The High Court · 2025

14) Achhana Srinu, S/o.Venkataswamy, Aged:4s years, Oc: Agriculture, PJo. Damaracharla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri rthagudem District 15) KanchJ Srinu, S/o.Bheeraiah, Aged:55 years, Occ:Agr ( rlture, pJo. Damaracharla Village. Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri sthagudem District 16) Bommakanti Pullaiah, Aged:60 years, Occ:Agri(L r:ure, Vo. Damarachafla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal. Bhadradri .othagudem District 17) Bommakanti Babu, S/o.Brahmaiah. Aged:36 years, O(( Agriculture, PJo. Damaracharla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradr :othagudem District 18) Kanchu Bheeraiah, S/o.Mallaiah, Aged:60 years. Occ:Ag-i ulture, R/o. / Damaracharla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri'othagudem District 19) Achhana Lalaiah, S/o.I4allaiah, Aged:55 years, Occ:Ag.i rlture, R/o. Damaracharla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri :.othagudem District 20)Achhana Sarvaiah, S/o.Ajjaiah, Aged:60 years, Occ;Ag.i Jtture, R/o. Damaracharla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri .othagudem District 21) Kanakam Mallesh, S/o.Mallaiah, Aged:40 years, Occ:Agr.ulture, R/o. Damaracharla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri ,lothagudem . District 22) Chinthala Pullaiah, S/o.Gangaiah, Aged:55 years, Occ:A! r :rutture, R/0. ,-, Damaracharla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri,lothagudem District 23) Danne Baburao, S/o.Lingaiah, Aged:32 years, Occ:A9' :ulture, R/0.,- Damaracharla Village, Chandrugonda Mandal, Bhadradri .(othagudem District 24) Vemulapalll Panakalu, S/o.Venkateswarlu, Ag((:40 Occ:Agriculture, R/o. Iyyannapalem Village, Chandrugor;1a Bhadradri Kothagudem District \edts,7 lvla nda L, 25) Vipparla Pedda Venkateswartu, S/o.pullaiah, Ag€::50 Occ:Agriculture, R/o. Iyyannapalem Village, Chandrug() la Bhadradri Kothagudem District years, Manda, :lespondents i I I I ! I Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action action of the 6th Respondent in not taking action on the Petitioners report dt. 16.11.2017 which was sent to the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 through registered post seeking to take proper and appropriate action against the Respondent Nos. 7 to 25 for illegally entered in to their land by high handedly with beating and scolding in filthy language in the name of their caste though there is separate ad interim inlunction orders dated 13- Og-2O17 in 1.A.No.193 ot 2017 in O.S.No.208 of 2O17 and 13{9-2017 in 1.A.No.192 of 2O17 in O.S.No.207 of 2017 on the file of the Sub Divisional Magistrate and Special Assistant Agent to Government, Mobile Court at Bhadrachalam as being illegal, arbikary, unconstitutional and violation of Article 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent Nos 2-6 to forthwith to take action on Petitioners report dt. 16-11'2017 . |.A.NO:1 OF 2017 (WPMP.NO:515 30 0F 2017) / Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent Nos. 2 to 6 herein to forthwith to take action on Petitioners' report dt. 16-11-2017 and pass appropriate orders pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI PULLA RAO YELLANKI - Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 6 : SRt M.SRINIVAS, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 to 19 & 21 to 25 : - I Counsel for the Respondent No.2O : SRI P.RAMA SHARANA SHARMA--- The Court made the following OROER /' ---7 .!r \ \ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TI'KAR,I UJI WRIT PETTTION No.41549 0F 20L7 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of ( lonstitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- -action ".rt"t"d "...to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Directi') , more particularly one irl the nature of Writ of Mandamus, l( declare of the 6th Respondent in not taling z :tion on ihe action the Petitioners report dt' l6.Ll.2OL7 which was sel to the to take Respondent Nos- i to 4 through registered post seekirtl proper and appropriate action against th9 R99n9n!ent I [os' 7 to it to their land by high hanc t 1ly with iS for iUegrtii beating and scolding in hlthy language in the name of tt ::ir caste thougli there is separate ad interim injunction orders t rted 13- og-2017 in I.A.No.193 0f 2017 in o.S.No.208 0f 2017 ar t 13-09- 2Ol7 in I.A.No. 192 of 2Ol7 rn O.S.No.2O7 of 2Ol7 on 1 re filc of the Sub Divisiona-l MagisEate and Special Assistant r\gent to Government, Mobite Court at Bhadrachalam as beir I i-llegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Artic I 27 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the r: rpondent Nos. 2-6 to forthwith to take action on Petitioners repr t dt' 16- 1r1l-2OL7 and pass apPropriate orders..." .

2. Heard Mr.PulIa Rao Yellanki, learned cot't rsel for the petitioners and Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant. Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 tc ).

3. karned counsel for the petitioners submits -l of action in the present writ petition no longer at the cause survives for adjudication and, therefore, seeks dismissal of the writ petilion as infructuous. 4- Learned Assistant Government Pleader raist': no objection to the said submission. 2 5 Recording the submissions of both learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellarreous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SO/. SRI P. PONNA KR]SHNA SISTANT REGIST ECT]ON OFFICER Two CCs to GP FOR HOME , High Court for the S Hyderabad. TOUTJ One CC to SRI PULLA RAO YELLANKI , Advocate IoPUCI One CC to SRI P.RAMA SHARANA S HARMA , Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies Telangana at To 1

2. 3. 4. SA BMw HIGH COURT DATED:1311012025 ( r, ar€ 1 H I r) .-) ,l t t ;ru$ c. {' *- , : --=2 ORDER WP.No.41549 of 2017 ,9 \: DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS. a'.{"N(+ drffit