SRl. M v. RAMA RAO Counsel forthe

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed theiewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and to call for records related to order of Hon'bleAndhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad daled- 20.O8.2014 in O'A. N0.4948/2014 and quash or set aside the same l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016 (WPMP. NO:32 1s8 0F 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order, dated: 20.08.20'14 passed in O.A.494812O14 on the file of the Hon'ble AP Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad pen4ine. disposal of the Writ Petition and pass l.A. NO: 1OF 2017 MP. NO: 2031 OF 20171 Between: 1 A. Satish Gourj, S/o Yellaiah Goud, Aged about 27 years, V.rorked as H.G. 6960, Home Ciuards Organization, Hyderabad-City, Attac red to Traffic Punjagutta P.S Hyderabad. R/o. 10-4-33, Fathe Nagar, Hyderirbad. AND .....PETITIONER/RESF ONDENT No.1 1 2 4 The State of 1'elangana rep by its Principal Secretary, Hon e Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad. - 22. The Additional Director of Police, Home Guards, D.G.P. O fice, Saifabad, Hyderabad-4. The commissiorer of Police, Hyderabad City, Hyderabad, - The Commandant, O/o. The Commandant Home Guards, H yderabad City, Purana Havali, C;hatta Bazar, Hyderabad. - 2. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS A.P. Administrative Tribunal Rep. by Registrar, Purani Haveli, l- yderabad ...RESPONDENT/RESPI)NDENT NO.2 (R-5 is not necessary party to this petition) Petition under rlection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstz nces stated in the affidavit filed in r;upport of the petition, the High Court may te pleased to Vacate The order p:rssed in W.P.M.P.No.3215812016 in W.p.Nr . 2600712016 dated.04-08-2016 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. V. RAMA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI V. VENKATA KUMAR Counsel for the Restrrondent No.2:-- The Court made the f ollowing: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Writ Petition No.26OO7 OF 2016 ORDER: fer the Hon'ble Sn Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauili) t I When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners had informed the Court that the issue raised in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order, dated 07.11.2022, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.13564 of 2Ol3 and by following the aforesaid order, the present Writ Petition is also liable to be dismissed.

2. In view of the said submissions, this Court is of the considered view that the present Writ Petition is also iiable to be dismissed following the aforesaid order, dated 07 .l | .2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No. 13564 of 2O 13.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed following the aforesaid order, dated 07 .11.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.13564 of 2013. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 As a seqrtel, miscellaneous applications pendin 3, if any, shall stand clos t:d I \.., //rRUE coPY// SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I h. if\ ..,1 5Ec rtoru oFFlcER To, 1 One CC to SFl. lV. V. RAMA RAO, Advocate toP-qql .. il; cc i6 sn . v. vEttKATA KUMAR, Advocate [oPUC] 3 Two CD CoPies (Along with the CoPY of Court O rder dt:O711112022 in W P.No. 13564 of 2013) BM GJP .1 't HIGH COURT DATED:051021?.025 ORDER WP.No.26007 of 2016 ( /q f, 1 At ST4rc 2 4 \PB 2025 z c i Di s ,ATc ,r DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS / 4,./ /5/4q/ , HolfBLE SRI IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO w'P'No' 11561 OI z)tt ORDEk (Pcrlfon'D{c StiJalde A$nad &at Stual) AggrEved by tte order d^Ed 27'@2012 Pass€d LI OAJrkm4 of 2glz by thc Aldbra Prad€sh Adminisradve Tribunal, Hderaba{ tlc prcsem vrit pcirioo has becn fikd' Heand hamed C'orrcmrrent Pba&r for Services'I appearng for the pedti'onen and Sri MVSSai Krishna' Larrrcd coumcl appearing for the respofu' lpPoinrcd l.earrd Govemnrnc Phader'for Scrvices-I aPPearing for the petidoners had contended tlnt the respoodcnrs s,erc as HonE Gtrards and *rey v'tre :a,:rrl,rrrrrd ddc order darcd 25-08'2011' Aggrbved by the sanr' the resRon&1s bave approacbed dle Tribuoat by fil'ng O.AI.{o.724 of 2Ol2 and widrout appreciadng any of tbc conrenciorsaisedbythepetitiooen,theTrbunalhes allo!,gd tk said O'A ddc onder dated 27fi2012' Therefort, aPProPna rc orders be Passed h *re wr* Peut$n byseaing aside the order passed bythe Trihrnl- \ ,-r&.ieEe:t 7 i{a ving corsidered the said submissions, rhis ,}un is of tle vew ttw the Tnbunal by following ics earli, r order passec i r OAI\o.2104 of 2012, dered %.O 20l 2 ;ranted rel.ief in favour of the respondena *i-rt order pu, sed by - " the Tnbrnal was confirrrrd byrhis Coun in V.p.Nc.2gg75 o{ 2C1O darcd [email protected]. Therefore, rhe TribLurrt $as jusufi rd ur allowing rhe OA in favour of the respr,rdeats. Fkncr, r hjs Coun is not inclined to intcrfere with ttre order passec byrhe Tribunal- I'r: :ondingly, the W. rir petitbn is dismissed- No c,:srs. IrG ccllaneous pecitiors, if any, pending sirall sand closed