The High Court · 2025

...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT 2. State of Telangana, rep. by P.P., High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTIRESPONDENT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.361 of 2017 of Subedari Police Station, Warangal Urban District, in respect of the petitioner. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLPMP. NO: 11743 OF 2017) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Cr.No. 361 of 2017 of Subedari Police Station, Warangal Urban District pending quash petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B. Chennaiah representing Sri V. Siddhartha Goud, Advocate for the petitioner, Sri M. Vivekananda ReCdy, Assrstant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri T. Chandra Shekar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. The Court made thr-' following: COMMON ORDER CRIMINA PETITION NO: I oF 2017 Between: Madishetti Srinivas, Sio. Late Sadashivadu, Aged 38 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No 15-4-331, Kakatiya Talkies, Warangai. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 2 AND

1. Ennapu Reddy Raji Reddy S/o. Rami Reddy, Aged 57 years, R/o. Neerukulla Village, Athnrakur Mandal, Warangal Districf. 2 State of Telangana, rep. by P.P High Co Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAIN ANT urt at Hyderabad for the State of RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Menrorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to qui:sh the proceedings in Cr.No.361 ol 2O17 of Subedari polilce Station, Warangal Urban District, in respect of the petitioner. l.A. NO: I OF 2017(CRLPMP. NO:11 oF 20171 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Mernorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in cr.No. 361 of 2o1z of subedari Police Station, Warangal Urban District pending quash petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of crim'nal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri p. prabhakar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner sri M. Vivekananda Reddy, Assistant public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of sri r. chandra shekar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. The Court made the following: ORDER THE HOhI'EBLI} SITI JTJSTICE J.SFLEENIVAS F'AO CR.IMINAL I\[os.1O54a and 1 5OO of 2OLZ I i : COMMON ORDER 'l'hese: tlt,o criminal petitions have: bccn filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedttre, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.) bV thc petitiorters, who were arrayed as accused Nos.l and 2, secking to quash ttre proceedings against thern in Crimc No.36l of 2017 of Subedari Police Station, Warangal Urban District, for the offences punisfrable undcr Scct.iorrs 420, 406, 468, 387, 471 rlw 34 of ttrc lnclian l)cnal Code, lU6O (for short'lPC)'

2.F{ence,thesetwocriminalpetiLionswerelreard LogeLh.er and erre bcilrg ciispcised of by this cotnlaron order' learned l'tcarcl Mr't]'Ctrennaiah' courtsel' 3. representing Mr'V'Siddhartlra Goud'' learned counsel for the pctitioncr in Crl'P'No' 10548 of 2Ol7 ' Mr'P'Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel CrI.t).No-1O5OO of 2OL7' Mr'T'Chan<1ra Shekar' learned counsel appearing on behalf of responclent No' 1 / de facto Mr. M .Vivckananda ReddY, learned comPlainant and on behalf of Prosecr-rtor aPPearln[I Assistant Public the petitioner 2 respondcnt No.2 ir both the criminai pc-:titions 4 - After pcrllserl .f th<: recorcl, it rcvr:zlls that on I 3. I I .2o 17 r [ris oot-rrt ',v]rilc: zrclmir ting r hc orimirr^l Petition Nr',.1o50o of 20t7 firecr by a<:cusecl No.2 passed order ir-r crl. p- M. p. No. 1 16g2 c>f 20r7 , and, thr: Investigating Agency is r.lircctcd to follow the procedure l;aicl clown under Section 41-A of cr.r).c ancr guidclines formurrated by thc: Apex court in "Arnesh Kumar v. state of Bihar and another 1 " 5 l'carnecr Assisrant I)urrlic pr.scc,tr>r sLrbmitted that thc Investigating ()fficcr wilt folror,,,, .he guidelines formulatcd by thc I{on'brc Apex court in Arnesh Kumar (supra) ir-r bolh th<: <:ascs procedurc

6. Taklng into consideration thc: above said submissi''>,s, witrr.ut expressing any view on the merits of the case Investigating ofricer is directccr to folrow the ers contcmplatcd undcr Section ,1 l_A of Cr.p.C 64uiderines formulatcd b-y thc I-Ion'trle Apex court rn Arnes h Kuma r guprtl, <:omplete the investigation and shall filt: final report as expeditiously as possible, preferabl.y rn,ithin a period of three (3) months from the and the 1 (2014) 8 SCC 273 I I I I i i I a J date of receipt of copy of this Order. .fhe cooperate with the Investigating Officer. 7 ' z\cc,rcli,gly, both the criminar petitions are disposed petitioners .fr.ff of. Miscellaneous applicaLions, pending if ?oy, shall stand closed. sDl:llSrNrvAsA REDDY ASSISTANT REGTSiilR /TRUE COPY// G SECTION OFFICER I t To,

2. 1' The rVAdditionar Judiciar First crass Magistrate at warangar JHrr,ilil,,iJrr,Jorr" officer, Subedari potice station, warangar lffi":r?:Jlr33fr'olic Prosecutor, Hish court for the state of retangana at 3

4. One CC to SriV. Siddhartha Goud, Advocate tOpUCI 5. One CC to Sri p. prabhakar Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl 6. One CC to Sri T. Chandra Shekar, Advocate tOpUCl 7. Two CD Copies VH/PSL HIGH COURT DATED: 19108 t?:025 I v/i =)i I ?TffiT;5 5r I COMMON ORDER CRLP.No.10548 and 10500 ot 2017 DISPOSING OF BOTH THE CRIMINAL PETITIONS M rt E(