Tummala Vijaya Lakshmi v. I State of Telangana
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the submissions made by both sides' the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents consider the application made by the petitioner for regularization and pass appropriate orders as per G.O.Ms.No. 179, Revenue (Assn.I) Department, dated 01'09 2018 and communicate the…
Judgment
Cause title
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the application made by the petitioner under G.O.Ms.No.'166 Revenue (Assn.POT) Department dated- 16.2.2008 in respect of house bearing municipal no.8-2- 686112, admeasuring 600 sq. yards under old sy.no.l29, corresponding to new sy.no.403, situated at NBT Nagar, Road no.12, Banjarahills, Shaikpet, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice, and also in violation of Articles '14, 19 and 300-4 of the Constitution of , i I l I : i I I I i I i I I i I I I i I t I India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of subject property in accordance with G.O-[/1s.No.166 Revenue (Assn.POT) Department dated- 16.2.2008, forthwith and immediately. l.A. NO: 1OF 20'17 (wP MP. NO: 47436OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of house bearing municipal no.8-2-686/12, admeasuring 600 sq. yards under old sy.no.129, corresponding to new sy.no.403, situated at NBT Nagar, Road no 12' Banjarahills, Shaikpet, Hyderabad made under G.O.Ms.No.166 Revenue (Assn-POT) Department dated'. 16.2.2008, forthwith and immediately, pending disposal of the above writ petition . Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER i I I I i i I THE HON'BLB SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH / WRIT PETITION N0.38193 0F 2017
ORDER:
I{eard Leamed Counsel appearing for the petitioner and leamed Assistanl Government Pleadet for Revenue appearing for the respondents and perused the entire material on record. Leamed Counsel for the petition or submits that the petitioner is
questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the application made by the petitionel as pel G.O Ms No' 166, Revenue (Assn.l) Department, dated 16.02'2008 in respect of house bearing municipal No.8-2-686/12, admeasurinq (r00 square yards under old Sy.No.129, corresponding to new Sy.No.40l. situated at NBT Nagar, Road No. 12, Ilanj ara I'lills, Shaikpet. I tyclcrabad. After filing of the application by the petitioner. the (lovernm:ut issued G'O'Ms No'58, Revenue (Assn.I) Department, dated i0.12.201'l and G'O'Ms'No'59, Revenue (Assn.I) Department, dated 30. 1 2.20 t4. l'he Government has given an undertaking that they wilt not implcrnent the G'O'Ms'No' 166, Revenue (Assn.I) Department, datecl l6-02-2008, in view of issuance of G.O.Ms.No.58, Rcvenue (Assn.I) Dcpartmcnt- dated 30' t2'2014 and Q.O.Ms.No.59, Revenue (Assn.I) Departntent' dated l0'12'2014 in I 2 SK,J W.P.No.38193 of 20 17 PIL.No.517 of 2013, dated 10'09'2015 filed before this Court' After filing of the instant writ petition, the Government of Telangana issued G.O.Ms.No.l79, Revenue (Assn I) Department' dated 01'09'2018 in pursuance to the G.O.Ms.No 166, ltevenue (Assn'l) Department' dated
16.02.2008 and also G.O.Ms No 59, Revenuc (Assn'I) Depaftment' dated 30.12.2014 and requested to direct the respondents to dispose of the application made by the petitioner as per G'O Ms'No'179' Revenue (Assn.I) Depaflment, dated 01 09'20I8' Learned Assistant (loverunlent Pleader for Revenue subrnits that
they are not dispuring thc subrnission made by the learned counsel lor the petitioncr and thcv rvitl consider the casc of the petitioncl' as per G.O.Ms.No. 179, I{cvcnuc (Assn'l) Department' dated 01'09 20t8 and the respondents will pass appropriate orders as per law'
In view of the submissions made by both sides' the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents consider the application made by the petitioner for regularization and pass appropriate orders as per G.O.Ms.No. 179, Revenue (Assn.I) Department, dated 01'09 2018 and communicate the same to the petitioner' There shatl be no order as to \ costs. 3 SK,J W.P.No.38193 of 2017
Misce llaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. \ To, 1 //TRUE COPY// SD/- L. LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER at, State of The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secre Telangana, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Hyderabad District, at Chirag AIi Lane. Hyderabad 3. The Revenue Divisional gfficer Hyderabad , Divisi6n, Hyderabdd District 4. The Tahsildar, Shaikpet Mandal, Hyderabad District. 5. One CC to Sri Mohd Moin Ahrned Ouadri, Advocate tOpUCl 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the Statej of Telangana, at 7. Two CD Copies (+ Hyderabad [OUTJ TJ GJP HIGH COURT DATED:3010112025 : i : i I I I I I I ORDER WP.No.38193 of 2017 I ,1u ST4>6 { ? I .1 ?r.,|25 ? * 0 * '1(;1) DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ?r 1 q
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.