Sri.Vemula Venkatesh, S/o v. Gandaiah,, Occ Business, Rlo. H.No

1. Sri.Vemula Venkatesh, S/o. V. Gandaiah,, Occ Business, Rlo. H.No.3-5- 14214and5. Near Pillar No.164, Attapur Village, GHMC, Rajen{raNqgqlCiqcle, RangareddyDistrict, T.S, Pan.No. ABVPV2909F,(C_e|| N_o. 91 9391033.3.1.9). - 2. Sri.PY.Chandrashekar Reddy, S/o.P.Vittal Reddy,, Occ Businqql_ryo.H.N0.1- 50, Kokapet, CBIT, Hyderabad, T.S.- PANoNooAFNPPG6TOFl,(Cell No 9866662448) ...PETtrtoNERS AND - State. -State. Revenue, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad,

1. The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary,, Department of Z. tfre Stat6 of Tel5ngana, Rep., by iti Principal Secretary,, Department of 3. The District Clollector, tvlahabubdnagar District, Mahabubnagar. Telangana 4. The Joint :Collector, ttlahabubnagar District. Mahabubnagar., Telangana 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, State. 6. The superintendent of police, Mehaboob nagarDistrict,, Mehaboobnagar, -. . :,-..' 7. The Deputy superintendent of Poke, Mehaboob nagarDistricl, , 8. The Sub lnsp6ctbr of police ,Police station Rajapur,, tt/ehaboobnagar District, 9. V. Naiayana S/o not known,, Occ Retd. DSP., R/o House No. 3-5- 10.N. Madhusud'an S/o Gopalaswatiy,, OciRetd., Employee, Fl/o FL No.20- 1 1 19 I 1 lgl1 /A, Raj Mohalla, Kachiguda, Hyderaba d-27 - State of Telangana. Mehaboobnagar, State of Telangana. Telangana state, 11413, Dayanandanagai, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad -Mahaboobnagar

11.The T'ahsiidar, Rajapilr Mandal, District,, Telangana State. ' .- ---.;:RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction more so particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondent No 5 in issuing prohibitory proceedings in proceedings No. Lr. No. B/ROR/1 43712017 andlr. No. .:: .: ri: i.... ..::r. B/ROR/143812017 under section 145 of Cr.P.C. proceedings by ordering to promulgate to initiate with immediate effect in respect of lands in Sy. No. 50 to an extent of Ac 9-00 Gts., situated within the limits of Rajapur Village and Mandal until finalization of the ROR case by the Tahsildar (Respondent No. 11), Rajapur is directed to taken over the possession and kept under Govt, Custody of above lands imme<iiately, as illegal and uncalled for is without jurisdiction, without notice-and vrithout hearing the petitioners and trying to evict them from the possession of agricultural lands in survey nos. 50 /AA and 50/A-AA to an extent of Ac9.00 situated at Rajapur Village and Mandal , MehaboobNagar District, Telangana State by declaring it as arbitrary , illegal and contrary to the rules and by setting aside the same by directing the respondents 5 and 11 not to interfere in the above dispute which is pending before the competent civil court i.e Honble Junior Civil Judge at Jadcherla in 0.S.No 45 of 2017. l.A. NO: 1 O[:2017(WPMP. NO: 42862OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the re:;pondents 5 and ll not to interfere in the civil dispute pertaining to lands in surrrey Nos. 50/AA and 50/A/AA, to an extent of Ac.9.00 situated at Rajapur Vill:rge and Mandal, Mehaboobnagar District, Telangana State by suspending the operation of the prohibitory orders in proceedings No.Lr.No.B/F.OR/1 43712017 AND Lr.No: B/ROR/1 43812017 UNDER SECTION 145 OF Cr.P.C. issued by'the Sth respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition in ther interest of justice. Counsel for lhe Petitioner: SRI V NAGESWARA RAO ( NOT PRESENT) Counsel for lhe Respondents No 2,6 To 8: SRI M. SRINIVAS AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No 1 ,3,4,5 & 11 :GP FOR-REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No 9 & 10 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER :. ],,, . - .:]'J:! : ,. :.: ' ';Jt1;g.t-t:'.':r :. {;:rir*1}t-ii*:il 1 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICI N.TUI(ARAilIJI IIIRIT PETITION No.34474 OF 2017 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the foilowing relief/s:- "...to issue a writ or direction more so particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondent No.S in issuing prohibitory order in proceedings No. Lr.No. B/ROR/L437/2017 and Lr.No.B/ROR/L43812O17 under section 145 of Cr.P.C. proceedings by ordering to promulgate to initiate with immediate effect in respect of lands in Sy. No.50 to an extent of Acs.9-00, situated within the limits of Rajapur Village and Mandal until finalization of the ROR case by the Tahsildar (Respondent No.11), Rajapur is directed to taken over the possession and kept under Govt, Custody of above lands immediately, as illegal and uncalled for is without jurisdiction, without notice-and without hearing the petitioners and trying to evict them from the possession of agriculhrral lands in survey nos. 50/AA and 5O/A-AA to an extent of Acs.9.OO situated at R4japur Village and Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, Telangana State by declaring it as arbitrary, , illegal and contrar5r to the rules and by setting aside the same by directing the respondents 5 and 11 not to interfere in the above dispute which is pending before the competent civil court i.e Honble Junior Civil Judge at Jadcherla in O.S.No 45 of 2017..."

2. None appeared for the petitioners.

3. Heard Mr. M.Srinivas, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 8.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits that as the proceedings passed under Section 145 of Cr.PC would be in force for a period of one year and due to lapse of time and \\ t I ,,- -. i , :'ir".'.'i;;:l 2 as those orders were not renewed, the contest of the petitioner does not survive.

5. I han'e pr:rused the materials on record.

6. The pel.itioner's contention is against promulgation of prohibitorg orders under Section 145 Cr.P.C by respondent No.1.

7. Having regard to the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader and as the impugned order as on that date is not in force, nothing further survives in this matter as the contentior: had been effectively redressed. Accordingly, this writ petition is disrnissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. To, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed -,_\ SD/. M.JAWAHAR REDDY SISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER l.oneCStoSRl.V.NAGESWARARAo,Advocate[oPUC] 2. Two cos to Gp FoR HOME , High court for the State of relangana at Hydertrbad IOUTI

3. Two ccs to GP FOR REVENUE , High court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad.[OUTI

4. Two ()D CoPies DAN TKS4| z4' I I * sHE. 1 ( r Rt. 2t]2[ J{( .'-' * HIGH COURT DATED i1611012025 ORDER WP.No.34474 of 2017 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRIJCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS t{rx\*