✦ High Court of India · 09 Dec 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 09 Dec 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
09 Dec 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
2,281 words

1. Mr.lrfan Baig. M.M.A. Baig,S/o. Kurban Ali, Aged 37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 33 years, Occ: Business. 3. Mr.Mustafa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 32 years, Occ: Business. (All are R/o. H.No.11-5-548, Red Hills, Hyderabad.) AND l. The State of Telangana, Through Police Station Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by ) Public Prosecutor. G.Krishna Motkur, GM (HN4WSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Hills. Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Complainant ..Petitioners/ Accused. IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section {82 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances statcd in the afiidavit filcd in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Addl Chief Metropolitan lvlagistratc, at Hyderabad before P.S. Nampally, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Crin.rinai Re vision. Counsel for the Pctitioners: Ms. R.N. Padma. Courrsel for the Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor Corrnsel for the Rcspondent No.2: -- Crl.R.C.No.3240 of 2018 Criminal revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the c()nrrnon order datctl A2.04.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6537 of 20-17 in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on thc file oi the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. Between:

1. Mr.lrfan Baig, M.M.A. Baig, S/ o. Kurban Ali, Aged 37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 33 years, Occ: Business. 3. Mr.Mustafa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 32years, Occ: Business- (All are R/o. H.No.11-5-548, 1{sd Flills, Hyderabad.) AND

1. The State of Telangana, Through Police Station Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by Public Prosecutor.

2. G.Krislura Motkur, GM (HMWSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/ Accused. ...Respondents/Complainant. lA NO:3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the afficlavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad before P.S. Nampally, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. R.N. Padma. Counsel for the Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor. Counsel for t[.re Respondent No.2: -- Crl.R.C. No.3241 of 2018 Criminal revision filed under Sechons 397 Ez 401, Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the corrmon order dated 02.04-2078 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1755 of 2018 in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. Betweer-r

1. Mr.Irfarr Baig, M.M.A. Baig,, S/ o. Kurban Ali" Aged 37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 33 years, Occ: Busincss. 3. Mr.Mustafa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 32 years, Occ: Business. (Al1 are Rr/ o. H.No.11-5-548, Red I lills. Hyderabad.) AND

1. The State of Tclangana, Through Police Station Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by Public Prosecutor-

2. G.Krishna Motkur, GM (HMWSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Hiiis, Hyderabad. ... Petitioners/ Accused. ... Respondents/ Complainant. IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praving that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Addl Chief Metropoiitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad before P.S. Nampally, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. R.N. Padma. Counsel for the Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor. Counsel for the Respondent No.2: -- Crl.R.C.No.3243 of 2018 Criminal revision filed under Sections 397 & 407 Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the conrmon order dated 02.04.2018 passed ir.r Crl.M.P.No.812 of 2018 in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. Between:

1. Mr.lrfan Baig, M.M.A. Baig, S/o. Kurban At, Aged 37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 33 years, Occ: Business. 3. Mr.Mustafa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali" Aged 32 years, Occ: Business. (All are R/o. H.No.11-5-548. Red Hills. Hyderabad.) ...Petitioners/Accused. AND

1. The State of Telangana, Through Police Station Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by Public Prosecutor.

2. G. Krishna Motkur, GM (HMWSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Complainant. IA NO:3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. prayi-r'rg that in the circurnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad before P.S. Nampally, Hyderabad pending disposal of the ahove Criminal Revision. Crl.R.C.N o.32tl4 of 2018 Criminal revision filctl under Sections 397 & 407 Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the conmon order dated 02.04.2018 passed in CrI.M.P.No.3538 of 2017 in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Additiorral Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. Betlvecn:

1. Mr.lrfan Baig, M,M.A. Baig, S/ o. Kurban Ali, Aged 37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 33 years, Occ: Business. 3. Mr.lllustafa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 32 yeas, Occ: Business. (All are R/o. H.No.l1-5-548, Red Hills, Hyderabad.) AND

1. The State of Telangana, Through Police Station Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by Public Prosecutor.

2. G.Krishna Motkur, GM (HMWSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Complainant. ...Pctitioners/ Accused. IA NO: 2 OI 2018 Petition undt'r Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filctl in srrpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to sta.v all further prrreedings in CC No. 62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Addl Chief Metropolitan Magishate, at Hyclerabad before P.S. Nampally, Hvderabad pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. R.N. Padma. Counsel for the Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: -- Crl.R.C.No.3245 of 2018 Crinrinal re.vision filed under Sections 397 & 40L Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the common ordcr datcd 02.04.2018 passed in Cr1.M.P.No.1050 of 2018 in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. Between:

1. Mr.lrfan Baig, N{.lr{.A. Baig, S/ o. Kurban Ali Aged 37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 33 years, Occ: Business. 3. Mr.N'[ustafa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 32years, Occ: Business. (All are R/o. H.No.11-5-548, Rcd Hills, Hyderabad.) ...Petitioners/ Accused. AND

1. The State of Telzrngana, Through Police Station Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by Public Prosecutor.

2. G.Krishna Motkur, GM (HMWSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ... Respondents/ Complainant IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Addl Chief Metropolitan Magislrate, at Hyderabad before P.S. Nan-Lpally. Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision. Counsel for the Petitioncrs: Ms. R.N. Padma. Counsei for the Respondent No-1: The Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Rcspondent No.2: -- Crl.R.C. No.3247 of 2018 Crirninal revision filed under Sections 397 & 40-1, Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the common order dated 02.04.2018 passcd in Crl.M.P.No.1621 of 2077 in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. Between:

1. Mr.lrfan Baig, M.M.A. Baig, S/ o. Kurban Ali, Aged 37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 33 years, Occ: Business. 3. Mr.Mustafa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 32 years, Occ: Business. (AIl are R/o. H.No.11-5-548, Red Hills, Hyderabad.) AND

1. The State of Telangana, Through Police Station Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by Public Prosecutor.

2. G. Krishna Motkur, GM (HMWSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ...Petitioners/ Accused. ... Respondents/Complainant. IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No. 62 of 2011 on the file of the XiI Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad before P.S. Nampally, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Criminal Revi-sion. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. R.N. Padma. Counsel for the Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor. Counsel for the Rcspondent No.2: -- Crl.R.C.No.3290 of 2018 Criminal revision filed under Sections 397 & 40-1, CI.P.C. aggrieved by the common order dated 02.04.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1968 of 2018 in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hvderabad. Between:

1. Mr.lrfan Baig. M.M.A. Baig,S/o. Kurban Ali, Aged 37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban AIi, Aged 33 years, Occ: Business. 3. Mr.MustaIa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali. Aged 32 years, Occ: Business. (All are R/o. H.No.11-5-548, Red Hills, Hyderabad.) AND

1. The State of Telangana, Through Police Station Nampallp Hyderabad. Rep. by Public Prosecutor. G.Krishna Motkur. GM (HMWSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Flills, Hyderabad. 2 ...Respondents/Complainant ... Petitioners/ Accused. IA NO: 3 O[:2018 Petition undcr Section {ti2 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filerl in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in CC No.62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistratr,, at Hydcrabacl before P.S. tr-ampa1ly, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Criminal Rcvisiot.t. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. R.N. Padma. Counsel for the Resl.rondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor Counsel for the l{esporrdent No.2: -- Crl.R.C.No.3359 of 2018 Crimin.rl revision filetl under Sections 397 &. 4O7 Cr.P.C. aggrieved bv the comnon orcler datetl r)2.04.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.6536 of 2017 in C.C.No.62 of 2011 on thc file of the XII Additional Chief lr4etropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad. Between:

1. Mr.lrfan Baig, NI.M.A. Baig, S/ o. Kurban Ali, Aged,37 years, Occ: Business. 2. Mr.Rehman Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 33 years, Occ Business. 3. Mr.Mustafa Baig, S/o.Kurban Ali, Aged 32years, Occ: Business. (All are R/o. H.No.11-i-548, Red Hills, Hyderabad.) AND

1. The State of 'l elangana, Through Police Station Nampally, Hyderabad. Rep. by Public Prosecubr.

2. G.Krishna Motkur, GM (HMWSSB) Red Hills Zone, Red Hills, Hyderabad. ... Petitioners/ Accused. ... Respondents/ Complainant. IA NO:3 OF 2018 Petition unclor Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in srrpport of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further procecdings in CC No. 62 of 2011 on the file of the XII Addl Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hydcr.rbad bc'fore P.S. Nampally, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision. Counsel for the Petitioners: Ms. R.N. Padma. Counsel for the Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor. Counsel for the Respondcnt No.2: -- The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER:: THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA Tr. CRIMINAL PETITIOT{ No.3O3 of 2O18 and Crl.Rc.Nos. 3 161,3240, 324 7,3243, 3244, 3245,3247,3290 and,3359 OF 2ora Date 09.L2.2O25 T!.Cd,P.No.3q0 o! 20rQ B9.l!ween:- Irfan [3aig @ M.M.A. Raig ancl two others Petitioners r/ accuserl Nos. l to 3 Vs The State of Telangar-ra ancl another, COMMON ORDER: Ilespondents When thcse matters are taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the above said cases have ended in acquittal ancl, therefore, the Transfer Criminal Petition and Criminal Re',.ision Cases have become infructuous

2. Recording the said submission, thc Transfer Criminal Petition and Criminal Revision Cases ar-e dismissed as in lructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, i[ any, shall stand closed. / /TP.UF.C]}PY/ / ) sD/- N SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECIION OFFICER 'fo, 1 The )OI Ad<i{ional Chic,f -Metropolita4 MactAqale_ qt !!ydg-ra!qd.

2. Ono CC to VIs. R.N.l)at1nra, Advocate [OPUCI 3. -l'hc Station House Officer, Nampa lly Policc Station, Hyderabatl. 4. dp(lc to thc Public ltosocutor, Hilih Court Builciings, Hyderabad. [€E€l 5. 1 u,o CD Copics. w ,CKl PSL Co\n) I IIIGI{ COUITT DATED:09/ t2l 1025 \ CON'IMON ORDI)R Tr.Crl.l'. No.3()i i,l 201U, Crl. R-C. No.31(r l, 3240, 3241, 3243, 3244, 32+5, 3247 , 3291J & 3359 ol 20l8 JHET t 3 i JAN 2ft7F * * Dismissing the Tr.Crl.I'. & Crt.R.Cs. as infructuous. 4 ..pJt clY Xs"

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments