The High Court · 2025

,a praying that in the High Court may be ri Writ of Mandamus. cering th,: objections rr: 7th Respondent to ing No. 23-4-561 and ying to thr: petrtioners in permiiting the 7th lry to tho guidelines violative cf the A.P. ris guaranteed u nder Articlesl4, 19, 21 , 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 7th Respondent not to erect the Aircel telephone tower at lvlehterwadi, Sultan Shahi, Hyderabad. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 2987 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the erection / construction of Aircel telephone tower adjacent to the Houses bearing Nos. 23-4-561 and 23-4-559, lVlehterwadj, Sultan Shahi, Hyderabad-65, pending the disposal of the above Writ Petition. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 4635 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To amend and substitute the prayer in the above sard Writ petition as under:- That thrs Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 6, in considering the objections made by the petitioners, dated 07-1 1-2015 in permitting the 7th Respondent to erect the Airel telephone tower adjacent to the house bearing No. 23-4-561 and 23-4559, Mehterwadi, Sultan Shahi. Hyderabad-65, belonging to the petitioners and further declaring the actron of the Respondents 1 to 6 in permitting the 7th respondent for erecting the Aircel telephone tower contrary to the guidelines issued in G.O. MS. NO.96, l\,4unicipal Administration & Urban Development (lr/1) Department, dated 5-8-2015, and also violative of the A.P. Buildings Rules, 2012, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of rights guaranteed under Articlegl4, 19, 21, 300-A of the Constitution of lndia, and contrary to the Judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court and consequently direct the 7th Respondent not to erect the Aircel telephone tower at Mehterwadi, Sultan Shahi, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P. VINOD LAL(NONE APPEARED) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: SRI RAPARTHI VENKATESH (SC FOR GHMC TELANGANA) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S and 6: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYI' I,A ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.2370 of 20 ORDER: When the Writ Petition was listed ort '2 ) 08'2025, Lhere \\'as no representation on behalf of the petition: 'r; and irs such' thisCourtdirectedthemattertobelistedunderther:aptitln.for dismissal'. Even though the matter is listed, today, r't rler the caplion

2. 'for dismissal', none appears for the petitioners; lt appears that lhe petitioners are not interested to prosecute t I ) matter' 3 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disrr issed fot non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs 4 . Miscellaneous applications pending, if a r1', shall stand closed I i l SD/.B. REKHA RANI I SSISTANT REGISTRAR .<=.'_.'.--- SECTION OFFICER -r //TRUE COPY// I \ \., To,

1. One CC to Sri P. Vinod Lal Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Raparthi Venkatesh (SC for GHMC I I |.ANGANA) tOPUql 3. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration Urban bvelopmernt, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. Two CC to The GP for Home, High Court for the Stzr' ) of Telangana' at HyderabadlOUTl 5. Two CD Copies TJ BS \g\\, I l l I I l l : i I I j i I I : i l l HIGH COURT DATED:0810912025 ORDER WP.No.2370 of 2016 o ( * T SIe 2 | rr:B 2026 2 * .\.., :li DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOIi NON- PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS .^\ tA* o SK.