✦ High Court of India · 15 Apr 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,036 words

THE HONOURABLE SRI USTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NOS: 284 1 AND 36833 0F 2017 W.P.NO: 28481 OF 2017 Between: Appala Lasmai, W/o. Appala Chinn House wife Rl/o Secendrapoor village Rajanna, Aged about 46 years, Occ Jakranpally Mandal Nizamabad District. AN ...PETITIONER The State Of Telangana, by its Princi Hyderabad. The District Collector Nizamabad Dist The Revenue Divisional Officer, Arm r Division Nizamabad, dist. The Tahsildar, Jakranpally tVandal, N Smt. Ausali Laxmi W/o Late Gangara Jakranpally lt/andal, Nizamabad Dist. Rl/o Secendrapoor, village, zamabad Dist 2 J 4( al Secretary Revenue Department, at ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the C nstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fil therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of ll notice dated 0'1 .5.20'l 7 under rule 3 o (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules 2007 with e respondent No.4 in issuing the form the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Lands t giving any details regarding the date of assignment, nature of assignment, nat order resuming the land in survey N Secundrapur village, Jakranpally tt/landal, re of transfer and thereby passing the 187111 extent Ac 1.00 situated at rzamabad vide Procgs No. 8/305/2017 dated 27.5.2017 and vide No. 8/305/201 violation of principles of natural justice a (Prohibition of Transfers) Act 1997, contra 499 consequently set aside Form ll noti daled 28.7.2017 as arbitrary, illegal, d contrary to the AP Assigned Lands to the ratio laid down in 2017 (1) ALT vide 8/305/20'1 7 dated 01 .5.2017 and consequential proceedings issued vide Procgs No. Bl3o5l2a17 daled 27.5.2017 and 28.7.2017. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 35431 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ctrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the of the order passed by the respondent No. 4 vide No B/305/20'1 7 dated 27.5.2017 and consequential order passed by the respondent No.4 vide No.B/305i2017 dated 28.07.2017 pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: AGP FOR ASSIGNMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.5: - W,P.NO: 36833 OF 2017 Between: Appala Lasmai, W/o Appala Chinna Rajanna Aged about 46 years Occ House wife Rl/o Secendrapoor village, Jakranpally l\,4andal, Nizamabad District. AND ..PETITIONER

1. The State of Telangana Rep. by its Princrpal Secretary Revenue Department, at Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector Nizamabad District., 3- The Revenue Divisional Officer, Armoor Division, Nizamabad District. 4. The Tahasildar, Jakranpally [/landal, Nizamabad District. 5- Smt. Ausali Laxmi, W/o Late Gangaram Rl/o Secendrapoor village, Jakranpally lr/andal, Nizamabad Distrct- ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue writ or order or direction more partrcularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the aclion of the respondent No.3 in rejecting the stay petition filed by the petitioner along with appeal on 19.8.2017 vrde Case No. 431325712017 dated 24.09.20'17 (served on 24.10.2017) in the appeal filed by the respondent No- 5 is arbitrary and illegal and also violative of principles of natural :..' -' 1 I ! I t i '! I justice and contrary to the provisions of th ROR Act 1971 and non application of mind consequently set aside the same. t.A NO: 1 OF 2017 WPMP. NO: 45736 OF 017 Petition under Section 151 CPC pra ing that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to interfere into the pe land in Sy.No. 187/'1 1 extent Ac '1 .00 Nizamabad District pending disposal of the ceful possession and enjoyment of the ituated at Secundrapur, Jakranpally, main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GUDI MA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: Counsel for the Respondent No.5: -- HUSUDHAN REDDY GP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court made the following: COMMON RDER I I , ; I i I I l 1 SIi, J W.P.\()s 2S431 and 36a33 ol20 I7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.28481 and 36833 of 2OL7 COMMON ORDER: As the common issue is involved rn both these writ petitions and the parties are similar, they are being disposed of by this cornmon order. 2 Heard learned counsel lor the pctitioner and learried .{ssisLant Government Pleader Ibr Assignment :rn ci peruscd the enlirr: material on record r I 3 I-earned Assistar-rt Government Pieader for ,Assignment has produced a letter issucd by the respondcrnt No.4-'l'ahsildar in Lr.No.B/305 I2017 dated

07.O2.2025 stating that alter filing these ri'rit petitions, the respondcnt authorities have mutatccl the name of the petitioncr in the r(,'venue records nith regard to the suit schedule property and also issued new pattadar passbooks to the per,itioner and in vicrv of the said instructions, thc cause in the \.rit petlt.ions does not survlve. %E\' -:-::;, 2 sl\ ,r w.lJ Nos.2848t iuxt 36833 of 2il t7

4. In view of the sub issior-r of the learned Assistant Government pleader for Assignment, the Writ Petitions arc closed. No order S to CoSTS, 5 Miscellane ous pe titio s. il any pending 111 thcse writ pctitions, shall stan c lo scd I I To //TRUE OPYII SD/. T. JAYASREE DEPUW REGISTRAR sechforrrcen 1 2 a One CC to SRI GUDI MADHUSUDH Two CCs to GP FOR ASSIGNI/ENT at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies N REDOY, Advocate [OPUC] High Court for the State of Telangana, PSK, GJP HIGH COURT DATED:1510412025 COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.28481 AND 36833 ot 201 + -_ s r,.l , (.- (r ( o n { 1 1 AUE 2025 !.,t .:,% ; : ttE o

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments