✦ High Court of India · 18 Jul 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 18 Jul 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
18 Jul 2025
Length
1,065 words

5. Gurka Parvathalu, S/o. Sayanna, aged about 57 years, O ;c: Nil, R/o. 1-1 15, Chellampally Village, Thalakondapally Mandal, Mahabuk,r agar District. 6. Smt. Gurka Narsamma, Wo. G. Parvathalu, aged about { 3 years, Occ: Houhehold, R/o. 1-1 15, Chellampally Village, Thalakonda lally Mandal, Mahabubnagar Diskict. ...RESPONDI NTS/PETITIONERS lA NO: 2 OF 2017 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the oi cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cou 1 may be pleased to stay the execution of the judgment and decree of the court of the chairman,Motor Vehicle Accident claims Tribunal-cur-Vlll Addl.District Judge,RR District at LB Nagar dL.24.04.2017,made in MVO: No. 12b of 2014. Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. B. MAYUR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : SRl. SWAROOP OORILLA The Court made the following: JUDGMENT HON'BI,E SRI .TUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY MACMA No.3393 of 2OL7 JUIX}EMENT: l,earned counsel appearing for the appellant reported that the matter has been referred to the l,ok Adalat constituted by the High Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad, for settlement. After due deliberations, the Lok Adalat passed an award on

14.06.2025 as per the terms agreed upon by the parties. The original award dated 14.06.2025 is filed before this Court and the same is taken on record. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the award dated 14.06.2O25by the LokAdalat. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR l:t' //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal-Cum-Vlll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

2. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court Buildings at Hyderbad.

3. One CC to SRl. B MAYUR REDDYAdvocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRl. SWAROOP OOR|LLAAdvocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies GE/PSL Enclosing along with a copy of Lok Adalat Award HIGH COURT DATED:18/0712025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.3393 of 2017 tat " c \- \ r. ).(' 23 , '1., fr[t -./ isi,.) \,_)r. \\,'ii DISPOSING OF THE MACMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD q ,.| BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMIAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] Date:14-06-2025 Present:1. Hon'ble Sri Justice Laxmi Narayana Alishetty, (Judge, Hon'bte High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

2. Smt. E.Kavita Yadav, Advocate, lvlember M.A.C.M.A.NO.3393 of 2O17 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) treffi Ig, = * AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.125t2O14 (On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Vehicte Accident Ctaims Tribunat-cum-Vlll Add[. District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar) Between:-

1. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, (Prior to bifurcation known as Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation), Representing by its Managing Director Bus Bhavan, RTC X roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad. AND

1. Gurka Lakhmi Devi, W/o. Late G. Mattesh, Aged 26 years, Occ: Household, R/o. 1-1 15, Chettampatty Viltage, Thatakondapatty tt{andal, Mahabubnagar District.

2. Gurka Saraswathi, D/o. Late G. Maltesh, Aged 12 years, minor, rep. by her natural mother and guardian i.e. 1$ Respondent herein, R/o. 1-1 15, Chellampally Village, Thalakondapa[[y Mandat, Mahabubnagar District.

3. Gurka Pawani, D/o. Late G. Mattesh, Aged 7 years, minor, rep. by hir natural mother and guardian i.e. ln Respondent herein, R/o. 1-115, Chettampatty Vitlage, Thatakondapatty Mandal, l{ahabubnagar District.

4. Gurka Manisha, D/o. Late G. Mallesh, Aged 5 years, minor, rep. by her natura( mother and guardian i.e. 1" Respondent herein, R/o. 1-115, Chetlampatty Vittage, Thalakondapatty Mandat, l/rahahrbnagar District.

5. Gurka Parvathalu, S/o. Sayanna, Aged 57 years, Occ: Nil, R/o. 1-115, Cheltampatty Vittage, Thatakondapalty lr{andat, Mahabubnagar District. .... AppellanU Respondent. Respondents/Petitioners. AWARD

1. This is an appea[ fiLed by the Appettant(s) - Andhra I Transport Corporation, chaltenging the order dated 2z M.V.O.P.No.125 of 7014 by the Chairman, Motor Vehi Tribunat-cum-Vlll Addt. District Judge, Ranga Reddy District zt 2. Sri P.N.M. Chary, Law Officer - The Authorized Appettant(s)/TGSRTC has appeared and represented tt decided not to pursue the present appeal and t withdrawing the appeal.

3. The said representation is recorded and the apprl withdrawn, confirming the Judgment and Decree of betow. The amount,. if any, remaining unpaid to the deposited by the Corporation/TSRTC(s) within (2) mont receipt of copy of the award, atong with interest.

4. On such deposit, the Respondent/Claimant(s) is/are per his/her/their respective amount/s as per the awa Tribuna[/MACT.

5. .ln case, the parties subsequently come to know at appeal/cross objection, they are given liberty to: Order/Award.

6. Court fee paid on this appeal shatt be refunded. 7. No costs. radesh State Road 04-2017 passed in :[e Accident Ctaims L.B. Nagar. , . ",, representative of r: It the Corporation. rerefore. lheY ard 't is dismissed'a!.',r. the Court/Tribunal taimant(s) shatt be rs from the date of nitted to withdraw d passed by the rut fiting of cross :ek recat[ of this txw o II TGSRTC Bus Bhavan, HYd" Appe t lant(s)/Respondent(s)/ na State Road Tran rt Cor oratic 1 Telan 7 CHAIRMAN tJ €:)o o s t of the tee)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments