✦ High Court of India · 16 Sep 2025

High Court · 2025

Case Details High Court of India · 16 Sep 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
16 Sep 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,408 words

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filecl therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring lhe actrons of the Respondent No.4 in trying to lay a Road in the Petitioner No.1's Land admeasunng Ac.0-38.5 guntas covered under Sy.No.'1 171lA, situated at Ramayampet Village and lvlandal, Medak District, and the Petitioner No.2's Land admeasuring Ac.0-38.5 guntas covered under Sy.No.1171lA, situated at Ramayampet Village and [Vlandal, Ivledak District, totally admeasuring Ac.'1 -37 guntas, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles, 14, 21 and 3OO-A of the Constitr,rtion of lndia ar d cor)sequently may direct the Respondent No.4 to initiate Iand acquisition pror eedinlls in the event the Petitioners lands or portion thereof is requrred for cTeattt g a Road on the said lands, rn the interest of justtce. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 4472LOF 2017) Pntition uncier Section 151 CPC praying that in the ;r'cunrstanccs stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petil.ion the Hrgh OoLtrt nray be pleased direct the Respondent No 4 not to interfere with the possess on of the Petitioner No.1's Land admeasuring Ac 0-38.5 guntas covered r.nder Sy.No 1171lA situated at Ramayarnpr:t Village and IVandal, lr.4edak Distrir;t anrl the Petitioner No.2's Land admeasunnq Ac.0-38.5 guntas covered L.nCer Sy.No.117.1 /A situated at Ramayampet Village and Mandal, l\ledak Distrrr;t iotally admeasuring Ac.1-37 guntas, rn the interest of justice pending disposal of the writ petitron. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the oircunrstances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition. the High Cou -t may be pleased to permit the petitioners to Teceive the Additional I\/laterial Pape's in the above writ petition in W.P.No. 36006 of 2017 in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Between: '1 . Tahera Begum, W/o.Late l\,4d.Sharfuddin Aged abcut 53 years, Occ Household, R/o. Ramayampet, ltrledak District 2 lr4ohd.Khala lvlohruddin, S/o.Gulam [\4ohiuddin, Aged rtrout 62 years, Occ Business, R/o. Ramayampet, fVledak District AND 1 The State of Telangana, rep. by its Prrncipal Secretary, Ilevenue Department, .PETITIONERS Secretariat, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Ir/edak District- The District Panchayat Officer, Medak District. The Executive Officer, Grampanchayat, Ramayampet \,'jllagr: and Mandal, [\4ed a k District 2 3 4

5. Ramayanpet Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Havrng its office at Ramayanpet, tt/edak District.

6. Medak Municipalrty, rep. by its Commissioner, having office near old Bus Stand, N4edak-5021'1 0. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated rn the affidavrt filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as respondent No 6 in the above W.P.No.36006 of 2017 and also in all Writ Miscellaneous Petitions in the said Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. KIRANMAYEE, REP. FOR SMT VEDULA CHITRALEKHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOFI PANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI G.NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR ZPP Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MCPL The Court made the following: ORDER I I I i [I()\'BLI' SIlI .II.]STI( II L.,\XIVII NARAYANA 1t-ISIII.]T-t\' \\1r'it Pctition \o.i600(r of 2017 OIIDER: 'l his Writ I)ctition is lllcci seeking to isstrc a rvrit of .\'ltirttlartrrr.s decl.rlirrg thc uction ol'r'esponder-rt No.4 in tr-r ing to [ar a r()a(l in thc petitioncrs' land adnrcasuring Ac.0.3ti.: :.unlrrs e:rcl.r cor cred unclcr Sr'.No.I l7 l/,\. siLuatcd at Rarnayarlprt \rilulse and Nllnclrrl. N4cdak I)istrict (lrcreinalicl rclerred to as 'strt,tect llnds'). as ill.--ual arrd urbitrarv ancl violative of Articles 1,1. I I ancl 300-i\ ot'('onstitution o l' India.

2. Heard lt ls. Iiira rr n-ra1,cc, lcarncd counscl reprcsL'nting Snrt Vcclulr ('hitlalelihrr, lealnccl counsel-ou-r'ce ,rltl .irl l"ire pe titionc'r's. ancl S r-i I'utta Klishna I{cdd1,. lealned Sten I u!r L'olrnse I lor r.'sponricut No.5 i. It is the case ol thc pc'titior-rcrs that they arc ori ncrs ol thc sub.icct lands rtnri rverc ulso issucd pattadar passbo,rks arrcl title deeds: that thc1, have been in continuous and r.ur inlclruptecl possession of thc subject lirr-rds; and that the sulr-]e ct lands are abutting r.t.titin road lcadin-e lronr lll,derabad to RarnavumLrct. Whilc thc matter stood tltLts. rcspondenl No.4, r.vithouL n\ u(,tice or 2 t.i'A. J ll'P.)\o.-t6t)06 0f 2(ll /- \ procccdings, carnc to thc subjec[ lands of the petitioner.s, on

25.10.201 7 ancl tried to lay road. Agtri* ed br thc said action, rhc prcscnt Writ I)e tition is ll lccl

4. Learnecl counsel filr petitioncrs sr-rbrnittccl that respondc'nt No.4 cannot lav road t the lancls belonging to thc petitioners rv'ithuut acquiring the sarne and the rcspondents lrave to tbllou, duc ploccss utrdo larv if thc sub.jcct lands ol tl-re pctitioucrs ar.c' required lbr lav ins roacl

5. l-earncd Standing Counsel for lespondcnt No.5, bl r'c f'cr-rinq to coun ter-atll davit filcd by responclent No..l, sr-rbrnittecl that a kutcha road is passing through the sub.jcct lands of the pctitioncrs; ancl that petitionel's, in fact, themsclvcs havc tlied to ler,'el up the land in [he month of October, 201 7, q,hich rvas ob.lcctcd and obstructed by villagers nurnbering about 200 orr the ground that thc;- ,ui'ele using walk u,ay through thc sub.ject lands lol the' last l0 years to takc their cattle lor grazing and if thc subjcct lands ar.e lcvcllcd and thc walk rvay is disn-rantlcd, it rvould bc inconvenient fbr thcur. t{c furthcr subrnitted that thc Writ Petition has been filed by suppressing the true facts and b1' making false allegations against respondcnts. Learned Standing Counsel has drarvn the ) Lr\ l' I lt'l'. \o.36ttt)6 tt )01 7 attention of thrs ('oulr to para J ol'rl-rc c()r-urter-atll (lil v it irlccl b1 lesponclcrrt No.l. u,hcrein it is categoricnlly' stated tlrrt tcspotrdcnI No.-1 lras not Lirl(cn lury sort o1- deve lopn tc'rttal acti\ iries irt tlic sub-iect lrrncls ,rl tlrc pctitiorrcrs rncl pluyccl to disrriss tit'-- \\ li1 Petition

6. ( onsiclerirr!. th.' submissions Llaclc b1, leamcd coLrnscl lirr petitioner-:j ancl leulnccl Standing CoLurscl lirl responr{L-'r.it No.-i ancl the r\ e r rt)ents r,rrtlc in |nra-J ol- the counter-allrcL:r it fiied b} responclcnL \o.i that LcsporrrlcnLs har c not takcn tqr any der,.'lopui,-'ntel e.:tir itics in thc :Lrbjcct lanrls olthc- pcLitionci's. this Writ Pctition is disl-;osccl of Iclving it opcn to the t'e jpondents to lbllorr clue pr()ccss rrnclcr lau. in casc. they intenrl 1o Iav rrrlcl thlough tlrc sLrble ct lauds o1'tlrc i)e titioners

7. \{isct'llane otrs l)ctitions pending. il'arry, shall stirnd closr-rl No costs o ,TRUE COPY// SD/. P.PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR secrr#orrrcen l'

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretarial, Hyclerabad. 2. The District Collector, l\,4edak District. 3. The District Panchayat Offrcer, Medak District 4. The Executive Officer, Grampanchayat, Ramayampet \/illage and lt4andal, lrleda k District

5. The Commissioner, Ramayanpet tr,4unicipality, H: ving its office at Ramayanpet. lt,4edak District.

6. The Commissio'rer, It4edak lr,4unicipaiity, having office near old Bus Stand, Medak-502110.

7. One CC to Sl\4T VEDULA CHITRALEhIHA, Advocate [OPL.lC] 8. One CC to SRI G.NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR ZPP [C,PUC] ,__--at--,t4 -.i:-. / 9 One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR IMCPL [OPUC] 10.Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

11.Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

12.Two CD Copies BSR BS c+- HIGH COURT DATED: 1dAgl2025 I ORDER WP.No.36006 of 2017 .1-> A r(: : i] tCI ?025 ,, .aa t- i.. -i '... DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS g o

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments