The High Court · 2025

Sri Babu Rao S/o not known, Occ Sub-lnspector of Police, Police Station, Dharmaram, Peddapalli District. Kalva Anusha W/o late Tirupathi, Occ Cooli, R/o Dharmaram Village and Mandal, Peddapalli District.

8. Kalva Prasad S/o Peddaiah, Occ Student, R:/o Dharmaram Vg., and Mandal, Peddapalli District.

9. Mahesh S/o not known, Occ Running Chicken Centre, at Kothapalli village, Dharmaram Mandal, Peddapalli District.

10. Nara Brahmaiah S/o Chinna Mallaiah, ZPTC, Dharmaram, Rl/o Dharmaram village and Mandal, Peddapalli District. 1 1 . Nara Prabhakar S/o Chinna Mallaiah, MPTC, Dharmaram, Rl/o Dharmaram village and Mandal, Peddapalli District. ! I I I i I i i i

12. Nara Premsagar S/o Ravi, Ward Member of 13th Ward, Grampanchayat Dharmaram, Rio Dharmaram village and Mandal, Peddapalli District.

13. Pusukuri Jithender Rao s/o Ramchander Rao, Occ Agrculture, fuo Dharmaram village and lvlandal, Peddapalli Diskict. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus (a) to direct the Respondent No. 5 herein i.e. Sub-lnspector of Police, Police Station, Dharmaram who was made as party by name as Respondent No.6 not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to compel them to comply with the agreement dated 21-9-2017 which was obtained forcibly under duress which was scribed by one Sri Rajesh, Constable in the Police Station, Dharmaram, Peddapalli District to register the land an extent of 0- 03 guntas in Sy. No. 292lAA situated at Dharmaram village and tr,4andal in the name of children of deceased Tirupathi and also to pay the balance amount of Rs. 70,0001 to the Respondent No.7 at the instance of Respondents 8 to 13 (b) Declare the action of the Respondent No. 5 herein i.e. Sub-lnspector of Police, Police Station, Dharmaram who was made as party by name as Respondent No.6 in calling the petitioners to the police station and compelling them to comply with the agreement daled 21-9-2O17 which was obtained forcibly under duress which was scribed by one Sri Ra.lesh, Police Constable in the Police Station, Dharmaram, Peddapalli District to register the land an extent of 0- 03 guntas in Sy. No.292lAA situated at Dharmaram village and Mandal in the name of children of deceased Tirupathi and also to pay the balance amount of Rs. 70,0001 to the Respondent No.7 at the instance of Respondents g to 13 otherwise the petitioners would implicate in the false criminal cases as illegal, arbitrary, abuse of officiar power and contrary to the provisions of code of Criminal Procedure Code. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(wP MP. NO:4287I OF 20171 Petition under Section 'r 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondent No. 5 herein i.e. Sub-lnspector of police, police station, Dharmaram who was made as party by name as Respondent No. 6 not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to compel them to comply with the agreement dated 21-9-2017 which was obtained forcibly under duress which was scribed by one Sri Rajesh, Police Constable in the Police Station, Dharmaram, Peddapalli District to register the land an extent of 0-03 guntas in Sy. No. 292lAA situated at Dharmaram Village and fvlandal in the name of children of deceased Tirupathi and also to pay the balance amont of Rs. 70,000- to the Respondent No- 7 at the instance of Respondents 8 to 13; pending dispsoal of the above wrrit petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V. RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents No't To 5: SRI M. SRINIVAS REDDY AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No 6 To '13:-- The Court made the following: ORDER THE HONOURABLI SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT PETITION No.34489 OF 2017 ORDER: I This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:- "...to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus (a) to direct the Respondent No. 5 herein i.e. Sub-lnspector of Police, Police Station, Dharmaram who was made as party by narne as Respondent No.6 not to call the petitioners to the police station and not to compel them to comply with the agreement dated 27-9-2Q17 which was obtained forcibly under duress which was scribed by one Sri Rajesh, Constable in the Police Station, Dharmaram, Peddapalli District to register the larld an extent of O-03 guntas in Sy. No. 292lAA situated at Dharmaram village and Mandal in the namc of children of deceased Tirupathi and a.lso to pay the balarce anount of Rs. 70,000/- to the Respondent No.7 at the instance of Respondents 8 to 13 (b) Declare the action of the Respondent No. 5 herein i.e. Sub-Inspector of Police, Police Station, Dharmararn who was made as party by name as Respondent No.6 in calling the petitioners to the police station and conrpelling ttrem to comply with the agreement daLed 2l-9-2O17 rvhich was obtained forcibly under duress which was scribed by one Sri Rajesh, Police Constable in ttre Police Station, Dharmaram, Peddapalli District to register the lard an extent of O-03 guntas in Sy. No. 292lAA situated at Dharrnaram village and Mandal in ttre narne of children of deceased Tirupathi and also to pay the bala-nce arnount of Rs. 70,OOO/- to the Respondent No.7 at the instance of Respondents 8 to 13 otherwise the petitioners would implicate in the false criminal cases as illegal, arbitrary, abuse of officia1 power and contnary to the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure Code..." I { (

2. Heard Mr.V.Ravi Kiran Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.l to 5.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause of action in the present writ petition no longer survives for a 2 \ adjudication and, ttrerefore, seeks dismissal of the writ petiLion as infructuous.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleadcr raises no objection to the said submission.

5. Recording the submissions of both learned counsel, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. \ \ //TRUE COPY// SD/- M. OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSISTANT REGISTRAR6 SECTION OFFICER To, '1. OneCCto SRt. VRAVT KTRAN RAOAdvocare[OpUC] ' Iv.%P"?".lir35fo* HoME ,Hish court for the State of retansana at 3. Two CD Copies DAN € HIGH COURT DATED:1611012025 ORDER WP.No.34489 of 2017 'i r1i ii i,,i, a O 0 i ttB 2!20 \ * Or -!,. I I I DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS (4,' N. cV-