The High Court · 2025

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction or writ particularly in the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the action of the respondents in not providing the permanent or regular compassionate appointment instead of the outsourcing job intermittently since the date of the death of the Father of the petitioner, and in not considering the representation dated 07.O1 .2025 and 21 .11.2025, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the above representations and provide permanent and regular appointment on compassionate grounds forthwith in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 07.01 .2025 and 21 .11 .2025, and provide permanent and regular appointment on compassionate grounds forthwith in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HOUSING Counsel for the Respondents Nos.2 & 3: SRI KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU, SC FOR TSHCL The Court made the following: ORDER / I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.4O186 OF 2025 DATE:30.12.2O25 Between: Chilipishetti Prabha kar AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department Housing Secreta riat Buildings, Hyderabad and two others. ... Petitione r . .. Respo ndents ORDER 'This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action oF the respondents in not providing permanent or regular compassionate appointment to the petitioner and instead engaging him on outsourcing basis intermittently since the date of the death of his father, and in not considering the representations dated 07 .01.2025 and 21.11.2025, as illegal and arbitrary

2. Heard Sri P. Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Kiran Reddy Mallarapu, learned Standing Counsel for TSHCL, appearing on behalf of the respondents. Perused the material on record. -) \

3. (a) Brief facts of the case are as follows: that the petitioner's father, late Kishtaiah, was working as an Office Subordinate with the respondent Telangana State Housing Corporation and, due to a brain stroke, he died on 11.11.2024, leaving behind the petitioner, his mother, brothers, and sister. The deceased employee leFt no property, thereby rendering the family helpless. As such, the petitioner's mother submitted a representation dated 07 .01.2025 to the General Manager (ADMN) of the Telangana State Housing Corporation, Hyderabad, requesting that her son, the petitioner, be provided employment either in place of the deceased father's post or under compassionate or any other suitable appointment, to protect and support the family. The petitioner is educationally qualified with B.A. (PGDCA) degree, aged about 29 years at the time of his father's death, belongs to BC-D caste, and submits that he is eligible For compassionate appointment (b) Though several vacancies exist in the respondent Corporation and regular recruitment notifications were issued, compassionate appointments were allegedly being provided to candidates having political influence, whereas the petitioner has been deprived of regular posting due to lack of such influence. Though the petitioner was provided compassionate posting within a few months after his father's death, he has been working intermittently and the cause of action still survives.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that several similarly placed candidates have formed a union and are collectively striving for compassionate appointment, and in pursuance thereof, a joint representation dated 21.11.2025 was submitted to the 2nd respondent, but no response has been received. 5, Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that appropriate orders may be passed in this Writ Petition by directing the respondents to consider the representations dated 07.01.2025 and 21.11.2025 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a reasonable period. Accordingly, prayed to allow the Writ Petition.

6. Learned Standing Counsel for TSHCL, appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the respondents would consider the representations of the petitioner dated 07.01.2025 and 21.11.2025 and pass a ppropriate orders

7. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner's l representations dated 07.O1.2025 and 21.11.2025 respectively and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight (B) weeks from the date oF receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. P. PONNA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR e SECTION OFFICER To,

2. 4 r,

7. PMK The Principal Secretary, Department Housing Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The Managing Director, Telangana State Housing Corporation, Urdu Galli, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad The Project Director (Housing), Telangana State Housing Corporation Ltd., Ranga Reddy, Telangana. One CC to SRI P. RAIVA SHARANA SHARMA, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI KIRAN REDDY MALLARAPU, SC FOR TSHCL [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOUSING, High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies b HIGH COURT DATED:3011212025 ) {rrE s I C,o 2 I JAll 2026 * , z. .c) * ORDER WP.No.40186 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 0 :\: \ ?s