✦ High Court of India · 28 Apr 2025

V. Kaladhar Reddy S/o v. Sripal Reddy, aged

Case Details High Court of India · 28 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
28 Apr 2025
Length
6,568 words

40.V. Kaladhar Reddy S/o. V. Sripal Reddy, aged 47 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 22-05, Venkateshwara Nagar, G.P. Road, Atmakur Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

41. Kavali Ravi Sio. Kavali Paramesh, aged 38 years, Occ: Agriculture Rio. H.No.1-18, Kismathpur, Harjan Basti, Rajendranagar, Rahga Reddy District

42. Bandhol Venkatamma Wo. Late B. Srinu, aged 46 years, Occ: Agriculture

43. Bandhol Shivakumar S/o. Late B. Srinu, aged 29 years, Occ: Agriculture

44. Bandhol Mahalaxmi D/o. Late B. Srinu , aged 27 years, Occ; Agriculuture

45. Bandhol Bhaneshwari D/o. Late B. Srinu, aged 25 years, Occ: Agriculuture RR- 42 - 45 are R/o. H.No. 2-16-1 , B.C. Colony, Jurial, Atmakur, Wanaparthy Dist.

46. Surampally Rajyalaxmi Wo. S. Muktheshwar , Aged 68 years, Occ: Agricu ltu re

47. Surampally Nagarajuna S/o. S. Muktheshwar, Aged 38 yeard, Occ: Agriculture

48. Surampally Bharath S/o. S. Muktheshwar , aged 36 years, Occ: Agriculture RR- 46 to 48 are R/o. H.No. 2'l-'17, Main Road, Atmakur Mandal, lVlahabubnagar District.

49. Kalva Ramulamma Wo. Buchilingam, aged 75 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. - - - H.No. 20-142, Main Road, Atmakur Man-dal, Mahabubnagar diririct.

50. Kalwa Badrinath S/o. Late Kalwa Buchilingam, aged 60 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. H.No. B-1-1411.1 , pldmaEnciau"e, f.feaiOrrgb [/Jti,a Temple, Karmanghat, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy Dist. 5'l . Kalwa Madhusudhan S/o. late Kalwa Buchilingam, aged 56 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/_o. H.No. 22-127|D, Slraswathi tiagar iotony, ktlnipei- Gaddinarum. Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy Districtl

52. Devudu Nayak S/o Dakiya , aged 45 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. H.No. 6_52. Balakistapur Thanda, Atmakur MandaI Mahabubnag'ar Disirici. 53.Girla Nayak_S/o_ Bandriyya \ayqk, aged 52 years, Occ: Agriculture Rio. H.No. 6-54, Balakistapur Thanda, Atmak"ur Mandat, tr/a'traOuOna-gai Di;fi"i "" (Respondents/ cross objector Nos. 36 to s3 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Respondent Nos. S, 30, 12, 15, 19,2{, X A 2r;;; court order dated 'zl-04-202s, vid; t.i.t;t.'3: d:d, i,1\,\i,'zi'a"ii of2025 in LAAS No.609 of201Zl' ...RESPONDENTS in LAAS No. 609 ot 2017 - and Cross Objectors in Cross Objections l.A. NO: 2 OF 2017(LAA SMP. NO: 1552 O F 20171 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High court may be pleasetto grant interim stay of all further proceedings in pursuance to the orders dated:13.04.20'1 7 made in LAop.No.2612011 on the fite of senior civit luJte, Gadwal and pass Counsel for the Appellant in LAAS No. 609 ol 2017 and Respondent in Cross Objection No.29 OF 2022 : Gp FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondents in LAAS No. 609 of 2017 and Cross Objectors in Cross Objection No. 29 of 2022 : SRI A. KRANTI KUMAR REDDY L.A.A.S.NO: 61 o oF 2017 And cRoss oBJ ECTIONS NO. 28 0F 2022 Appeal Under section 54 of 'L.A.Act of '1894 and cross objections Under oLlL" order 4'1 Rute -22 of civir procedure code, 1 908 against the Judgment in o.P.No. 28 ol 201r on the fire of the court of the senror civit luige, Gaowai "nJ Between: The Special Deputy Coilector, L.A. Unit RLISp_lt, pebbair AND _ :.. Petitioner/ Respondent in LAAS and Respondent in Cross Objections No. rB oi2};ia '1. Musti Venkataiah, S/o.Laxmaiah, Age 65 years, Occ Agriculture, 2 lrla..ze.er Khan, Sio Khader Khan, Age 63 years, Occ Agriculture ( died per LR 30)

3. Nazeer Khan, Sio.Khader Khan, Age 63 years, Occ Agriculture, (died per LR 3t)

4. Sai Babu, S/o.Pandu Rangam, Age 35 years, Occ Agriculture, 5. MD.Ayub Khan, Sio.Mahebub Khan, Age 48 years, Occ Agriculture, (Not filed Claim statement))

6. Sriman Narayana, S/o.Kurmanna, Age 53 years, Occ Agriculture, 7. Sri Hari, S/o_Kurmanna, Age 45 years, Occ Agriculture, 8. Sriman Narayana, S/o.Kurmanna, Age 53 years, Occ Agriculture, 9. Venkatamma, Wo_Kurmanna, Age 70 years, Occ.Agriculture, 10. Kurmanna, S/o.Jalanna, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture, ( died per LRs 32 & 33) '11. Smt Balamma, Wo.Buchanna, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture, (died per LRs 34 & 35

12. Smt.Manemma,, Wo.poshanna, Age 5g years, Occ Agriculture. '13. Mohammed Abdul Gaffar, S/o.Fakruddin, Age 58 years, Occ Agriculture, ' (Died Per LRs RR - 47 to 51 )

14. Buchanna, S/o.Laxmanna, Age 57 years, Occ Agriculture, 15. Ramulu, S/o.Chinna Kurmanna, Age 5g years, Occ Agriculture, 16. H.Kurmakka, Wo.Devalapally Karenna, Age 63 years, Occ Agriculture, 17.T.Konda Reddy, S/o.Ranganna, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture, '18. Smt. Sugunamma, Wo.Savaranna, Age 45 years, Occ Agriculture, '19. Chinnaiah, S/o.pedda Kurmanna, Age 45 years, Occ Agriculture, 20. B.Venkatamma, Wo.srinivasulu, Age 43 years, Occ Agriculture, 21 Smt Devemma, Wo.Ashanna, Age 63 years, Occ Agriculture, ( died per LR - 36)

22. Smt. Shantamma, Wo.Shankaranna, Age 65 years, Occ Agriculture, 23. Dr. K. Rajeshwari, Wo.Ravikanth, Age 40 years, Occ Agriculture, 24. MD.Ayub Khan, S/o.Mahabub Khan, Age 48 years, Occ Agriculture, (Not filed claim statement)

25. Devakamma, Wo.Krishanaiah, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture, 26. P.Saibaba, S/o. pandurangam, age, 45 years, Occ Agriculture, 2T.Chandramma, Wo.Chandranna, Age 65 years, Occ Agriculture, ver v! v (died per LRs RR - 52 to 54 ) - vv '

28. Venkatamma, Wo.Srinivasulu, Age 43 years, Occ Agriculture, 29. Venkatamma,. Wo.Kurmanna, Resident of Atmakur eroper ana'ilti"jdii( ;iJ;, f.g.e 70 years. Occ Agriculture, (All are LRs RR _ 37 to 46

30.Zaheda Sultana Wo. Late Mohd. Nazeer Kham, aged about 65 vears. Occ: H o u s h otd R/o H. N o. 9_a_86/2s. Saiirj., n g C J;' v--" l*-,i,i,j, f io#;i;* (C.T. amended ,.A.no..16 of 2019 iscarried outin LAAS No.6.l0 of 2017 deceased Resoondent No. Z a" p"rLC iJ-n"e-rpondent No. 30 vide Court order dated 29_01_2020) 'i vi '! \euvv, 31 .Zaheda Sultana. W/o Lgtg_\ilohd. Nazeer Kham, aged about 65 vears. Occ: Ho u sh otd R/o. H. No gJ_ao/2 5, S j rliir-n"s i; b;i:6;i"*;;: i;j ; ffi ;; "" (C.T. amended l.A.No 20 oI^2019 is carried out in LAAS No. 6.,l0 of 2017 deceased Resoondent No. S as pei tn No 31 vide Court Order dated 29 -O 1 _202u ) "iifE.i,lrl,oent 32- M.Linganna, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 33. tvl.Ramulu, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. (C.T. amended l.A.no. 1.2 o1.2019 is carried out in LAAS No.610 of 2017 deceased Resoodnenf rlo^^10_as nerLi.G F""bono"nt. jz a 5i, iii", Court order adtea zg_ol_zoiol - "-' E! rv vr I \soPv

34. M.Linganna, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal, lr/lahabubnagar District, 35. M.Ramulu, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ( C.T. amended l.A.no. 0g of^2019 is carried out in LAAS No. 6.10 ol 2017 deceased Resoondenr r,lo o ai lei iR;';itilp;"dents 34 & 35 , vide Court orderddted29-01-2O2Ot- "- -''v vr LvoPv' ^t

36. P.Krishnaiah, R/o.Atmakur village and mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ; l I d i ( C.T. amended LA.no. 04 ot 2019 is carried out in LAAS No. 610 ol 2017 deceased Respodnent No. 21 as per LRs of Respondents 36 , vide Court Order dated 29 -01 -2020)

37.G. Bhagyalaxmi, Wo late G.S. Anjaneyulu, age 69 yrs (Daughter)

38. Kalva Srinivasulu, S/o Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M. Kurmanna, age 68 yrs. (Son)

39. Padmavathi, Wo V. Laxminarayana, age 67 yrs (Daughter)

40. Kal.vjt Srimannarayana, S/o Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M. Kurmanna, age 64 yrs(Son)

41. Gosi Chandrakala, Wo Srinivasulu Yadav, age 63 yrs, (Daughter) 42. Prabhavathy R. Musty, Wo M. Ramchandrappa, age 62 yrs (Daughter) 43.Musti Srihari, S/o Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M. Kurmanna, age 5g yrs (Son) 44.Kalva Anuradha, Wo Y. Manikyavara Prasad, age 52 yrs, (Daughter) 45.M. Parimala, Wo M. Giridhar, age 50 yrs, (Daughter)

46. Kalva Vishnuvardhan, Sio Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M. Kurmanna, age 48 yrs(Son) RR- 37 to 46 are Occ.Agrrculture R/o Atmakur Village and Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

47. Mohammed Abrar, S/o Mohammed Abdut Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, aged 47 yrs 48.Abdul Hameed, S/o Mohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, aged 44 yrs 49.Khla Moinuddin, S/o Mohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdut Gafar, age 33 yrs 50.Abdul Khadar, S/o Mohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, aged 2g yrs 51. Md. Jaffer, S/o Mohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, aged 26 yrs RR-47 to 51 are Occ.Agriculture, R/o Atmakur Village and Mandal, Wanaparthy Diskict.

52. Pittala Sathyanna, S/o Pittala Chandranna, age 68 yrs

53. Pittala Srinivasulu, S/o Pittala Chandranna, age 61 yrs

54. Pittala Ramulu, S/o Pittala Chandranna, age S1 yrs. RR- 52 to 54 are Occ.Agriculture, R/o Atmakur Village and Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ( Respondent Nos- 37 to 54 are brought on record as LR'sof deceased Respondent Nos. 29, 13 &27 as perCourt Order dated 2811-2024 vide LA.no.3,6&9of 2024 in LAAS No.610 of 2017)

55. G.Bhagyalaxmi, Wo. Late G.S.Anjaneyulu, Age 69 years (Daughter) l I I I /

56. Kalva Srinivasulu, S/o. Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M.Kurmanna, Age 68 years (Son )

57. Padmavathi, Wo. V.Laxminarayana, Age 67 years (Daughter)

58. Kalva Srimannarayana, Sio. Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M.Kurmanna, Age 64 years (Son)

59. Gosi Chandraala, Wo. Srinivasulu Yadav, Age 63 years (Daughter)

60. Prabhavathy R. Musty, Wo. M. Ramchandrappa, Age 62 years (Daughter)

61. t\/usti Srihari, S/o. Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M.Kurmanna, Age 59 years (Son) 62. Kalva Anuradha, Wo. Y.Manikyavara Prasad, Age 52 years (Daughter)

63. M Parimala, Wo. M.Giridhar, Age 50 years (Daughter)

64. Kalva Vishnuvardhan, S/o. Late KalVa Kurmanna @ [/.Kurmanna, Age 48 years (Son) RR-55 to 64 are Agriculture R/o. Atmakur Village and Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Respondent Nos. 55 to 64 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Respondent No. 9 as per Court Order dated 09-01-2025, Vide LA.No. 12 of 2024 in LAAS No.610 of 2017.) ...RESPONDENTS in LAAS No. 610 of 2017 and Cross Objectors in Cross Objection No.28 of 2022 Counsel for the Appellant in LAAS No. 610 ol 2017 and Respondent in Cross Objection No.28 OF 2022 : GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondents in LAAS No. 609 ot 2017 and Cross Objectors in Cross Objection No. 28 of 2022 : SRI A. KRANTI KUMAR REDDY LAAS NO, 611 OF 2017 AND cRoss oBJEcTtoN NO. 30 0F 2022 Appeal Under Section 54 of L.A.Act ot 1894 and Cross Objection Under Order 41-Rule -22 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the Judgment and Decree passed in O.P.No. 53 ol 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal. Between: The Special Deputy Collector, LA Unit RLISP-ll, Pebbair ...Petitioner / Respondent in LAAS No. 611 ot 2017 and Respondent in Cross Objection No.30 of2022 AND '1. Kursali Ramulu, Sio.Poshanna, age 65 years (died) per Lrs, 2. K.Veeranna, S/o.Late K.Ramulu, age 51 years, Occ: Govt. Employee and agriculture, Rio.Atmakur Village and Mandal.

3. K.Devakamma, D/o.Late K,Ramulu, age 56 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal. 4 K.Bhagyamma, D/o.Late K.Ramuln, age 54 years, Oce Agriculture, R/o.Wanaparihy.

5. K.Laxmi, Wo. M.Venkatesh, age 48 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Atmakur Village and Mandal. (Brought on record vide 1A.No.51512015, dated 23.09.2015 as claimants 1 to 5) ...RESPONDENTS in LAAS No. 611 of 2017 and Cross Objectors in Cross Objection No. 30 of 2022 l.A. NO: 2OF 2017LAASMP. NO: 1556 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in pursuance to the orders dated:'13.04.2017 made in OP.No.53/2012 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal. Counsel for the Appellant in LAAS No. 61'l of 2017 and Respondent in Cross Objection No.30 OF 2022 : GP FOR APPEALS Counsel for the Respondents in LAAS No. 611 ot 2017 and Cross Objectors in Cross Objection No. 30 of 2022 : SRI A. KRANTI KUMAR REDDY The Court delivered the following Common Judgment: I I ] l I I J l i l I II ,/ THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA L.A.A.S.Nos.509 610 AND 61rOF 2017 AND CROSS OBIECTIONI Nos.28,29 AND 30 QF 2022 COMMON IUDGMENT: (Per Hon'bte Sri Jushce Abhinand Kumar Shavili) Since the issue involved in all these appeals and cross objections is one and the same, all these appeals and cross objections are being heard and disposed of by way of this common judgment

2. When the matters are taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the cross objectors-claimants had informed the Court that the [ands in question were acquired by the State for the purposc of cxcavation and forming embankment of parallel canal from Priyaclarshini Jurala Project. The State has acquired large extent of lanci for the said purpose. When some of tl.re land losers sought refcrence, the reference Court has fixed the compensation at Rs.385/- pcr Square Yard in O.P.No.7 of 2011, dated13.04.2017. Aggrievecl by the same, the State has preferred an appeal before this Gurt ancl the same was numbered as L.A.A.S.No.599 of 2077 i I 2 AKS,J & ETD,J L A A.S-No.609 of 20 t7 & batch and the claimants therein have also preferred an appeal i.e. L.A.A.S.No.50 of 2027 seeking further enhancement of compensation, and a Division Bench of this Court zride common judgment, dated 28.09.2022, was pleased to dismiss the appeal preferred by the State and allowed the appeal preferred by the claimants therein and enhanced the compensation from Rs.385/- per Square Yard to Rs.700/- per Square yard. Aggrieved by the common judgment, dated 28.09.2022, the State has carried the matter to the Honourable Supreme Court by filing S.L.P.(Civil).No.1918 of 2024 and the Honourable Supreme Court was pleased to dismiss the same oide order, dated-10.07.2024 Therefore, the subject matter of the present cases is squarely covered by the conunon judgment, dated 28.09.2022, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.Nos.599 cf 2017 and 50 of 2027. Tl-rerefore, following the aforesaid judgmen! dated 28.09.2022, the appeals preferred by the State are liable to be dismissed and the cross objections preferred by the claimants deserve to be allowecl, by enhancing the market value of the acquired land to Rs.700/- per Square Yard. ) AKS.J & ETD,J L.AA.S.No 609 ot2017 & batch

3. Learued Government Pleader for Appeals appearing for the appellant did not dispute the same. 4 In view of tl.re same, this Court is of the considered view that the appeals preferred by the State are liable to be dismissed and the cross objections preferred by the claimants deserve to be allowed by enhancing the market value of the acquired land to Rs.700/- per Square Yard

5. Accordinglv, L.A.A.S.Nos.609, 610 and 6'11 oI 20-17 dismissecl ancl Cross Objections Nos.28, 29 and 30 of 2022 are allowed, in terms of the common judgment, dated 28.092022, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.Nos.599 of 2017 and 50 of 2027, which was confirmed by the Honourable Supreme Court, and the market value of the acquireC land is enhanced to Rs.700/- per Square Yarcl with all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act. However, it is made clear that the cross objectors sl-rall pay deficit Court Fee, if any, on the enhanced compensation amount. There shall be no order as to costs. f*-- . 4 AKS,.J & ETD,.I L.A.A.S.No.609 of2O17 & batch Miscellaneous Applications, if any, pending sl-rall stand closed. To Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// CTION OFFICER 1 The Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District ( with records ) 2. Two CCS to GP FOR APPEALS, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad 3. One CC to SRl. A KRANTI KUMAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies t(irl/PSL W HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 + DECREES COMMON JUDGME\*T 1rl E Clr 1 I AUE 2025 -.Ez * (J ( * LAAS.Nos. 609 , 610 and 611 of 2017 DISMISSING'THE AI,I, APPF]AI,S AND ALLOWINC THL CIROSS OB.IECTIONS WITH OUT COSTS 1 @" 1V g IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE TWENry EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA L.A.A.S NO. 609 OF 2017 AND CROSS OBJECTION 29 OF 2022 Between: The Special Deputy Collector, LA Unit RLTSP-Il, Pebbair AND ...APPELLANTS in LAAS No. 609 of 2017 and Respondent in Cross Objection No. 29 of 2022

1. S.Nagaraj, S/o.Salwa Reddy, Age 22 years, Occ Agriculture, 2. S.Narsimha, S/o.Salwa Reddy, Age 25 years, Occ Agriculture, 3. Padmannma, Wo.Salwa Reddy, Age 35 years, Occ Agriculture, 4. D.Sheshi Reddy, S/o.Laxrnaiah, Age 70 years, Occ Agriculture, 5. Smt Sarojamma, Wo.Gopal, Age 30 years. Occ Aoriculture, ( Died oer LRs RR- 36 to 39 in LAAS No. 609 ol 2017 and Crosl Objectori in Cioss Objections No. 29 of 2022)

6. Kurmanna, S/o.Yellappa, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture, 7. Eshwaramma, Wo.Kurniarina, Age 70 years, Occ Agriculture, 8. Gattanf,a, S/o.Kurmanna, Age 40 years, Occ Agriculture, 9. Balanna, S/o.Chinnaiah, Age 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, 10.Bal Raju, Sio.Chinna Parmanna, Age 28 years, Occ; Agriculture,

11. Kashimanna, S/o.Bala Kistanna, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture,

12. Pedda Parmanna, S/o.Bala Kistanna, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture. (Died per LR. - Respondent No. 4'l in LAAS No. 6Og ot ZOIZ a"nd Cross ' Objector in Cross Objection No. 29 of 2022 |

13. Kurva Dayyam Karrenna, S/o. Edanna, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture,

14. Kurva Nadipi Edanna, S/o.Pedda Edanna, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture,

15. Kurva lrlalamma, Wo Balgiah, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture, ( Died per LR's Respondent Nos. 42 to 45 in li\aS f.f o. eOdot Zof T;;e a;Js; Objectors in Cross Objection No. 29 of ZOii y

16. Kurva Balamma, Wo.pedda Mallaiah, Age 65 years, Occ Agriculture '17. Kurva. Mannemma, Wo.Chinna Mallaiah, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture, !o!eo n91 LRs Resp^ondent Nos. 31 & 32"in Lehs ruo. sos ;r ioii lno uross ob;ectors in Cross Objection No. 29 of 2022 )

18. Lambadi Seethamma, Wo.Late Bheemla, Age 45 years, Occ Agriculture, 19.S-Muktheshwar, S/o.S.Ramylr, 4g9 60 years. Occ Agriculture ( Died per LRs RR- 46 to 48 in LAAS No. 6d9 or io't7-a;i ciosJ oujecior"-in'-' Cross Objection No. 29 ot 2O22 ) -

20. S.Shankaraiah, S/o.S.Rannulu, Age 65 years, Occ Agriculture, 21. Musti Satyamma, D/o.pullaiah, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture, 22.Lambadi Rukinamma, V_V1q B,a{r1a.Age 50 years, Occ Agriculture, ( Died oer LR - Re_spondent No.-s3 in LAAS NA 60ri;i rb17 ,"i'C,.iiil"oi;;tffi: Cross Objection No. 29 ol ZOZ2 ) --

23.Lambadi Shivamm, W9.Dq[i]r,.", Age 50 years, Occ; Agriculture, ( Died oer LR Respondent No. _s2 or LAas"r{o.eos or iorTini Cr;;;"6li;;ff; Cross Objection No. 29 ot 20221

24. K.Ralaiah, S/o.K.Narayana, Age 50 years, Occ Agriculture, 25. K.Sudhakar, S/o.K.Narayana, Age 4g years, Occ Agriculture, 26. Kaladhar Reddy, S/o Sripal Reddy, Age 30 years, Occ Agriculture, 27.K.Madhu Sudhan, S/o. Buchilingam. Age 35 years, Occ Agriculture, 28. K.Barinath, S/o. K.Buchilingam, Age 46 years, Occ Agricutture, 29.K.Prabha.kar, Sio.Buchilingar.n,-{O_e Q0 years, Occ Agriculture ( Died per LR,s Respondent Nos. 49-51 r-n LAA-S tto.'OOC oizOf T;nd a;;s,st-bj;i;.-;;' Cross Objection No. 29 ol 2022 ) 30. Jayamma, D/o.Jagannath F4gy, 4S" 70 years, Occ Agriculture, ( Died oer LR.- Respondeit No. no ot ib,,- in Laas-ivi. eos".i zbli,ria-El!!' Objecror in Cross Obiection) (Al Resid;;ts oinO.it*Fioi,";;;J':" Mandal) -' --' 31 K. Rgi{S/o Late Mallanna , aged about 32 years Occ: Agriculture R/o. plot No. .102, NTR Nagar, Mailapur] Uppai, nJnga R"=OOy Oi.t,"i"i- 32. Narsimha S/o. Late Mallanna , ag_ed about 2g years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 34-8't/88, NTR Nagar, rr,taitapul Uppith;i; neooy-oi-trrctl, "'- 33. S. Narasimha Rao. S/o Late S. Shankaraiah, aged about 48 years, Occ: 34 s siddeshwar S/o rate s. shankariah, aged about 46 years occ: Agricurture 35. S. Ramesh S/o. late S. Shankariah, aged about 40 years Occ: Agriculture Agriculture ( All are R/o. H No. 18_90, Shivajinagar, Atmakur Village and Mandat, Mahabubnagar District. ) (Respondents/ cross o.tjector Nos. 31 and 32 and 33 to 35 are brouoht on record as LRs of _dis-eased Respondenl N-o;.lt & 2d-ui'i.i'6l,tn o-rder dated 11+.2-zoz1 vide r.A.Noi a a a di zirb in-r_-iluilo"'eiU"or 2017 respectively )

36.Jqlqgari Ramesh S/o. Gopal , aged 49 years , Occ: Agriculture R/o. H.No. 6-76, Musapet Addakat, tuaniUIUnagii bi"trti-

37. Jalugari Ashok Kumar, S/o.-Gopal , aged 47 years Occ: Agriculture R/o. 8-1 2t 1 4, Vinayaka Nagar, Atmikui u"anoai, fuinaouon jg;i D;;il.. " " 38.Jalugari Shekar S/o. Gopal,.aged 40-years. Occ: Agriculture R/o.644, Vinayaka Nagar. Atmakur Maidat, trllitrabtionalar oistrict.

39.Anjaneyulu Jalugari S/o Gopal,.aged 37 years, Occ: Agriculture Rio. H.No. 8-1 1, Vinayaka Nagar, Atmaiur'M;nJai, Ni#;-duinagar District.

40.V. Kaladhar Reddv S/o._V Sripat Reddy, agel) !7 years, Occ: Agriculture, Vq t-.t t'lo 22-05, Venkatestrwara t{agZi.E p noro, ntmr-r.J.niinjr['-, Mahabubnagar District. o'[i{311?'':lh5fii jt'ft '#:.S;Sfl :ff :,{ffi:&::dg!:,A:f.fl8i"u., 42.Bandhol Venkatamma Wo. Late B. Srinu, aged 46 years, Occ: Agriculture 43. Bandhol Shivakumar Sio. Late B. Srinu, aged 29 years, Occ: Agriculture 44. Bandhol Mahalaxmi D/o. Late B. Srinu , aged 27 years, Occ; Agriculuture 45. Bandhol Bhaneshwari D/o. Late B. Srinu, aged 25 years, Occ: Agriculuture - 45 are R/o. H.No. 2_16-1, B.C. Cotony, Juriat, Atmakur, Wanaparthy B[..0, Agriculture

46. Surampally Rajyalaxmi Wo. S. Muktheshwar , Aged 6g years, Occ: -'i|llT,?f,'y Nalarajuna s/o s' Muktheshwar, Ased 38 veard, occ: 4S.Surampally Bharath S/o. S. Muktheshwar, aged 36 years, Occ: Agriculture RR- 46 to 48 are R/o. H.No. 2.1-17, Main Road, Atmakur Mandal, Mahabubnaqar District.

