High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the c,rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order/ direction more particularly one! in the nature of Writ of ltlandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondent no 2 and 3 considering the petitioners representation dated 2610812025, to take action regarding the illegal and unauthorised construction made by the Respondent no.4, in the premises bearing premises no 13-63, plot bearing no 1 18, in survey no 71311 , At Yadav Nagar, It4alkajgiri, Medchal Malkajgiri District who is running a commercial activities and also encroached the 5 feet road by that illegal construction along with washrooms because of which the petitioners are suffeflng from sanitation and lack of ventilation, cotr equently direct the respondent 2 and 3 to consider petitioner's representation t ated 2610812025 and to follow their own proceedings bearing no.3436/ClR-! 3/Sec-bad z/GHMC, Dated 1o/1 112025 and to take necessary action against 1re Respondent no 4 who made the illegal construction, in the premises bearitt premises no 13-63. plot bearing no.11B, in survey no 71311, At Yadav Na-qir l\,4alkajgiri, Medchal IMalkajgiri District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the : :ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High c(,r rt may be pleased to direct the Respondent no 2 and 3 to consider petitioneri representation dated 26tO812O25 and to follow their own proceedings bearing no 1436/ClR-28/Sec-bad Z/GHlVC, Dated 1Ot11l2O?5 and to take necessarl/ action against the Respondent no.4 who made the illegal construction, in he premises bearing premises no.13-63, plot bearing no.'1 '1 B, in survey no 71il1, At Yadav Nagar, tvlalkajgiri, tr,4edchal lr/alkajgiri District pending disposal : the above said writ petitron. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ALLAM SRIKANTH YADA! Counsel for th ent No.1: GP FOR MCP L ADMN ( RBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI G.MADHUSUtI IAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER ,.;,:,..:' -:{q*-.aFpa,t -. ??. / HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOT]RABLE SRI JTJSTICE B. VIJAYSEN ITE,DDY WRIT PETITO N No.40161 OF 2025 DATE OF O RDER: 30-12-2025 Betw een: Mr. K. I)hceraj Kumar S/o. Late Mr. K Narsing Rao ... Petitioner AND -fhe State ol'l elangana Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Dcvelopnrent Dcpatture nt' Secretariat, Hyderabad, and three (3 ) others' . Rcspondents ORDER:(ORAL) 'l'his writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to declare the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not considering his representation dated 26.08.202-5 for removing the illcgal and unauthorized construction made by rcspondent No 4 in the ptopert,v bearing premises No.13-63, Plot No. llB in Survey No 7l3ll situated at Yadav Nagar, Matkajgiri, lvledchal-Matkajgiri District' as being illegal and arbitrary. )

2. Ileard Mr. Allam Slikanth Yadav, leamerl ounsel fol the petitioncr. ancl \'1r. G. Madhusudhan Rcddy, I: rrncd standing counse I fbr the GI IIVIC, appearing lbr respondent \ r s.2 rrnd 3 i. (iricvancc of the petitioner is that on his : nrplaint nrade against lespondent No.4 fbr constructing unauthor i .ed shed in the residential rpaftrrent bearing premises No.13-63. .'lot No. I ,B in Survey No 7l.i/l situated at Yadav Nagar, Malk r piri, Mcdcl.ral- \{rrlkajgiri I)istrict, show-cause xttice vide No.3.. 6/(l tR-28/Sec- bad Z/(il{N1('dated 10.11.2025 r-rnder Section 46 I ol'the Grearcr Illdelabad Municipal Corporation Act 1955 (GF'i 4C Act) \\ AS issued lo rcspondent No.4 directing hcr to submit c< cuments along rrirh sanctioncd plan if any lor verillcation. Hower r r, so f-ar action has not bccn takcn

1. [.cerrncd standing counsel lirl the GHM(] .ubnritted rhat appropriate action will be taken pursuant to 1t< notice dated l0.l 1.2025 and orders will be passed in accordance vrth law

5. Rc'corcling the aforesaid subrnission of Iez rrcd standing counsel lirr the GHMC, the writ petition is dispos: I o1. direr:ting 4lW ,'y --r respondent No.2 to conduct enquiry, pursuant to the noticc dated

10.11.2025, and pass orders, by altbrding opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner arld respondent No 4. within a period ol tirur (4) rvceks fl'otn the date of receipt of a copy ol this order'

6. As this order is passed without entering int<l rncrits of thc case, ttotice to rcspondent No'4 is dispensed with l I respondet'rt No.4 is in anvrvay aggrieved by this otder' shc is at libcrty to approach this Court seeking modification of this order' -l'here shall be no older .ls to costs Asa scquel thereto, miscellaneous applications' il' any ' pending in the rvrit petition stand closed' To, //TRUE COPY// SO/- M.NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,..e SECTION OFFICER l.ThePrincipalsecretary,MunicipalAdministrationDepartment'Secretariat Hyderabad, State of Telangana

2. The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad tvlunicipal CorPoration, Malka.igiri tr/unicipal Corporation Circle- 28, MAlkajgiri, Medchal- Malkajgiri, Hyderabad. - 3'TheAssistantCityPlanner,GreaterHyderabadMunicipalCorporation,Circle- 28, Malkaigiri Medchal- Malkajgiri, Hyderabad'

4. One CC to SRI ALLAM SRIKANTH YADAV, Advocate IOPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADN'IN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD CoPies BSR TKS -.lJl- .1:-r,.+-,.=,L..--+-'- -- -- "'=- "- HIGH COURT DATED: 3011212025 ORDER WP.No.40161 of 2025 -) c() ( oR THE S Tt 2 ( I ll 5 |1t,F 21,]26 I Spe DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS {"\)'!