High Court · 2025

Judgment

1. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat, Hldera6ad. ...pentloruen

2. The District Collector, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. 4. The Tahsildar, Nalgonda Mandal, Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of the 4th respondent in not regularizing the land to an extent Ac.1.1B cents in Sy. No. 858 situated in Seshamma Gudem Village, Nalgonda Revenue Mandal, Nalgonda District vide application bearing TTROS0222003405288, dt.O4.11 .2020 and Bhu Bharathi online application receipt No.110152, dated 11-06-2025 in accordance with GO.Ms.No.1 12, Revenue (Assignment-'l ) Department, dt. 12l1Ol2O2O is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to regularize the, Sada Bainama Application No. TTROSO2220O34O52BB dt.04111l2O2O and Bhu Bharathi online application receipt No.1'10152, dated 1110612025 filed by the petitioner with regard to the land in Sy.No.858, admeasuring Ac.'l .18 guntas situated at Seshamma Gurlem Village, Nalgonda Revenue Mandal, Nalgonda District. 10 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of Sada Bainama dated 10.07.2009 pursuant to the application bearing TTROS0222003405288, dt.O4.'11.2020 and Bhu Bharathi online application receipt No.110152, datr:d 1 1-06-2025 in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.V.RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR ASSIGNMENT The Court mader the following: ORDER HIGH COI'RT FOR THE STATE OF TELAI{GANA AT IIYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.4OO55 of 2O25 DATE OF ORDER: 3O.!2.2ol25 iEISTMTEME Kodadala Jayamma AND The State of A.P., Rep. by its Prl.Secretary and 3 others : ORDER: ... Petitioner ... Respondents This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not regularizing the land to an extent of Ac.1.18 guntas in Survey No.858, situated in Seshamrria Gudem Village, Nalgonda Revenue Mandal, Nalgonda District (for short 'subject landJ, despite the application bearing petitioner having No.TTROSO222OO34052S8, dated 04.11 .2O2O, as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential relief.

2. Heard Sri V.V.Ramakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner a and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignments. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 3. petitioner is the owner of land admeasuring Ac.1.18 guntas in Sy.No.858, situated in Seshammagudem Village of Nalgonda Revenue Mandal of Nalgonda District having purchased the same under Sada \r ) I 2 Bainama dated Lo.o7.2oo9 from one sura Pichamma, who was issued Pattadar Pa.ss Book bearing No.794 by respondent No.4.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the State has irttroduced a scheme of regularization of Sada Bainama vide G.O.Ms.No.1'L2 and that the petitioner has accordingly submitted application on 04.11 .2O2O vide application No. TTROSO222OO340S288 through Dharani Portal. Since the said application remained pending and no action was taken by respondents, the petitioner submitted another apptication dated 1I.06.2025 vide application No. 1 10 152 under Telangana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025. However, the respond,-'nts failed to consider the same. Aggrieved by the same, present writ petition is filed. 5- Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that once the petitioner meLde application for regttlarization of Sada Bainama through online portal. the respondents were obligated to consider the same and pass appropriate orders. However, in the present case, the respondents have failed to consider the said application and therefore prayed to t issue directions to the respondents to consider'the application of the petitioner ancl pass appropriate orders. 6- Learnec: Assistant Government Pleader for Assignments would submit that Lre subject land is Government land and originally it was assigned to Sr>ora Lingaiah and his name was recorded in the revenue I / I I \ I 7 t records up to the year 2OO4-2OO5. Subsequently, in the year 20O9- 2010, the subject land was recorded in the name of Soora pichamma w/o.Lingaiah, who is the vendor of the petitioner. He further submits that the subject land falls in the municipal limits of i Nalgonda Municipaliqr, as such, the said Sada bainama cannot be regularized and the same was duly informed to the petitioner. However, the \ petitioner is creating law and order problem in the village. He further submitted that respondent No.4 has also issued Merno dated

12.L2.2O25 invoking Section 164 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha .the Sanhita, 2023. Therefore, the writ petition is devoid of merits and the llI same is liable to be dismissed.

7. Admittedly, the petitioner filed application dated 11.06.2025 vide application No.l 10152 under Telangana Bhu Bharathi (Record of Rights in Land) Act, 2025, seeking regularization of the subject land. On perusal of written instructions placed on record by the respondents, it appears that no orders have been passed on the application submitted by the petitioner, though it is contended that the petitioner has been informed orally that the application filed by him cannot be considered.

8. In the light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider the application of the petitioner dated

11.06.2025 vide application No.110152 and pass, appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after issuing notice and affording 4 opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as to all other affected parties. Thr:re shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscelraneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed. To, //TRUE COPYII SD/. A.V,S. PRASAD DE s OFFICER Terangane, Stiie d#;#i;t, n-y"de?a.u"Zj.strt" of relangdna.

1. The principar secretary,. _Department_.of Revenue, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar 2. The District corector, Nargonda District at Nargonda. 3. The Revenue Divisionar officer, Natgonda, Nargonda District. 4. The Tahsirrrar, Nargonda Mandat, Natgonda District. 5. ONE CC tO SRI V.V.RAMA KRISHNA, AdVOCAIC TOPUC] 6' Iyf":r"r:lti35fr"R ASSIGNMENT, Hish court for the state or rerangana at t \

7. Two CD Coloies BSR PVL t I / ,tr HIGH COIJRT DATED: 3011212025 I I o -: i WP.No.40055 of 2025 1 HE SIA !.1. ( O() 71 2 3 JAll 2026 :r. I i DISPOSIN OF THE WRIT PETITION :) G c o s o