49. Kalva Ramulamma Wo Buchilingar-nr aged 75 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 20-142, Main Road, Atmak"ui Nia;hi, rrari-rlrl,nrgri di;dd'-, '"" 50. Kalwa Badrinath S./o. Late Kalwa Buchilingam, aged 60 years, Occ: Ag ricu ttu re R/o. H. No. B - 1 _ 1 4 t 1 j, p"d ;;fh;iail8;'rrr"i i o, ig'a -ttffi Temple, Karmanghat, Saroornagar, nangiieJdy'Dist.

51. Kalwa Madhusudhan S/9 lqte Kalwa Buchilingam, aged 56 years, Occ: Agricutture, R/o. H. No 22- 1 27 tD, Sairs;;ih; ti;s;r. i"lory k;ilp;i" Gaddinarum, Saroornagar, nanga neddy Distiict]*'

52. Devudu Nayak S/o. Dakiya , aged 45 years, Occ: Agriculture Rt/o. H.No. 6-52, Balakistapur Thanda, Atmakur MandaI Mahabubna!'ar District.

53. Girla Nayak_S/o . Bandriyya Nayak , aged 52 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. H No. 6-54, Balakistapur Thanda, Atmakur Mandal, Mahabubnalar District. (Respondents/ C_rqss Objector Nos. 36 to 53 are brough LRs of deceased Respondent Nos. S, 30, 12, 1S, 19, 29-, Court Order dated 28-04-2025, vide l.A.Nos. 3:, 6,9, 12, ol 2025 in LAAS No. 609 ot 2O1Zl t on record as 23 & 22 as per 15, 18,21 & 24 ...RESPONDENTS in LAAS No. 609 of 2O1Z and Cross Objectors in Cross Objections Appeal Under Section 54 of L.A.Act of 1894 and Cross Objections Under order 41 Rule 22 of civil Procedure code, 1g0g against the Judgment and Decree passed in o.P.No. 26 of 2011 dated 1g-04-2017 on the file oi the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusinq the qrounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court bi.'low anE the iraterial papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of G.p. for Aooeals on behalf of the Appellant in LAAS No. 60{of 2017 and nespondJniin Cross Obi-ection No. 29 of 2O2Z and Sri A. Kranti Kumbr Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent in L.A.A.S. No. 609 of 2017 and Cross Objectors in Cross Objection No. 29 of 2022. This Court doth order and decree as follows: That the Appeal is dismissed and cross objections be and hereby is alowed, in terms of the common judgment ,dated 28-0g-2022, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.Nos. 599 of 2017 and S0 of 2021 , which was confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced to Rs. 7001- per Square Yard with all statutory bbnefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. 2 Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAO INT REGISTRAR To

1. The Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal, Mahabubnaga 2. Two C.D.Copies W SEc'lroy'r. o4{rtEL I AFF HIGH COURT DATED 2110412025 DECREL LAAS.No.609 ol 2017 And CROSS OBJECTIONS NO.29 OF 2022 DISMISSING THE LAAS AND ALLOWING THE CROSS OBJECTIONS WITHOUT COSTS 1 112 $ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE TWENW EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA L.A.A.S.NO: 610 OF 2017 And CROSS OBJECTIONS NO. 280F 2022 Between: The Special Deputy Collector, L.A. Unit RLISP-Il, Pebbair AND ... Petitioner/ Respondent in LAAS and Respondent in Cross Objections No. 28 of 2022

1. Musti Venkataiah, S/o.Laxmaiah, Age 65 years, Occ Agriculture, 2. Nazeer Khan, S/o.Khader Khan, Age 63 years, Occ Agriculture ( died per LR 30)

3. Nazeer Khan, S/o.Khader Khan, Age 63 years, Occ Agriculture, (died per LR 3'l)

4. Sai Babu, S/o.Pandu Rangam, Age 35 years, Occ Agriculture, 5. MD-Ayub Khan, S/o.Mahebub Khan, Age 48 years, Occ Agriculture, (Not filed Claim staternent))

6. Sriman Narayana, S/o.Kurmanna, Age 53 years, Occ Agriculture, 7. Sri Hari, S/o.Kurmanna, Age 45 years, Occ Agriculture, 8. Sriman Narayana, S/o.Kurmanna, Age 53 years, Occ Agriculture, 9. Venkatamma, Wo.Kurmanna, Age 70 years, Occ.Agriculture,

10. Kurmanna, S/o.Jalanna, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture, ( died per LRs 32 & 33) 11- Smt Balamma, Wio.Buchanna, Age 60 years, Occ Agriculture, (died per LRs 34 & 35

12. Smt.Manemma,, W/o.Poshanna, Age 58 years, Occ Agriculture. '13. Mohammed Abdul Gaffar, S/o.Fakruddin, Age 58 years, Occ Agriculture, (Died Per LRs RR - 47 to 51 )

14. Buchanna, S/o.Laxmanna, Age 57 years, Occ Agriculture,

15. Ramulu, S/o.Chinna Kurmanna, Age 58 years, Occ Agriculture,

16. H.Kurmakka, Wo.Devalapally Karenna, Age 63 years, Occ Agriculture,

17.T.Konda Reddy, S/o.Ranganna, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture, 18-Smt. Sugunamma, Wo.Savaranna, Age 45 years, Occ Agriculture,

19.Chinnaiah, Sio.Pedda Kurmanna, Age 45 years, Occ Agriculture,

20. B.Venkatamma, Wo.Srinivasulu, Age 43 years, Occ Agriculture,

21. Smt Devemma, Wo.Ashanna, Age 63 years, Occ Agriculture, ( died per LR - 36)

22. Smt. Shantamma, Wo.Shankaranna, Age 65 years, Occ Agriculture,

23. Dr.K.Rajeshwari, Wo.Ravikanth, Age 40 years, Occ Agriculture,

24.MD.Ayub Khan, Sio.Mahabub Khan, Age 48 years, Occ Agriculture, (Not filed claim statement)

25. Devakamma, Wo.Krishanaiah, Age 55 years, Occ Agriculture,

26. P.Saibaba, S/o. Pandurangam, age, 45 years, Occ Agriculture,

27. Chandramma, Wo.Chandranna, Age 65 years, Occ Agriculture, (died per LRs RR - 52 to 54 ) 2S.Venkatamma, Wo.Srinivasulu, Age 43 years, Occ Agriculture,

29.Venkatamma,, Wo.Kurmanna, Age 70 years, Occ Agriculture, (All are Resident of Atmakur Proper and Mandal) ( died per LRs RR - 37 to 46 30.Zaheda Sultana W/o. Late Mohd. Nazeer Kham, aged about 65 years, Occ: Houshold R/o. H.No. 9-4-86125, Salarjung Colony, Golconda, Hyderabad. (C.T. amended l.A.no. 16 of 2019 is carried out in LAAS No. 610 of 2017 deceased Respondent No. 2 as per LR of Respondent No. 30 vide Court Order dated 29-01 -2020) 31 .Zaheda Sultana, Wo. Late Mohd. Nazeer Kham, aged about 65 years, Occ Houshold R/o. H.No. 9-4-BOl25, Salarjung Colony, Golconda, Hyderabad. (C.T. amended l.A.No. 20 of 20'19 is carried out in LAAS No. 610 oI 2017 deceased Respondent No. 3 as per LR of Respondent No. 31 vide Court Order dated 29-0 1 -2020)

32. M.Linganna, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District

33. M.Ramulu, R/o.Atmakur Village and [Vlandal, Mahabubnagar District. ( C.T. amended LA.no. 12 of 2019 is carried out in LAAS No. 6'10 of 2017 deceased Respodnent No. 10 as per LRs of Respondents 32 & 33 , vide Court Order dated 29-01-2020)

34. M.Linganna, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District

35. M.Ramulu, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar Diskict. ( C.T. amended I.A,no. 08 of 2019 is carried out in LAAS No. 610 of 2017 deceased Respondent No. 10 as per LRs of Respondents 34 & 35 , vide Court Order dated 29-01-2020)

36. P.Krishnaiah, R/o.Atmakur village and mandal, Mahabubnagar District. ( C.T. amended l.A.no. 04 o't 2019 is carried out in LAAS No. 610 of 2017 deceased Respodnent No. 21 as per LRs of Respondents 36 , vide Court Order dated 29-01 -2020)

37.G. Bhagyalaxmi, Wo late G.S. Anjaneyulu, age 69 yrs (Daughter)

38. Kalva Srinivasulu, S/o Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M. Kurmanna, age 68 yrs. (Son)

39. Padmavathi, Wo V. Laxminarayana, age 67 yrs (Daughter)

40. Kal.v^a Srimannarayana, S/o Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M. Kurmanna, age 64 yrs(Son)

41. Gosi Chandrakala, W/o Srinivasulu Yadav, age 63 yrs, (Daughter)

42. Prabhavathy R. Musty, Wfo M. Ramchandrappa, age 62 yrs (Daughter)

43. Musti Srihari, S/o Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M. Kurmanna, age 59 yrs (Son) 44.Kalva Anuradha, Wo Y, Manikyavara Prasad, age 52 yrs, (Daughter)

45. M. Parimala, Wo M. Giridhar, age 50 yrs, (Daughter)

46. Kalva Vishnuvardhan, Sio Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M. Kurmanna, age 48 yrs(Son) RR- 37 to 46 are Occ.Agriculture R:/o Atmakur Village and Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

47. Mohammed Abrar, S/o lvlohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, aged 47 yrs 48.Abdul Hameed, S/o Mohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, aged 44 yrs 49. Khaja Moinuddin, S/o Mohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, age 33 yrs 50.Abdul Khadar, S/o Mohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, aged 28 yrs 5'1. Md. Jaffer, S/o Mohammed Abdul Gafar @ Abdul Gafar, aged 26 yrs RR-47 to 5'1 are Occ.Agriculture, R/o Atmakur Village and Mandal, Wanaparthy District.

52. Pittala Sathyanna, S/o Pittala Chandranna, age 68 yrs

53. Pittala Srinivasulu, S/o Pittala Chandranna, age 61 yrs

54. Pittala Ramulu, S/o Pittala Chandranna, age 51 yrs. RR- 52 to 54 are Occ.Agriculture, R/o Atmakur Village and l\rtandal, Wanaparthy District. ( Respondent Nos. 37 to 54 are brought on record as LR'sof deceased Respondent Nos.29, 13 &27 as per Court Orderdated 2811-2024vide l.A.no. 3, 6 & 9 of 2024 in LAAS No. 610 o't 2017)

55. G.Bhagyalaxmi, Wio. Late G.S.Anjaneyulu, Age 69 years (Daughter)

56. Kalva Srinivasulu, S/o. Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M.Kurmanna, Age 68 years (Son)

57. Padmavathi, Wo. V. Laxminarayana, Age 67 years (Daughter)

58. Kalva S_rimannarayana, S/o. Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M.Kurmanna, Age 64 years (Son)

59. Gosi Chandraala, Wo. Srinivasulu Yadav, Age 63 years (Daughte|

60. Prabhavathy R. Musty, Wo. M.Ramchandrappa, Age 62 years (Daughter)

61.Musti Srihari, S/o. Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M.Kurmanna, Age 59 years (Son) 62. Kalva Anuradha, Wo. Y.Manikyavara Prasad, Age 52 years (Daughter)

63. M.Parimala. Wo. M.Giridhar, Age 50 years (DaughteQ

64. Kalva Vishnuvardhan, S/o. Late Kalva Kurmanna @ M.Kurmanna, Age 48 years (Son) RR-55 to 64 are Agriculture R/o. Atmakur Village and Mandal, Wanaparthy District. Respondent Nos. 55 to 64 are brought on record as LRs of deceased Respondent No. 9 as per Court Order dated 09-01-2025, Vide l.A.No. 12 of 2024 in LAAS No. 610 ot 2017.) ...RESPONDENTS in LAAS No. 610 of 2017 and Cross Objectors in Gross Objection No.28 ot 2022 Appeal Under Section 54 of L.A.Act of '1894 and Cross Objections Under Order 41 Rule -22 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 against the Judgment and Decree in O.P.No. 28 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal - This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of G.P. for Appeals on behalf of the Appellant in LAAS No. 609 of 20i7 and Respond6nt in Cross Objection No. 29 of 2022 and Sri A. Kranti Kumbr Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent in L.A.A.S. No. 609 of 2011 and Cross Objectors in Cross Objection No. 29 o'f 2022. This Court doth order and decree as follows:

1. That the Appeal is dismissed and Cross Objections be and hereby is allowed, in terms of the common judgment ,dated 28-09-2022, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.Nos. 599 of 2017 and 50 of 2021 , which was confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 7

2. That the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced to Rs. 7001- per Square Yard with all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act.

3. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Sd/- K. SRINIVASRAO JOINT REGISTRAR To

1. The Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Dist. 2. Two C.D.Copies *t"''. la Kul/PSL M- HIGH COURT DATED:2810412025 DECREE LAAS.No.610 ot 2017 And CROSS OBJECTIONS NO 28 OF 2022 DISMISSING THE LAAS AND ALLOWING THE CROSS OBJECTIONS WITHOUT COSTS 1 f./ IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA LAAS NO. 611 0F 20't7 AND cRoss oBJEcTloN No. 30 0F 2022 Between: The Special Deputy Collector, LA Unit RLISP-ll, Pebbair AND ...Petitioner / Respondent in LAAS No. 611 ol 2017 and Respondent in Cross Objection No. 30 of 2022

1. Kursali Ramulu, S/o.Poshanna, age 65 years (died) per Lrs, 2. K.Veeranna, S/o.Late K.Ramulu, age 51 years, Occ: Govt. Employee and agriculture, Rio-Atmakur Village and Mandal.

3. K.Devakamma, D/o.Late K,Ramulu, age 56 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Atmakur Village and Mandal.

4. K.Bhagyamma, D/o.Late K.Ramuln, age 54 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o.Wanaparihy.

5. K.Laxmi, Wo, M.Venkatesh, age 48 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Atmakur Village and Mandal. (Brought on record vide lA.No.515/2015, dated 23.09.2015 as claimants 1 to 5) ...RESPONDENTS in LAAS No. 611 ol 20'17 and Cross Objectors in Cross Objection No. 30 of 2022 Appeal Under Section 54 of L.A.Act of 1894 and Cross Objection Under Order 41-Rule -22 of Civil Procedure Code, '1908 against the Judgment and Decree passed in O.P.No. 53 ol 2012 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Court below and the material papers in the case and upon hearing the arguments of G.P. for Appeals on behalf of the Appellant in LAAS No. 609 of 2017 and Respondent in Cross Objection No. 29 ot 2022 and Sri A. Kranti Kumar Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent in L.A.A.S. No Objectors in Cross Objection No. 2g of 2022. 609 of 2017 and Cross This Court doth order and decree as follows:

1. That the Appeal is dismissed and cross objections be and hereby is allowed, in terms of the common judgment ,dated 28-09-2022, rendered by this Court in L.A.A.S.Nos. 599 of 2017 and S0 ol 2021, which was confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 2. rhat the market value of the acquired land be and hereby is enhanced to Rs. 7001 per Square Yard with all statutory benefits as stipulated under the amended Land Acquisition Act. 3. That the Cross objectors shall pay deficit Court Fee, if any, on the enhanced 4. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. compensation amount. To Sd/- K. SRINIVASRAO JOINT REGISTRAR \ ECTTDN a{{lcEF_

1. The Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar Dist. 2. Two C.D.Copies HIGH COURT DArED2810412025 DECzu]E LAAS No.61 l of 2017 And CROSS OBJECTIONS NO. 30 OF 2022 DISMISSING THE LAAS AND ALLOWING THE CROSS OBJECTIONS WITHOUT COSTS '1)

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments