The High Court · 2025

1. M.Srinivas, Sio Yadaiah, Occ: Business Rl/o House No.21, Ameergudem Village, Moinabad Mandal, R.R.Dist,T.S. RESPONDENT/REVISION PETITIONEFYACCUSED

2. The State of Telangana Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. RESPONDENI/RESPONDENT NO.1 Praver in lA No.1 of 2025: Petition filed under Section 359 (6) of BNSS r/w Sec.52B of BNSS., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Respondent No.2 to compound the case with the accused who is the Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.2885 of 2017, on the file of this Court which was filed challenging the Judgment in Crl.A.No. 4O1 ot 20'15, on the file of the lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the Accused/ Revision Petitioner. Prayer lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section Section 359 (2) of BNSS r/w Sec.528 of BNSS., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise in the above CRL.RC.No.2885 of 2017 by compounding the offense in the terms of compromise. lA No.1 & 2 of 2025 Counsel forthe Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent.No.'l : SRI B.VINODHAR Counsel for the Respondent.No.2 : ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) : SAHITHI SRI KAVYA MUKKERA tN CRL.RC.NO.2885 0F 2017: Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent.No.l : ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) Counsel forthe Respondent.No.2 : MUKKERA SAHITHI SRI KAVYA :SRl B.VINODHAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE : lA Nos 1 & 2 lN 2887 OF 2o17: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment and sentence dated.19.07.2017, passed by the lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, in Crl.A.No.959 of 201S,confirming the trial court judgment and sentence dated.19.09.20'15, passed in C.C.No.175 of 2014(Old C.C.No.544 of 2014). on the file of Special Judicial Magistrate Court-l l, Rajend ranagar, Ranga Reddy district. Between: M.SRINIVAS, S/o Yadaiah, Occ: Business Rl/o House No.2'1, Ameergudem Village, Moinabad Mandal, R.R.Dist,T.S. ...REVISION PETITIONEWAPPELLANT/ACCUSED AND

1. The State of Telangana Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at HYderabad' ...... RE'P.NDENT

2. M.Sanjeeva S/o Mallaiah,Age:39 years Occ: Business , Rl/o Ameerguda, Peddamangalaram Village, Moinabad Mandal, R.R.Dist., T.S. ...RESPON DENT/RESPONDENT/COM PLAINANT IANO:1&2OF2025: Between: M.Sanjeeva S/o Mallaiah,Age:39 years Occ: Business , Rl/o Ameerguda, Peddamansararam Virrage' *l?i,?mgH.1ii,*ft ?8rrl-P^cro coMpLArNANr AND 1 M.Srinivas, S/o Yadaiah, Occ: Business Rl/o House No.21, Ameergudem Village, Moinabad Mandal, R.R.Dist,T.S.

2. The State of Telangana Represented by its Public Prosecutor, RESPONDENT/REVISION PETITIONEFUACCUSED High Court at Hyderabad. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.,I Praver in lA No.1 of 2025: Petition filed under Section 359 (6) of BNSS r/w Sec.52B of BNSS., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Respondent No.2 to compound the case with the RespondenURevision Petitioner in Crl.RC.No.2887 ot 2017, on the file of this Court which was filed challenging the Judgment in Crl.A.No. 959 of 2015, on the file of the lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge Ranga Reddy in which confirmed the Judgment in C.C.No.175 of 2014(Old C.C.No. 544 of 2O1) on the file of the Court of the Special Judicial Magistrate Court-|, Rajendranagar,R.R.District and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the Respondent / Revision Petitioner. Prayer lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section Section 359 (2) of BNSS r/w Sec.528 of BNSS., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise in the above CRL.RC.No.2887 of 2017 by compounding the offense in the terms of compromise. lA No.'t & 2 of 2025: Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent.No.l : SRI B.VINODHAR Counsel for the Respondent.No.2 : ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) : SAHITHI SRI KAVYA MUKKERA tN CRL.RC.N().2887 0F 2017: Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent.No.l : ASST. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) Counsel for the Respondent.No.2 : MUKKERA SAHITHI SRI KAVYA :SRl B.VINODHAR The Couft macle the following: COMMON ORDER HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI l.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/a nd CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.2B85 and 2887 of 2017 COMMON ORDER: Since the petitioner-appellant-accused in both the criminal revision cases is one and the same, they are heard together and being disposed of by way of this common order.

2. Challenging the judgments dated 19.07.2017 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos.401 and 959 ot 2015 by the learned lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar, these Criminal Revision Cases are filed. By the impugned orders, the judgment dated 07.05.2015 passed in C.C.No.132 of 2014 by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate Court-ll, Rajendranagar and the judgment dated 19.09.2015 passed in C.C.No.175 of 2014 by the learned l-Special Judicial Magistrate, Rajendranagar, were confirmed, wherein, the petitioner-appellanlaccused was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of N.l. Act and he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and six months respectively. He was also directed to pay the cheque amount of Rs.6,00,000/- within two months from the date of order in C.C.No.132 of 2014, in 2 default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and to pay Rs.2,50,000/- towards compensation within one month from the date of order in C.C.No.175 ot2O14.

3. lt is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Revision Cases, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, !.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

4. Vicie orderdated 17.06.2025, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Cornmittee tligh Coud foi- the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a repo(.

5. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 25.A6.2025 and the same is placed on record.

6. ln view of the above, I.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2025 in both the criminal revision cases are allowed. Consequently, these Criminal 3 Revision Cases are allowed and the conviction and sentence of imprisonment imposed against the petitioner-appellant-accused in the judgments dated 19.07.2017 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos.401 and 959 of 201 5 by the learned I ll Additionat Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B Nagar, confirming the judgment dated 07.05.2015 passed in C.C.No.132 of 2014 by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate-ll, Rajendranagar and the judgment dated 19.09.2015 passed in C.C.No.175 of 2014 by the learned l-Special Judicial Magistrate, Rajendranagar are hereby set aside. The bail bonds of the petitioner-appellant-accused, if any, shall stand cancelled. lVliscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPYII Sd/- N. SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Special Magistrate Court-|, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. 2. The Special Magistrate Court-ll, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The lll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy district I L.B.Nagar.

4. Two CCs to Assistant PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG), High Court for the State of Telanagana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. One CC to SRl. K. YADAGIRI, Advocate [OPUCI 6. One CC to SAHITHI SRI KAVYA MUKKERA, Advocate TOPUC] 7. Two CD Copies TUkam w HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/r1025 I COMMON ORDER l.A. NOs 1 and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRLRC.Nos.2885 and 2887 of2O17 e t riE :t r,1 -) Y () I 0 4 l\l0y 20fr o c;rTC r i !--O_ ALLOWING CRIMlhlAL R.Cs lN TERMS OF COMPROMISE @w IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OT TTTAUCANA AT HYDERABAD I.A.No. . of 2075 CRL.R.C. No. N 28f5 of 20L7 Between: B. Narayan Reddy, S/o. KaShi Reddy, : Aged 44 years, Occ: Business & Agriculure, R /o. Peddamangalaram village, Moinabad Mandal, R.R District, TS. ' ...Petitioner/Respondent No. 2/ ' de-facto Complainant And

1.M. Srinivas, S/o. Yadaiah, 1,^.1"i ' t i Aged 27 years, Occ: Business, PJo. House No.21, Ameergudem village, Moinabad Mandal, R.R Distric[ TS. , I

2.TheStateofTerangana. . -. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, Hish court for the s.tbtd;..9f rJelangana, nro"::.R."1;""denr/ . '<1) "'Responden(Revision Peiiitioner/Accused Respondenr No.1 JOINT MEMO , that the Petitioner/Respondent No.2 and 1. It is submitted the intervention of elders and well wishers Respondent/Accused at compromised'ine maftet amicably. As per the advice of elders and well wishers, Petitioner has comprornised the matter out of court.

2. Therefore, the Petitioner/complainant has no objection to close the case against the Accused in C.C. No. 132 of 2Ot4 on the file of special ludicial Magistrate Court - II, RajendraNagar, RR District.

3. Hence it is just and necessary to record the,compromise and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the Petitioner in CrlA. No. 401 of 2015 on the file of III Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge RangaReddy District At L.B Nagar, which is preferrdd against C.C. No. L32 of 2014 Special > :t ludicial Magistratr: Court-II, RajendraNagar, R.R District. i I lt is therefore prayed that this Honble Court nray be pleaseQ to recgrd the compromise in the above Crl.R.C. No. 2885 of 2017 by compounding the offence in terms <rt the compromise and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circurnstances.of the case. R- +{'{-\ nespon'Gnt G.ileh-Bainant B pd.Y?q Relh ) \}J,/ Counsel for the Respondent No.2/Com plainant Petitioner /Accused (t t. S"tniruS; g \Y'wf+\,"- Counsel for the Petitioner/Accused Hyderabad Date: ll -06-2025