✦ High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Sep 2025
Length
1,160 words

Sri Surya Nagar, Hayathnagar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict

2. M/ s. Bajaj Allianz General lnsurance Co Ltd, Rep. by its Deputy Manager (Legal), 3-6-111/8, ll floor, Far East Plaza, Street No.1B, Main Road, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad ...Respondents/Respondents Gounsel for the Appellants: SRI KRISHNA KISHORE KOWURI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A.RAMA KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT i I I I L THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO IANDIKONDA M.A.C.M.A.No.2837 of 2OL7 JUDGMENT: Fh:rsuar-r, iu the request made by the Iarned counsel appearing lor both the parties, the matter'"r'eu; referred to Lok Adalat. On 13.09.2O25, the matter was settle, before the Lok Atlalat arrd att a''r'ard was passed by the Lok i\: llat. In vierv of the above, the M.A.C.M.A. is; disposed of in terms of the ar,r'ard, dateci 13.09.2025, pas;:d by the Lok Adalat. There shall be no order as to costs. As a seqtrel, the miscellaleous petiticns 1 ending, if ;Lny, shall stand clo sed //TRUE COPY// SD/ A . T4. JAWAHAR REDDY ; ;ISTANT REGISTRAR .a(>' SECTION OFFICER To Secunderabad.

1. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-XXVll Chief Jrr ge, City Civil Court at 2 One CC to SRI KRISHNA KISHORE KOWURT Advocate 3pUCl 3. One CC to SRI A.RAtvlA KRISHNA REDDY, Advocate tOF JCI 4. Two CD Copies d AS/NVB (Enclosing award copy passed by Lok Adalat) HIGH COURT DATED:2610912025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.2837 of 2017 t', ,,G iio,:J '. -t- t lHE S 0 { rr:E 2m 4.1'. * MACMA DISPOSED OF IN TERMS OF AIUARD SED BY LOK ADALAT A > , BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMA4ITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD. [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] Date: 13-09-2025 (: Present:1. Hon'ble Justice Sri G.V.Seethapathy, l I r-ouRi lonult ,.r t( .-) iar ;o K i eSt (Former Judge oF erstwhile Andhra pradesh High Court) Chairman 2. Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate, Member M.A.C.M.A.NO.28 37 of 2017 (Before the Hon'ble High Couit) AGAINST (On the fite of the XXV M.V.O.P.No.29 0 of 2015 ll Addt. Chief J udge-cum-Chairman, Motor Vehicte Accidents Ctaims Tribunat, City Civit Court, at Secunderabad) Between: - 1. B.Jagadish, S/o. Late Laxmarah, Age: 47 years,Occ: Business, 2. Master B. Arnva, 5/o. Jagadish, Age: 5 years, Occ: Nit. (Appettant No. 2 being minor, Rep. through his natural father and next best friend the I't petitioner herein) Both R/o. H.No. 5-8-21l26, Aga Apartment, Ftat No. 106, B-Btock, Fatehsulthan Lane, Beside Surya Hospitat, Nampatty, Hyderabad. Presentty R/o.H.No. 3-211/C/21 , Market Street, Rejimentat Bazar, Secunderabad.

1. G. Shekar, S/o. G. Mattaiah, Age: Major, Occ: Business, R/o. Ptot No. 132, Sri Surya Nagar, Hayathnagar, Hayathnagar Mandat, Ranga Reddy District. AND

7. Mls. Bajaj Attianz GeneraI lnsurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Deputy Manager (Legat), 3-6-111/8. Il ftoor, Far East ptaza, Street No.1g, Main Road, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. ...Appellants/Petitioners ...Respondents/Respondents CounseI for Appettants /C taimants Counsel for lnsurance Company/ Respondent No.2 Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Tirupati Venkata Lakshi Narasimha Reddy Chaganti, Advocate : Sri A.Rama Krishna Reddy, Advocate Ms. Mitravinda Devarasetty, LegaI Executive of lnsurance Company This dppeaI havrnq Deen referred for setttement before th;s Lok Adatat and after , t hearing the Learned counser for the parties and arsJ the partier the fortowing aulard is passed; Compensatron Awarded by the Tribunat Compensa tion Awarded (Setllement Reached ) in the Lok Adata t. Eq o l,_,: \.'' I i r, /) aI i l-,:lii .{d}.r.La;a 1t,/ -1, a:li-{r- AWARD j Rs.10,00,000i - with interest @ 7.52 r )T annum from the dat,r of petitjon titt reaUzation, against re;y,, ndents 1 & 2 jointty and severa Ity. This appeat has been preferred by t I , Appettan t/ Petitioner llos. 1 & Z against the orders passed in /1/OP.No.290 of 2015 by the XXVII Addt. Chief Judge,cum-Chair-m r r, Motor VehicLe Accicent Ctaims Tribuna(, City Civit ( ( urt, at Secunderabacl. Ms. Mitravinda Devarasetty, the Le: rl Executive of lnsurance Compa ny/ Respondent No.2 and the Ap ) ,ttan t / petitioner Nos. 1 I 2 atong with their CounseI Sri A.Rama l,ir i hna Reddy, Advocate, have appeared before the Lok Adatat. Drr ing the pendency of this appeal, the Appettant/ Petitioners as ve[( as Respondent tlo.2/ {nsurance Company have entered into s. tlement. In terms of the said setttement, Appe[ . rts-lnsurance Company has agreed to pay an amount of Rs.4,00,0Ct/- fut[ and finaI settlem,rnt from the date of petition titt the <J;Lr : of reatization, withir a period of one (1) month from the date rf receipt of a copy of this award. ln defautt of depositing the sail amount, the ctaimants are ] entitted for interest @7.5% per annum es awarded by the Tribunal. I Apportionment of Compensatron, if any The apportionment between the Appet lnt/Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 shatl be made in terms of the Award pa:;: :d in MVOP. No.290 of 201 5 by the Tribunat. Additional Direction(s):

1. The Appettant is entitted to the refund of Court Fee parc n this appeal. 2. The amount atready deposited by the lnsurance Company if any, shatt be given credit to.

3. Soon after deposit by the lnsurance Company, the major t't is entitled to withdraw her entire share amount. Tl-( Petitioner/Ctaimant No.2 shatt be kept in fixed deposit ir titt they attain majority, as per the orders and apportionrr Tribunat. ln token of consent for the above setttement and awar l. the parties and titioner/Ctaimant No. 1 shares of the minor any Nationalized Bank -.nt determined by the their counsel have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the part ( s, this case stands disposed of \b '\ fr\.Acvrfl ",,"+t+!W, Appellant (s) Respondent (s) Ir'i N ( .cr E aj.:.; AltL.lnz GeneraI lrtsu nte Ct, i ,,; r\ulh o ed Si na v Lru* V1 v ) s /r4 Counsel for Appellant (s) Counsel for Respondent (s) Chairman ( { * $,rte ol'i )e *

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments