I\4r. Shaik Abdul Raheem @ Bhai Miya v. The Commissioner of Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-TS, The Deputy Commissioner of Police, South
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 s. 151
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. ' here shail be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall : tand closed. //TRUE COPY' ^s AI,\ ) (.eueverur swAMy $Yerur REGISfRAR --" -\ To, 1 2 3 4 $crroru oFFrcER One CC…
Judgment
Cause title
7. lvlr. Srinivas Eslavath, Sub Inspector of Police, Women Police Station Charminar, Ghansi Bazar, Charminar, Hyderabad
8. Smt. Habeeba Fathima, W/o. Mohd. Mansoor, Aged about 19 years, Occ Housewife, Rfo.H.No.'1 1-2-96611, Flat No.G2, Saber Apartment, Bazar Ghat. Nampally Hyderabad I I ! I l -7 ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ln, ia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, ti t High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particul:rr y one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for records in FIR No.10B of 1,.1 17 of pS Charminar, Hyderabad dt.19-07-2017 and quash the same again; the Writ petitioners heiein in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 46811 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in th: circumstances stated in the affldavit filed in support of the petition, the High C,r rrt may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in FIR No.10B of 2C17 of pS Charminar, Hyderabad dl. 19.O7.2017 before the Respondent No.4 ir the interest of justice pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAZIR AHMED KHAN luor RESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI M.A.MUJEEB The Cpurt made the following: ORDER ,al-.ry 1 ! THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.37 70,0 0F 20t7
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of Indizr seeking the following relief/ s:- '...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one rn the nature of Writ ol Certiorari to call for records in FIR No 1O8 ol 2017 of PS Charminar, Hyderabad dt 19-07 2017 and quash the same against the Writ Fetitioners herein in the interest of justice.....'
None appears on behaif of the petitioners'
Heard Iearned Assistdnt Governitrent Pieader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 5.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that, in connection with Crime No. 108 of 2017, after due investigation, a charge sheet has been hled, and the case has been taken on lile as C.C. No. 464 of 2Ol8 on the frle of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Hence, prays that the writ petil ion be dismissed.
I have perused the material placed on record'
Having considered the prayer of the petitioners for quashment of the crime proceedings, and in view of the fact that the charge sheet has already been hled ald the case has been numbered as a Calendar Case. This circumstance clearly I \ I 2 indicates that [he investigating agency has i rmpleted the invcstigertion and placecl material before the Cor I sufhcient to u'arrant trial and it is evident that the jurisdictrc r al trial Court has lound a prima facie casc to proceed further.
In light of the above position, this Court hnds r-ro ground to interfere at this stage in exercise of its writ jurisdi,-- ion. However, the petitioners libr:rty is szrved to avaii approF r ate remedies available under law before the trial Court, if so advir ed.
Operative part
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. ' here shail be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall : tand closed. //TRUE COPY' ^s AI,\ ) (.eueverur swAMy $Yerur REGISfRAR --" -\ To, 1 2 3 4 $crroru oFFrcER One CC to SRt NAZTR AHMED KHAN, Advocate [OpU One CC to SRI N/ A [\,4UJEEB, Advocate [OpUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the I tate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies BSR BS (?LL HIGH COURT DATED: 0911012025 ORDER WP.No.37700 of 2017 ) {l-it S14 ( O \)o(J ? JAN 2026 t ! c ! spnici \:" -z' '::=--'-r1-- DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS {L \il\Lh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.