High Court · 2025

Petition under Section l5'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of execution of the judgment and decree of the court of the XXVII Additional Chief Judge, CCC, at Secunderabad dt. 10/1 112014 made in MVOp. 681 of 201 1 Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. R ANURAc (SC FOR TSRTC) Counsel for the Respondent: SRI P. SRINIVAS The Court made the following: JUDGMENT ---7 THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO MACMA.N o. 509 0F 2022 JUDGMENI': This matter is settled before the Lok Adalat bonducted by the High Court Legal Services Committee for the State of Telangana uid.e award, dated 14. 12.2024.

2. In vieu, of the settlement arrived between the parties, this Motor Accidents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of accordingly. There sha1l be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if ary, shall stand closed Sd/- P.CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To,

1. The XXVII Additional chief Judge, city civil court at Secunderabad.(with //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER Records)

2. One CC to SRI R ANURAG (SC FOR TSRTC) Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRl. P. SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD CoPies (Copy of the Lok Adalat Award is Enclosed) HIGH COURT DATED: 3110112425 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.SO9 o12022 ' 1-,;: ii;ii5 ) 3 I l\PR t"..J z o 5 r> \i -/ DISPOSING OF MACMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD WTHOUT COSTS L \ I ] I BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD; [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Central Act)] SEB Date:, 14-12-2024 Present:1. Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi, {ro.mer Judge, Hon,bte High Courr for the st.te of Tetangana) Chairman

2.5ri Nayakawadi Ramesh, Advocate, Member

3.Sri K.Vasanth Rao, Advocate, Member / ,,n \ E t * M.A.C.M.A.NO.5O9 of 2022 (Before the Hon'ble High Court) AGAINST MVOP. No.681 of 2011 (On the fite of the XXVIT Addt. Chief Judge, City Civit Court, Secunderabad) Between:- The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its RegionaI Manager, GH Region, Persona[ Department, JB5, Picket, Secunderabad. AND .,.AppellanURespondent P.8abji, S/o.Satoman Raj, Aged about 30 years, Occ: Asst, Professor in CMR Engineering Cottege, R/o. Ftat No.47, Durga Nagar Cotony, lnjapur Vittage,Hayath Nagar Mandat, Ranga Reddy District. ...RespondenVPetitioner Counse[ for Appettant / TSRTC : Sri N. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate Counsel for Respondent/Petitioner : Sri p. Srinivas, Advocate Representative of TSRTC : Sri R.Shiva Kumar, Law Officer This appeat having been referred for settlement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed: I I fro,rre-t1,- [.@ l l j I I I I I T i I i i I I I AWARD Compensation Awarded by the Tribunat The petition is altowed with costs awarding compensation Rs.9,92,832/- and interest at 6% per annum from the date of petiti titt reaiization. Compensation Awarded (Setttement Reached ) in the Lok Adatat- The Corporation/TSRTC has preferred this Appeat aggrieved by the Award passed in MVOP No.681 of 2011 by the XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civit Court at Secunderabad. Sri R.Shiva Kumar, the Law Officer of TSRTC and the Respondent/ Petitioner atong with his counse[ have appeared before the Lok Adatat. During the pendency of this Appeat, the Appettant/TGSRTC and Respondent/Petitioner have entered into a setttement and in pursuance of the same, the Appetlant/TGSRTC has agreed to pay Rs.8,95,000/- (Rupees Eight lakhs ninety-five thousand onty) with the same interest i.e., @ 6% per annum from the date of petition titt the date of deposit and the Respondent/ Petitioner has agreed to receive the same towards futt and finat setttement of his ctaim. Accordingty, the compromise is recorded and the.case is settted before the Lok Adatat. ln view of the above sett{ement, the Appettant/TGSRTC shatt deposit the above said amount within (60) days from the date of receipt of copy of Award, after deducting the amount that was deposited, if any. The Certified Copy of Award shatl be made avaitabte to the petitioner within (30) days from today. ln the event of defautt or detay in making such deposit, the Respondent/Petitioner is entitted to claim interest as awarded by the tower court. I i i 1 I I q tcES i Apportionment of Compensation, if any Additional Direction(s,:

1. The Appettant is entitted to the refund of Court Fee paid in this appeat. 2. The amount atready deposited by the TGSRTC, if any, shatt be given credit to. 3. Soon after deposit by the TGSRTC, the Respondent/petitioner is permitted to withdraw the entire amount. ln loten of consent for the above settlement and award, the parties and their counset have signed this award in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of, ls\ul NI ,, rt *Ll"r,* t-? lz-->_ Appellant (s) -p,.r.. Arr | >-.t1 Respondent (s) g^L I I I I l ! i ! ; i I l I , i $lri#*ti l Counsel for the Appeltant (s) Counsel for the {'1"^>l r>+ (s) e n t- AJ,/ 3(to\( ' i lo MCHAIRA,IAN BER &n.a4 MEMBEi SER <J a HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT -l J 3 tee) l l ! t, I