Smt.D.Parvathamma. Wo Shivanna v. S Ttrirupathaiah
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Two CD Copir:s kam/gh I HIGH COURT DATED:19 t0212025 EH1 4I .i. 1 APR 2025 )( \1 \ 2 \ * o \,ai). (-,,. \,, \. ORDER CRP.No.7367 of 2018 THE CRP IS DISMISSED AS WTHDRAWN a L
Judgment
Cause title
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CIVIL REVlsloN PETITION NO: 7367 OF 2018 Petition under Articre 227 0f rhe constitution of rndia assairing the order dated 05-11-20 r8 passed in LA.No.915 of 2o18 in o.p.No.633 of 2o12on the fire of the Court of the principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar. Between: Smt.D.Parvathamma. Wo Shivanna, Aged 3g years. Occ: Coolie, presenfly nil. R/o Tatikonda Viilage of Bhoothpur Mr';;;i rfr"ada"f,uBnagar oistrict. AND ...Revision Petitioner/petitioner_Claima nt 1 2 S Ttrirupathaiah, S/o penta.iah. Ag_e:_ 50years, Occ: Agriculture & Owner of the Tractor bearinq ruo. npzzrlrr"nlssr, d; il;;i;ila vilrase or Peddamandadi Mindat, Mahabubn;;;;b'iiili"i''"'""'' The Divisional lManaoer. National lnsurance Co. Ltd., DO_1, Opp: Cenkal Bank, Bank street, K6ti, 'Hyderabad. ...Respondents
/Respondents IA NO: 1 oF 2018 ' Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the peiitio;, ih" utgt Corrt ;;t ;'J["."u fay all further proceedings in op, hio.633 ot iolz on the file of the Hon, bre " Principal District Judge, Mihabubnagar District. Counsel for the petitioner: M-r. N-. Laxminarayana, counsel representing -
Mr. K. Venkatesh Gupta Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the fo owing: ORDER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKAR:AMJI cwIL R-EVISION PETITION No.7367 of 2()14
ORDER:
This Oivil Revision Petition has been filed lssailing the order riated 05.11.2018 in I.A.No.915 of 2018 in O.P.No.63ll of 2Ol2 on the frle of the Principa: District Judge, Mahabubnagar.
2. Mr. N. Laxminarayana, learned counsel representing Mr. K. Venkatesh Gupta, learned counsel for the revision petitioner prays for leave to with lraw the present civil revision petition.
3. Permi, ssion is accorded.
4. Accorrlingly, the present civil revision pt tition 1S dismissed a s withdrawn. As zr sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in Lhis civil revision petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/. P. CH. NAC|ABHUSHAMBA NT REGISTRAR ,lis.: )TION OFFICER To,
The Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar.
One CC to lvlr K. Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate IOPUC]
Two CD Copir:s kam/gh I HIGH COURT DATED:19 t0212025 EH1 4I .i. 1 APR 2025 )( \1 \ 2 \ * o \,ai). (-,,. \,, \. ORDER CRP.No.7367 of 2018 THE CRP IS DISMISSED AS WTHDRAWN a L
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.