High Court · 2025

5. Sri Godasu Kistaiah @ Krishna' aqed about 55 years' ' 6.J;;"lture R/ o 642 I 1'Koisara t{'l'ulltlgf Ibrahimpatnam V"taa'-fiungu R"eday Oittrict - 501 510' 6 Godasu lanardhan S/o Ramaiah' " i."i ,t .", 50 years' occ Agriculrure' n7" o-+Zl f ,f<cl"gara Kalan Village i;1.It.i-:f#;'turu"ai' n*g' freddv District - sols10 En i #.-q<r14:lB II

7. Godasu Venkatesh S/o Ranraiah, Aged about 49 years,()cc.Agriculturc R/ o 642/ l,Kongara Kalan Village Ibrairimpatnam Mandal, Iianga Reddv District- 501 j 0 tl. Sri Godasu Bhaskar S/o [-atc Narasimha, Aged abrlut 53 1't'ars, Occ. I)riyate R/o H.No.6-,12/ l, Kong.rra Kalan Village, Ibrahirnpatnam N'lanclal, RIi t)ist. TS - 501510

9. Sri Kaki Laxmaiah Mudiral S/o Latc Kaki Narsimh; , Aged about 61 years, A6Ticulture R/o H.No.4-71, Kongarakalan Viltage, Ibrahimpalnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 50 I 510 10 .Sri Kaki Darshan S/o Late Kaki Narstmha, Aged about 31 yc;irs, Occ. Agriculture Rl o 4-72, Kongarakalan Village, Ibrahinlpatnanr i!1. r clal, Ranga Reddy Diskict, Telangana State - 501510

11.Sri Kaki Sudhakar lvluclhiraj S/o latc Kaki Narsirnha. Aged about 50 ycars, Occ. Agricultulc R/o 1-55, Kongarakalan Village, IbrahimPatnam Ivli I dal, Ranga Recldy Dishict, Telangana State - 501510

12.Sri Kaki Ramulu S/o Late Kaki Narasirnha, Aged about 74years, Occ. Agriculturc . R/o B-3-a9/63, (lharrinaka Backsiclc, Old Charrinaka, Telangana State - 500 053

13.Sri Kola Valya S/o late Herna Nayak Aged about 75 ycars, Occ. Agricultural R/o H. No.8-112, Kongara Kalan (v), Ibrahimpatnam (M), RR Disrrict - 501510

14.Sri K.Laxman @ I-axman Naik S/o Late Hema Naik Aged about 70 years, Occ. Agricultural R/o H.No.8-116, Kongara Kalan (V), Ibrahimpatnam (M), RR District - 501510

15.Sri Kola Swainy 5/oLate Hema Naik Aged about 64 iears. Occ. Agricultural R/o H.No.8-115, Kongara Kalan (V), Ibrahimpatnam (t I), RR District - 501510

15.Sri KolaShankar S/o Late Hema Naik; a gg_{"qp. qu ! _6-}-yearq, Occ, : Rlo [!:No. 8-113, Kongaia Ibraliitipatnain (M); RR.Dis Asr!-gg Kdlari 101':, .. -

17.Sri KotaXrishna Slo Late Hema Niik' Aged lbout 54 years, Occ. Agriculhiral R/o H.No. 8-113, Kongara Katan (V), lbrahimpatnarn (M), RR Disfiictr.: 501510

18.Sri KakiNarayana S/o [-ate Ramaiah, aged about 65, Occ. Agricultur e R/ o 3-7 , Kongardkhlan Village, lbrahimpatnam Manda[, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510

19.Sri Kaki Chakrapani S/o Late Ramaiah, Aged about 60, Occ. Agriculture . - R/ o Kongarakalan Village, lbrahi mpatnam Manda l, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510

20.Sri Kaki Ganesh S/o Late RamaiatL Aged about 53, Occ.Agriculture R/ o 6-15, Kongarakalan Village. Ibrahimpabram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State - 501510

21.Sri Jatoth Chansiram S/o Late Parsiya, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Agricultural, R/ o,H.No.2-65, Bodakonda village, Mahchal mandal, Ranga Reddy Dishict - 501 508

22.Sri Jatoth Valya S/ o late Bojya, Aged about 81 years, Occ. Agriculture R/o H.No.2-60, Bodakonda Village, Manchal mandaf Ranga Reddy District - 501508

23.Sri Jatoth Laxma S/o t ate Bojya, Aged about 85 years, Occ. Agricultural, R/o H.No.2{3, Bodakonda Village, Manchal mandal, RR Dist. TS - 501508

24.Sri fatoth Mothya @ Mothiram S/o I-ate Vasuram Aged about 49 years, Occ. Agricultural, R/ o H.No.2-139, Bodakonda Village, Manchal mandal, RR Dist. TS - 501508 l ..;:<:|,':j'-tE:,i- : I I I I I -l-: i

25.Sri Jatoth l-Iariya @/ o Late Vasuram Aged about 52 years, Occ, Agricultural R/o H.No.2-55, Bodakonda Vitlage, Manchal rnandal, RR Dist, TS - 501508

26. Smt.Lata Ilai W/o l-atc Lajapat Iiai, aged 75 years, Occ. Houst:wife, R/o. Kongara Kalan Village lbrahimpatrr;rm Mandal, llarrga Recldy I)istrict - :,( 1 510 27- Sri Amit tta i S/o Latc Lajapat tlai, aged 46 years, Occ. servicc R/o. Konllara Kalan Village lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga.Reddy District- li(,. 510

28. Sri Gancsh Rai S/o Latc (-iiridhar [)as, aged 79 years, Occ. Retd R/o. Kongara Kalan Village Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-50 . )10

29. Smt.Sharnrila Shah D/o Cancsh Rai W/o Pranay Kumar, aged 50 y(,ar ; Occ. housewife, R/o. Kongara Kalan Village Ibrahimp.rtn:rm Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 5(r. 510 .. Respondents Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of ln I a praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, th* High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularl ,one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, decraring the action of the 3rd responder I in issuing impugned orders i issuance of u/s 3BE certificates vide File Nos. L/7 )4tzozo, Lt7gst2ozo, u7961202o dated 08.05.2020, Lt7g7t2o20 dated.29.06.iir 20 and Lt8}4t2o2o dated 02.06.2020 and Bl1\73l2o21 in favour of Respondent \o.5 to 25 in respect of Agricultural tands in Sy No. 274 (Ac.10.07 gts), Sy No. j75 (Ac.9.39 gts), Sy No. 276 (Ac.12.26 gts), Sy No.2Tt (Ac.6.13gts), Sy No. 2,8 (Ac.10.12 gts), Sy No. 279 (Ac.9.31 gts), Sy No. 280 (Ac.10.37 gts), Sy No. 28.r iAc.3.04 gts), Sy No. 282 (Ac.6.24 gts) and Sy No. 283 (Ac.14.OT gts) totat an o tent of Ac.94.00 grs situated at Kongara Karan (V), rbrahimpatnam Mandar, Ran3 r Reddy District with reference under Section 3BE of Tenancy Act by reviving ther _p1 Common Order vide cc Nos.3373/t/ 7s, 33t4ilfis and 3396/l/75 dated ii .01.1976. This was attempted by not following due process of law as contain l i in section 3gE of HTAL Act and as contemprated under the said act and with.r t issuing mandatory Notice to the petitioners is bad in law and highly illegal arb t ary and against the principles of natural justice and also violating the provisions ( f Articles 14, 19, 21 I and 300A of constitution of lndia and by setting aside impugned orders dated 29.06.2020,29'06.2020anddt2.06.2020andtoupdatetheLandRecordswith reference to the cc No 3374/1/ 75 and cc No.3396/l/ 75 vide common order dated 31 .01 .1976 also consequently directing the respondent not to interfere of the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in the interest of justice. |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the lmpugned Orders and U/s 38E Certificates vide File File Nos. File Nos. L/79412020, Ll 7951 2020, L179612020 dated 08.05.2020, Ll 79712020 dated

29.06.2020 and L188412020 dated 0206.2020 & 81187312021, issued by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : SRI L.RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 29 : - The Court made the following ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF l ELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.V[)] 'UGOPAL WRIT L-9TITION No.4O371 of 2o2) Dated; 31.12.2025 Between: Smt. Niveditha represented by GPA bt I ler Sri Gondi Laxmanna Srinivasa Reddy .. Petitione r The State ofTelangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary and tri:-rty eight others And .RDER lesPouder-rts This Writ Petition is filed under Article ?,'t t of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- ' "... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction mrrr-r one in the trature of Writ ol Mandamus, ,l rcspondent in issr.tir'5 action of the 3'd orders/issuance of U/ s 38E Certific:rtr.'s Nos.L1794/2O2O, L/79112O2O, L17961 .l 08.05 2020, L1797 l2o2o dated '29 c\( . L/884 l2O2o 02.06.2O2O and B/ L87312021 in favour o1 No.5 to 25 in respect of Agricultural lands I (Ac.10.07 gts), Sy No.275 (Ac.9.39) gLs, (Ac.12.26 gts), Sy No.277 (Ac.6.13gts). (Ac.10.12 gts), Sy No.279 (Ac. 9.31 gts) (Ac. 10. 37 gts), Sy No.281 (Ac.3.04 gtsl (Ac.6.24 gts) and Sy No. 283 (Ac.l4.OT :1 extent of Ac.94.0O gts situated at Kongar: lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Redd-v" I) reference under Section 38E of Tenancy Act the LRT Common Order vide CC No ; 337411175 and 3396/1175 dated 31.01.197 attempted by not follou.ing due proces-t contained in Section 38E ol HTAL I \ contemplated under the said act and u'it r mandatory Notice to the petitioners is baci highly illegal arbitrar v- and agair-rst the ) oarl.icularly claring the impugned vide File t2O dated ),O2O and ?espondent Sy No.274 Sy No.276 Sy No.278 Sy No.28O Sy No.282 s) total an Kalan (V), strict with by reviving 33731r l7s, i This was of law as t and as rut issuing in lau' and inciples of k I I 2 natural justice and also violating the provisions of Articles L4, 19, 2l and 3OOA of ConstiLution of India and by setting aside impugned orders dated 08.05.2020, 09.05.2020 and 02.06.2020 and to upchfe the Land Records rvith refe rencc to the CC No.3ll74/ 1/ 75 and CC No.3396i l/ 75 vicic Common Order dated 31.O1.1976 also consequentll' clirecting thc rcspondent ncL Lo irrr;.'ere ol the pczrcclul possession and enjoyment of the petitic,ners in the interest oljustice and to pass..." 2 Heard Mr.Katika Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner ald Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue representing learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing lor respondent Nos.l to 4. Perused the record

3. Learned coLrnsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not put lo arry nolice before passing the impugned orders/issuance of Certificates under Section 38E vide File Nos.L/794/2O2O, L/79512020, Ll796l2O2O dated 08.05.2020, Ll797l2O2O dated 29.06.2020 and L1884/2O2O dated 02.06.2O2O andBl1873l2021 in favour of Respondent No.5 to 25 in respect of p.agricultural lands admeasuring Ac. 10.07 gts in Sy.No.274, Ac.9.39 gts in Sy.No.275, Ac.12.26 gts in Sy.No.276, Ac.6.13 gts in Sy.No.277, Ac.10.12 gts in Sy.No.278, Ac. 9.31 gts in Sy.No.279, Ac.1O.37 gts in Sy.No.28O,, Ac.3.04 gts- in J Sy.No.281, Ac.6.24 gts 1n Sy.No.282 and . ,c. f i.07 gts in Sl'.No. 283 totaliy admeasuring Ac.94.O(t lts sltuated at I{ongarzr Kalan Viiiage, Ibrahimpatnam ilanrial, Rarga Re,Jcly District

4. Lcarncd Assistzrnt Government Plear,r lbr Revenue contends that if at all the petitioners are rt lgrieved by the impugnecl orders, they ought to have fiied ;i r appeal before the appropriate forum, rather than approa,r )ing this Court by filing the instant writ petition. Thercli r e, he seeks to dismiss this writ petition.

5. Having regard to the submissions of r rth the learned cciunsel and on perusal of the material availai-1 : orL record, this Court is of the opinion that petitioners, withr.,rr exhausting the remedy avarlable to them, have approached tl-i ; Court by filing the instant u'rit petition. Therefore, this Courr i; nor inc:lined to entertain the Writ Petition, at this stage, and 'l e same is liable to be dismissed. However, the petitioners a,re s -anted liberty to rvork out the remedies as available under lau' 4 i:1 6 Accordingly, this Writ petition is clismissed. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellareous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ petition shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/-M. NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGI TRAR SECTION FICER Hyderabad. [OUT] '1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at 2. One CC to SRI KATIKA RAVINDER REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl 3. Two CD Copies To SA BS I I HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212025 -\'11 \ i_i 0 t '^rii} r\ ..'.\ I I ., .a\../ -,,,':'.../ :- - a-'- ORDER WP.No.40371 ot 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS, . I I t b e\'v