The High Court · 2025

1. The State of Telangana , Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, 2. The Superintendent of Police, Warangal Rural, Distrtct Warangal - 506 002. 3. The Asst. Superintendent of Police, Mulugu, Warangal District. 4. The Station House Officer, P.S., Mulugu, District Warangal - 506 343. 5. The Tahsildar, [/ulugu Mandal, Warangal District., - 6. Sri Porika Balram Naik, S/o Not known to the Petitioners and Aged about 56 Years, R/o Madanapelli Village, lvlulugu Mandal, Warangal District.

7. Sri Ajmeera Chandulal, S/o Not known to the Petitioners, Aged about 76 Years, Occ MLAand l\,4inister for Tribal Welfare and Tourism, R/o. Mulugu (V and M), Warangal District.

8. Sri Ajmeera Piahallad, S/o Chandulal, Aged 37 Years, Occ Doctor, R/o Sarangapalle H/o Jaggannapet Village, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District 9. Sri Dharam Singh, S/o Chandulal, Aged 35 Years, Occ Advocate, R/o Sarangapalle H/o Jaggannapet Village, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District 10.Sri Vancha Ram Mohan Reddy, S/o Adi Reddy, Aged 48 Years, Occ Agrl., R/o Kodiselakunta Village, h/ulugu Mandal, Warangal District.

11. Smt. Vancha Anitha, W/o Ram Mohan Reddy, Aged 40 Years, Occ Agrl., Rl/o Kodishalakunta Village, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District. '12. Sri Vemulapalli Bixapathi, S/o Rajaiah, Aged 34 Years, Occ Agrl., Rl/o 13. Sri Rajamahender Nayak, S/o Laxman, Aged 37 Years, Occ. Dy.S.P., Kummaripelli H/o Abbapur Village, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District. Mulugu' warangal District ...RES'.NDENT' Petition under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lnc i praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited therewith, the 11gh Court may be pleased to lssLre an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, nr,r e pa rticularly one in the nature of Wrii of lr,4andamus, declaring the inaction of th: Respondents i to 4 tn not providing Pori:e protectron to the petitioners as iIe ! r, v.id, viorative of principles of naturar lustice and arso in vioration of Articres 1 I 1lt. 21and 300-A of the constitution of rndra and consequenry to direct the Fr( spordents .1 to 4 to provide porice protectron to the lite, riberty and rands of ,re I etitioners in survey Nos.38/2, 3912, 1112. 4zts. 112, 4412, 35411, 4orz, 4312 t sr2 4il2 and 48/2 situated at I\.4allampally Village, l\,4ulugu l\,4andat, Waranga District pursuant to the Ad-lnterim tnjunctron order dated 15tiot2o15 passed r tA No.z29l2015 in os No'529/2015 0n the rire of the Hon'bre, Addr. Senior ci,,i Judge at warangar against the Respondents 6 to 13 l.A. NO: 10F 2016(WPMP. N O:31749 oF 2016) Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the r;i cumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High Cou,t may be pleased to direct the Official Respondents 1 to 4 to provide necessar), ,olice protection to the life, liberty and lards of the petitioners in Survey 3812,..\ 2, 4112,4219, 1/2, 4412, 354t1, 4Ol2 43t2. 46t2, 4 2 and 4Bl2 situated at tr a arnpa y Vi age, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal District pursuant to the ArJ-inte.i n lnjunctron Order dared 1511012015 passed in IA No.72912015 in os No.529/2 1 5 0n the frre of the Hon'bre Addr' senior civir Judge at warangar agarnst the f r :spondents 6 to 13 pending disposal of the Writ petition. ' l NO:1 oF 2022 (-1 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in.the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the petition and consequently implead the Petitioners as Respondent No. 14 to 19 in the W.P No. 25686 of 2016 and as we as the W.p. M.p. No, 31249 of 2016, in the interest of justice and equity. Lest, the Imptead Petition ers/Proposed Respondent No. 14 to 19 would be put to irreparable loss and inju ry Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. GOVERDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: SRI R. LAXIKANTH REDDy, AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Proposed Respondents: Ms. SyED LATEEF Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6to13:-- The Court made the following: ORDER *-;r*7 a THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.f'I KARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.25686 OF 2( 16 ORDER: This !flrit Petition is filed under Articie 22( tl (bnstitution of Iridia seelcrng the following relief/s:- "... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, nx,r : particu[arl1, one in the nature of Writ o[ r\,hndamus, declaring the i, rciion of the Respondenrs 1 to 4 in not providing Police prot,, tion to rhe Pedtionen as iJlegal, void, violative of principtes of narr,r rl ju-stice and also in violation oi Anicles 1'1, 19, 21 .rnd lbO-A of th.l C.onstitution o[ India and consequenrly ro direct rhe fusponder,r ; 1 ro 4 to provide Poke Protection to rhe life, libe.** and I :rds of the Petitionen in SurveyP4c6.3g/ 2, is/ 2. 4l/ 2, 4i/9, I/ -,, +4/2, 354/ l, 40/2, 43/2, 46/2, 47/2 anC, 48/Z siruated at Mrllar: rally Village, Md"Sl l\4andal, Warangal Disrict ptLrsuant to rl:t Ad- Interim Injunction Order dared 15/rc/2015 passed m lA Nr Z2912015 in OS No.529,/2015 on rhe filc of rhe Honble iI Add . Senior Cvil Judge at Warangal against the Respondens 6 ro 1J, anC ,ass..... . 2 None appeared on behalf of thc petitionen.

3. I have heard Mr.Rla-xmikanth Reddy, l,:.mecl fusistant Govemment Pleader for Home appearing for rr spondenr Nos. Ito4.

4. kamed fusistant Government pleader for. Home submits that the pedrioners' prayer is essentially for 1 rant of police 2 o protection, ,lLgi"g inaction on the parr of respondent Nos. 1 to 4/pohce authorities. It is contended that, if the petitioners were genuinely aggrieved by the failure of the police in extending such protection, they ought to have invoked the remedies expressly availaHs under the C-ode of Criminal Procedure, lg73 (C"r.P.C)/Bhanti:7a Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, ZO23 (BNSS). Without exharsting those starutory remedies, invocation of writ jurisdiction under Ardcle 226 of the Constirution of India is not maincainable. 5 I have carefully perused the mater-ials placed on record.

6. The substance of the petirioners' case is that the police authorities failed to provide protecrion in punuance of the order datedt5.t0.2015 passed in I.A No. 729 of 2015 n O.S. No. 529 of 201,5.Inthis regard, it is pertrnent to note that a C-oordinate Bench of this Cotrrt, in Nfl.P. No. 8958 of ZOZS dated 13.06.2025, has fur dy considered a similar issue. ft was held therein that unless the petitioners demonstrate steps taken to enforce the decree/order 3 passed in a civil surt by irutiaring approu iare execurion proceedings, including a requesr therein for pcl ( e prorection ro facilitate the irnplementation of the decree, sucl-r r wnr petition is not rnaintainab le.

7. In view of this settied position of larv, t:r: prayrer of the petitioners, seelcing direct police prorecrion on rli: strength of an ad rnterim ordeq cannot be entertained. Nevr theless, having regard to the pleadings on record and also takrng ir :o consideration the fact that an interim order has been granted b1, : Lis (irurt, tiberry is reserved to the petitioners ro avail themselves (,t rhe appropriate remedies before the comperenr Executing Court. 8 Accordingly, the writ petition stan& dispos: I of. Therc shall be no order as to costs. Misceilaneous Petitions, pending if any, shal rtand closed. - Sc -8. REKHARANI tssir \rANr REGISTRAR ,/ //TRUE COPY// \ecrtou oFFrcER To, Hvrierabad.'Telanoana State.

1. The Princioal Secretary, Home Department. S ecretariat Buildings, 2 Tlie Suoerintendeit of police, Warangal Rural, D'strict / a'anqal - 506 002. 3. The Asit. Superintendent of Police, tuiulugu, Warangal t istrict. 4. The Station House Officer, P S , Mulugu, District Wararr al - 506 343. I I I \ I Ijilisji%*.t,",,b#4+*,'"m.wt}"7. n,,. ,. lj{tt a.;",":rr-(rR ,r^ t' ?+ REvENUE Hish courr ror rhe srate or rerangana, at ", HIGH COURT ) , DATED:1 510912025 ORDER WP.No.25686 of 2016 + J c Itr ( * e { ( 14l == \\, 0t t:t 2np .S,, - +t''-/ _.4- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS \q F <t \ It L1