✦ High Court of India · 24 Jan 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 24 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
24 Jan 2025
Length
1,075 words

Counsel for the Appellant in MACMA and Respondent No 2 in cross objection SR : sRr. HARTNATH REDD' soMA Counsel.for the Respondent No. 1 and MACMA Lross objector in Cross Objection : SRI C.M. PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 in MACMA Ano Hespondent No. 1 in Cross Objection : NONE APPEARED The Court delivered the following Judgment: THE HON'BLE SMT. JI,,STICE M'G'PRIYADARSINI M.A.C .M.A. No.3124 of.20 18& x- c1()nNo.26 of 20L9 MENT JUDG I. Pursuant to the request made by the Counsel appea-r1ng 'both the parties, the matter was referred to Lok Adalat' On 14.12-2024, trre matter was settled before the Lok Adalat and an Award was passed by the Lok Adalat' In view of the above' this Motor Accident Civil 2. Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of in terms of the Award passed by the Lok Adalat' There shall be no order as to costs'

3. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications' if any' pending shall stand clgs-e-d', Sd/- MOHD. ISMAIL ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ASS CTION OFFICER \ LlrfJt-..tEtiil^{;d1,r-,:imtlfl}ttil""'''trAdd"na' Iy,:r"n'*q,,"nol"lopv ot Lok Adalat Award) To

2. 3. kul/gh i HIGH COURT DATED:24t01t2025 I i I l iie S r4, 4' 3ca J ,) t s.r ? C, 2 ,r lllrir 2025 * r:9 ) -:;- JUDGMENT MACMA. No.312 4 ot 2018&cROSS OBJECTI NO. 26 0F 2019 ON I)ISPOSING OF IIll. \trr,.]\4A IN T.ERMS OI._.I_HE .,\\u,,\t{D \\.I filoLi I (.( )s I s .l. I I i ,i i i r R $[fsi"s -trn * o() I State o\1 BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMAAITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD., lunder Section I ? .of the Legol Services Authorities Act, 1 987 (Centrol Acl)l Date:l4-12-2024 Present:1. Hon'ble Mrs. Justice S.Nanda, (Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman'

2. Sri K. Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate, Member -

3. Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, Advocate, Member lrlAClvlA.No.3124 of 2018 & X-OBJECTION No.26 of 2019 (Before the Hon'bte High Court) AGAINST M.V.O.P.No. 2364 of 2O14 (On the fite of the Motor Accidents Tribunal Cum lll Additionat fhief Judge: City Civit Court, Hyderabad) lvlACIvlA. No.3 1 24 of 20 1 8 Between:- Bharti Axa General lnsurance Company Ltd', Represented by its Claims Manager, 3'd Floor, 6-3-66618/6, Gokul Towers, Panjagutta, Hyderabad, Tetangana-500082. AND

1. Mohammed lnayathul[ah, Aged 48 years, Occ: Mechanic, R/o: H.No.4-4-1 3, AttaPur, Hyderabad-500 048.

2. D.Vijaya Mohan, S/o. D.Bhaskar Rao, Aged: Major, Occ: Business, R/o: H.No. 14-1 0-1 066, DhaotPet, Hyderabad-500006. ...Appettant/2"d Respondent ...Respondent/ Petitioner . . . Respondent/ 1'tResPondent X - OBJECITON No.26 of 2019 Mohammed Inayathultah, 5/o.Md.lsmaiI Sahab, Aged about: 48 years, Occ: Bike Mechanic, R/o.H. No.4-4- 13, Attapur, Hyderabad. AND ... Petitioner/ Respondent/Claimant 1 2 D.Vijaya Mohan S/o D.Bhaskar Rao, Aged: Major' Occ: Business,R/o: H.No.14-10-1066, Dhoo[pet, Hyderabad. ..ResPondent/ ResPondent M/s. Bharti Axa Generat lnsurance Company Limited, Represented by its Ctaims Manager, 3'd Floor, 6-3-6661816, Gbku[ Towers, Panjagutta, Hyderabad, Telangana. Respondent/Appettant counsel for claiman ts / Petitioners/Appettants: M/s.c.Mohan prakaslr, K.L.Manohar & P.Ramesh, Advocates t: counse[ for Appettant / lespondent/ lnsurance Company :sri Harinath Reddy soma, Advocate . Representative of lhsurance Company : Sri Mohimmed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager - Lega L Ctaims This appea( and X-objections having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and also the parties, the fottowing award is pass:d: AWARD

1. The /r4AC/r4A Nc.3124 of 2018.has been filed by the lnsurance: Conrpany whereas the x-objection No.26 of 2019 has been fited by the ctaimant/ retitioner/ Respondent. During the pendency of the appeal and X-Objection, both the parties along with their counse[ r.€'presented that they decided to withdraw their respective appeal and X-Objection by confirming the order passed by the Tribunat/LDwer Court.

2. The said reore:i€'ntation is recorded by confirming the order:; of t1e court/Tribunat betow. The anlunt if any remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s) shatt be deposited by the lnsurance company within one month from the date of rec<lipt of the award, atong with inte-est.

3. On such depos,t, the Respon dent/Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the entire amount.

4. In view of the iit,ove representation made by ctaimant and rnsurar,ce company, the appeal and x-obiection i.e., lvlACl,,{A No.3124 of 201g and X-objectron No.26 of 2019 stand disposed ()i as withdrawn.

5. Court fee paid ()n this appeal shatt be refunded. 6. No costs. SERY C() 1 * If,ifffs o.lt ::.\z ri1 I I I i BA -l E * VvJ" >}6tt t, \ "{,.}o s\r\14 Appe ltant (s) Respcndent (s) !iA G Ei,IE cosi eotE IN Si-IRAN'E ) t j !t1 Counsel for the APPellant (s) Counse[ for the ResPondent 1/.1 9\ rr$' ,ra-il)^ CHAIRI'^AN ER \,n.- MEMBEH, I g F.L SER o SE 5 t l- * LOK ABALAT ,t{Iii} Sieii ol1 t. -: I I 1 1 uou.' tot'F"tttul !:fot'

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments