t o aEiI ;41 /. l) * 2 Ef (. Crtl : DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS r( P ra\>