✦ High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 26 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
26 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,234 words

16. Ch. Syamalarao, S/o.Ramachandra Rao, Age.54 / Assistant, GHS Bandimit, Paatigadda, Secunderabad, H,rr '17. G.Suresh, S/o.G. Sriramulu, Age.43 years, Occ. Sc SCience), GHS Begumpet no 2, Secunderabad, Hyderatz 18. K.Sunil Kumar, S/o.K.lmmanuel, Age.49 years, Oc: (Science), GHS( T ) Golconda, Hyderabad. 1 9- J.Vijayakumar, S/o.J Dharma rao , Age.48 years, O ; ([/aths), GBHS Nampally, Borabanda, Hyderabad

20. Bhallamudi Rambabu, S/o.B Satyanarayana, Age.49 Assistant (Maths), Govt. High School, Esamiabazar, Hyd= 21. M.Kumari, D/o.Venkataiah, Age.49 years, Occ.School . GHS lndiranagar, Khammam, Khammain District.

22.Dasi Kavitha, D/o.D.Laxmi Narayana, Age.43 years, Cr (t\Iaths), GHS Mamillagudem, Near RandB Guest House 23. R.V.Varalakshmi, Dio.R Venkateshwar Rao, Age.5'l r Assistant (Science), Govt Girls High School, Khammam 24. G.Sandhya Rani D/o.G.Ramalingeswara Rao Age.4[i Assistant (Maths), SRRIr/,GHS, Banigandlapadu, Errupak> 25.M.Jayaraju, S/o. Nagabushanam, Age.52 years, Occ. GHS(lVR) Yellandu, Bhadradri kothagudam

26.Ch.Laxman, S/o.Odelu, Age.46years, Occ.School Govt.Hish School (OLD), Jagtial, Jagtial district :ars, Occ. School erabad ool Assistant (Bio d School Assistant .. School Assistant ears, Occ. School \ssistant (Science), :. School Assistant (hammam ears, Occ. School years, Occ.School r(tVdl), Khammam School Assistant, \ssistant (Maths), 27 .Y.Ravi Kumar, S/o. Kailasam, Age.46 years, Occ. Schcc Govt. High School, Padmanagar, Karimnagar. I Assistant (ft/aths),

28. R.Srinivas, S/o.R Gopal, Age.50 years, Occ. School Assir Girls, Dharrnapuri, Jagtial District. tant (N/aths), ZPHS

29. P.Thirupathi, S/o Pochaiah, Age.43 years, Occ. Schoo Govt.High school (Gunj), Karimnagar, Karimnagar

30.B.Ravinder, S/o.l\/allaiah, Age.51 years, Occ.School Govt.High School (New) Jagtial, Jagtial District 3'1 . N.lndira Saraswathi, D/o.N. Jagannatham, Age.48 / Assistant (Science), Govt.High School (Gunj),'Karimnagar 32- Palukuri Seshu, S/o.Venkulu, Age.46 years, Occ. Scho: S.V.A.R.Govt. t\ilodel High School, Pylon Colony, Nagarjr district Assistant (lVaths), Assistant (lVaths), rars, Occ. School Karimnagar. Assistant (Maths), nasagar, Nalgonda

33. K.Padmakumari, D/o.K.V.Narahari, Age.53 years, Oc. (English), GGHS, tVlalbowli, Nalgonda District. School Assistant

34. Bandaru Ravi Kumar, S/o.B-Joseph, Age.42years, Occ. ii Science), SVARGovt. I\/odel High School, Pylon Nalgonda District. ;hool Assistant (Bio Colony,N.SO.Dam,

35. AVSSR Murthy, S/o.Anjaneyulu, Age. 47years, Schoc I Govt. High school, Panagal, Nalgonda District. Assistant (ttlaths),

36. Kola Kiran Kumar, S/o.K Babu, Age.44 years, Occ. Staff I diet, Adilabad, Adilabad district utor. E.L.T.C., Govt

37. P.Rajendram, S/o. Ramachandram, Age.56years, Oc(:. (social), MP UPS Laxmipuram, I\,4d I Parkal, District Warar r School Assistant al. I I r'

38.V.Janardhan, S/o.V.Mallaiah, Age 47 years, Occ. School Assistant (Maths), GHS Banjarahills, Hyderabad District.

39. G.Shankaraiah, S/o.G.Manikyaiah, Age.50 years, Occ. School Assistant (lt/aths), GHS Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad-District.

40.B.Narasimha, S/o.B.Anathaiah, Age.44 years, Occ. School Assistant (Maths), GHS Yousufguda, Hyderabad District.

41. M.Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Muthaiah, Age.45 years, Occ. School Assistant (Maths), GHS Red Cross, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad.

42. Sreevani Annamaraju, D/o.A.Madanagopal, Age.43 years, Occ. School Assistant, GHS Addagutta, Maradepally, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND 1 The State of Telangana, School Education Department, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 3 Commissioner of School Education, Government of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad. Telangana State Public Service Comrhission, Rep. by its Secretary, Nampally, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or directlon more pa(icularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in i not preparing separate seniority list for Zonal Cadre School Assistants recruited under Notification No 4i1997 issued by APPSC and ii treating the posts ol Zonal Cadre Schoot Assistants as District Cadre posts though their unit of appointment is Zone but nol District and iii rejecting the petitioners representation vide proceedings in Memo No 6957/Services ll/A 212016 dl1ll12l2018 issued by the '1st Respondent as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of A(icles 14, 16,21, 311 and 371D of the Constrtution of lndia and contrary to A P Public Employment Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment Order, 1975 and consequently set aside the impugned proceedings dt 10 122018 and direct the respondents to prepare separate seniority list for Zonal Cadre School Assistants with all consequential benefits including notional promotions, arrears of pay, etc. Prayer is amended as per C.O dt.2617121 in lA 1/2019. I lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section r51 cpc praying that in t r ) circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High (.ourt may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners rep r -.sentation dt.1 1 . 10.201 8 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with raw pending disposar of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the petitioner : M/s.A.V.S.LAXMt Counsel for the Respondents No..l&2 : Gp FOR SERVT( ES I Counsel for the Respondents No.3 : The Court made the following: ORDER -_ , 6t THE HON,BLE SRI ,USTICE NAMAVARAPU RA]ESHWAR RAO w ET TI No I 19 OF 201I ORDER: This writ petiticn is filed aggrieved by the order'' dated

10.12.2018 passed by the 1't respondent'

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing' learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that against the order, dated 10'12'2018 passed by the 1't respondent' the petitioners have filed fresh writ petition i'e" W'P'No'28t77 of 2019 and therefore, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication In view of the above submission' the writ petition is closed' .,) No order as to costs As a sequel thereto, mtscellaneous applications' if any' shall stanci closed. SD/-M. JAWAHAR REDD SISTANT REGI R //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to M/s A V.S LAXMI' Advocate lOPUCl 2 Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES l' High Court for the ate of Telangana'

3. Two CD CoPies BSK BS HIGH COURT DATED:2610912025 ORDER WP.No.41419 of 2018 :R THE S I4 I t(J I, ) 1 \, 0{ rFg Im z P, I * PArcH CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS U{,, k.,, I

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments