Rayala Pushpavathi v. 1. The Slate of Telangana

Petiticn under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to ir;sue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF M,{NDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 2 to 8 on the petitioners representations dt. 18.11 .2013 and 28.08.20'16 submitted for granting Police Aid to protect her possession and enjoyment over landed property of Ac. 1.30 guntas in Survey Number 33414O and 334/51 of Kakarlapally Revenue Village in Sathupally Mandal of Khammam District pursuant to Decree and Judgrnent dt. 12.09.2003 passed in O.S. No. 38 of 2003 on the file of the Court of Learned Junior Civil Judge, Sathupally, as illegal, irregular, irrational and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 8 to protect the petitioners possession and enjoyment over the said land by preventing the respondents I to 20 from and in any manner interfering thr:rewith. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 38622 oF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 8 to give necessary police aid to protect the petitioner's possession and enjoyment over landed property of Ac. 1.30 guntas in Survey Number 334140 and 334/51 of Kakarlapally Revenue Village in Sathupally Mandal of Khammam District pursuant to Decree and Judgment dt. 12.09.2003 passed in O.li. No. 38 of 2003 on the tile of the Court of Learned Junior Civil Judge, Sathucally by preventing respondents 9 to 20 from and in any manner interfering therewith, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. l.A. NO:1 OF 2017(WVMP. NO :4627 OF 2O171 Between:

1. The District Collector, Khammam District at Kharnmam. 2. The Revenue Divisionat Officer, Khammam Division, Khammam District. 3. The Tahsildar, Sathupally Mandat, Khammam District. 4. The Revenue lnspector-ll, Sathupally Mandal, Khammam District. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. Rayala Pushpavathi, Wo. Late Venkateswara Rao, aged 59 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o. 1-153, SHR Street, Sathupally Vuillage and Mandal, Khammam District.

2. The State of Telangana, Rep. By its Principal Secretary to Govemment, Home Department, Telangana Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Khammam Distrtict at Khammam. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sathupally, Khammam District. 5. The Station House Officer, Sathupalty Police Station Khammam District. : 6. Narapogu Venkatesh, S/o. Gopaiah, Occ Cultivation, 7. Junjunuri Sidha Rao, S/o. Muthaiah. aged 58 years. 8. lfula Vasantha Rao, S/o. Gopaiah, aged 56 years. 9. Kolikapogu Seetharamulu, S/o. Uddandu, aged 54 years. l0.ltikala Nagesh, S/o. Gopalam, aged 58 years. ll.Junjunuri Pulla Rao, S/o. Suraiah, aged 52 years l2.Kolikapogu Vasantham, S/o. Venkatesh, aged 54 years. l3.Kolikapogu Gopi, S/o. Pullayya, aged 39 years.

14.Eedara Santhu, S/o. Gopaiah, aged 41 years. l5.Narapogu Kamalamma, Wo. Venkatesh, aged 43 years.

16.Syed Mahimunnisa, Wo. Vali, aged 55 years. l T.ltikala Gopi, S/o. Nageswara Rao, aged 40 years Respondents 6 lo 17 are resident of Kakarlapally Village and Post, Sathupally Mandal, Khammam District. (Respondents 2 to 17 are not necessary parties to this petition) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to. vacate the interim orders dated 20-9-2016 passed in wP MP No. 38622 of 2016 in WP No. 31213 ol 2016 and dismiss the writ petition. 2 Between:

1. Edara Chanti Babu @ Santhu, S/o. Gopaiah, aged 45 years, Occ: Agriculture Coolie

2. Junjunuri Sidha Rao, S/o. Muthaiah, aged 58 years, Occ: Coolie Both arer resident of lGkarlapally Village and Post' Sathupally Mandal, Khammarn District D 1 W/o. Late Venkateswara Rao, aged 1-153, SHR Street, Sathu pally V uillage PETITIONERS 59 years, Occ and Mandal, Khamrnam District. 2 The Sitate of Telangana, Rep. By its Principal Secrelary to Government, Home Department, Tblangana Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

3. The S,.rperintendent of Police, Khammam Distrtict at Khammam. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sathupalty, Khammam District. 5. The Station House ffic,er, Sathupally Police Station Khammam District. 6. District Collector, Khammam District at Khammam. 7. Revenue Divisional fficer, Khammam Division, Khammam District. 8. Tahsiklar, Sathupally Mandal, Khammam District. 9. Revenue lnspector-ll, Sathupally Mandal, Khammam District. lO.Narap()gu Venkatesh, S/o. Gopaiah, Occ Cultivation,

11. Kola Vasantha Rao, S/o. Gopaiah; aged 56 years. l2.Kolikapogu Seetharamulu, S/o. Uddandu, aged 54 years.

13. ltikala Nagesh, S/o. Gopalam, aged 58 years. l4.Junjunuri Pulla Rao, S/o. Suraiah, aged 52 years

15. Kolikapogu Vasantham, S/o. Venkatesh, aged 54 years. 1O. Kolikapogu Gopi, S/o. Pullayya, aged 39 years.

17. Narapogu Kamalamma, Wo. Venkatesh, aged 43 years. '18. Syed h4ahimunnisa, Wo. Vali, aged 55 years. 'tg.ltikala r3opi, S/o. Nageswara Rao, aged 40 years Resoondents 10 to 1g are resident of lGkarlapally Village and Post, Sathupally Manhal, Khammam District ...RESPONDENTS ] Petition undet section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in wP MP No. *622 of 2o16 in wP No' 31213 of 2o16, deted 20-9-2016 in the interest of Justice COUNSEI fOr thc PEtitiONETS: SRt AARE VENKATESWARA RAO Gounsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for,the Respondent No.S to 8: GP FOR REVENUE counsel for the Respondent No.10 & 17: SRI S.SURENDER REDDY The Gourt made the following: ORDER I I ! I i ! I i i I I I I t t t I ! i t I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I i I i I ! ! j : i I i I I II THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia seeking the' following relief: "... tet rssue a writ, order or direction, mole pafticulady, one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 2 to 8 on the petitionefs rcprcsentations dt. 18.11.2013 and i>-8.08.2016 submifted for granting PoliOe Aid to protect her posserssion and enjoyment over landed prcperty of Ac.1-30 guntas in Suruey Number 334/40 and 334/51 of Kakadapally Revenue Village in Sathupally Mandal of Khamrmm District, pursuant to Decree and Judgr,oent dt.12-09-2003 passed,n O.S. No. 38 of 2003 on the file of the Ciourt of leamed Junior Civil Judge, Sathupally, as illegal, irregular, inational and violative of A;,rticles 14 and 21 of Constitution of lnd,ia and consequently direct the respondents 2 to I to protect the petitionels possesvon and enjoyment over the said land by preventing the respondents 9 to 20 frcm and in any manner interte,ing therewith andpass such other orderc or order..."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the contest in this petition has been effectively redressed, no further orders are required and the petition has become infructuous.

3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs, Pendirrg miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed To, /ffRUE COPY// SD/.S. MALLIKARJUNA RAO OFFICER 1- one cc) to sRr AARE VENKATESWARA RAo, Advocate topucl 2. One cc: to sRt s.suRENDER REDDy, Advocate [opUc] 3. Two cos to Gj FoR HOME, High court for the State of rerangana at Hyderatrad [OUT] "*

4. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, Fligh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad {OUTJ

5. Two CD Copies \ BSR BS rT' ./ HIGH COURT DATET):12109t2025 \ \ \ \ i I I I I i ORDER WP.No.il1?13 of 2016 \ \ f ( ;\ )" J() * Ti{E S u 5 r[B 2020 * DISM]SSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRI"'CTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS 6qu(@ JW